A filter-independent model identification technique for turbulent combustion modeling

Combustion and Flame

Volumn 159, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1960-1970

  Biglari, Amir ^a   Sutherland, James C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Dimensionality reduction; Manifold; Principal Component Analysis (PCA); Turbulent combustion modeling

Indexed keywords

DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; LINEAR COMBINATIONS; MANIFOLD; MODEL IDENTIFICATION; MODELING APPROACH; NUMBER OF SPECIES; PARAMETERIZED; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS (PCA); PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; SOURCE TERMS; STATE VARIABLES; STATE-SPACE; TRANSPORT EQUATION; TURBULENT COMBUSTION;

BIODIVERSITY; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; DATA REDUCTION; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

COMBUSTION;

ARTICLE; COMBUSTION; FILTER; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION;

EID: 84857921231     PISSN: 00102180     EISSN: 15562921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.12.024     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Tennekes H., Lumley J.L. A First Course in Turbulence 1972, MIT Press.
2. Peters N. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1984, 10:319-339.
3. Peters N. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1986, 24:1231-1250.
4. Pitsch H., Peters N. Combust. Flame 1998, 114:26-40.
5. van Oijen J.A., de Goey L. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2000, 161:113-137.
6. J.A. van Oijen, Flamelet-Generated Manifolds: Development and Application to Premixed Flames, Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2002.
7. van Oijen J.A., de Goey L. Combust. Theory Modell. 2002, 6:463-478.
8. J.C. Sutherland, Evaluation Of Mixing And Reaction Models For Large-Eddy Simulation Of Nonpremixed Combustion Using Direct Numerical Simulation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah, 2004.
9. Bongers H., van Oijen J.A., Sommers L.M.T., Goey L.P.H.D. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2005, 177:2373-2393.
10. Sutherland J.C., Smith P.J., Chen J.H. Combust. Theory Modell. 2007, 11:287-303.
11. Gicquel N.D.O., Thévenin D. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2000, 28:1901-1908.
12. Fiorina B., Baron R., Gicquel O., Thevenin D., Carpentier S., Darabiha N. Combust. Theory Modell. 2003, 7:449-470.
13. Fiorina B., Gicquel O., Carpentier S., Darabiha N. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2004, 176:785-797.
14. E.R. Hawkes, R. Sankaran, J.C. Sutherland, J.H. Chen, in: Proc. Combust. Inst., volume 31, pp. 1633-1640.
15. Punati N., Sutherland J.C., Kerstein A.R., Hawkes E.R., Chen J.H. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33:1515-1522.
16. International Workshop on Measurement and Computation of Turbulent Nonpremixed Flames, 16?
17. Jolliffe I.T. Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics 2002, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
18. J. Shlens, A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis, Technical Report, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, 2009.
19. A. Parente, Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Advanced Systems for Hydrogen-based Fuel Combustion, Ph.D. Thesis, Università di Pisa, 2008.
20. Parente A., Sutherland J.C., Tognotti L., Smith P.J. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2009, 32:1579-1586.
21. Sutherland J.C., Parente A. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2009, 32:1563-1570.
22. Parente A., Sutherland J.C., Dally B.B., Tognotti L., Smith P.J. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33:3333-3341.
23. Keun H.C., Ebbels T.M.D., Antti H., Bollard M.E., Beckonert O., Holmes E., Lindon J.C., Nicholson J.K. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 490:265-276.
24. van den Berg R.A., Hoefsloot H.C., Westerhuis J.A., Smilde A.K., van der Werf M.J. BMC Genom. 2006, 7:142.
25. Noda I. J. Mol. Struct. 2008, 883-884:216-227.
26. Maas U., Pope S.B. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1992, 24:103-112.
27. Friedman J.H. Ann. Stat. 1991, 19:1-67.
28. J.H. Friedman, Fast MARS, Technical Report 110, Stanford University Department of Statistics, 1993.
29. Friedman J.H., Roosen C.B. Stat. Meth. Med. Res. 1995, 4:197-217.