A comparison of average daily risk range scores for young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring data

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 239-243

  Patton, Susana R ^a   Midyett, L Kurt ^a   Dolan, Lawrence M ^b   Powers, Scott W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AVERAGE DAILY RISK RANGE SCORE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; GOLD STANDARD; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INSULIN PUMP; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF MONITORING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84857817466     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: 15578593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2011.0169     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Silverstein J, Klingensmith G, Copeland K, Plotnick L, Kaufman F, Laffel L, Deeb L, Grey M, Anderson B, Holzmeister LA, Clark N: Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2005;28:186-212. (Pubitemid 40095803)
2. Kaufman FR, Austin J, Lloyd J, Halvorson M, Carpenter S, Pitukcheewanont P: Characteristics of glycemic control in young children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2002; 3:179-183. (Pubitemid 36024619)
3. Patton SR, Williams LB, Eder SJ, Crawford MJ, Dolan L, Powers SW: Use of continuous glucose monitoring in young children with type 1 diabetes: implications for behavioral research. Pediatr Diabetes 2011;12:18-24.
4. McDonnell CM, Donath SM, Vidmar SI, Werther GA, Cameron FJ: A novel approach to continuous glucose analysis utilizing glycemic variation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7: 253-263. (Pubitemid 40586369)
5. Kovatchev BP, Otto E, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick L, Clarke W: Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2433-2438. (Pubitemid 44912248)
6. Wadwa RP, Fiallo-Scharer R, Vanderwel B, Messer LH, Cobry E, Chase HP: Continuous glucose monitoring in youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11(Suppl 1): S-83-S-91.
7. Keenan DB, Cartaya R, Mastrototaro JJ: The pathway to the closed-loop artificial pancreas: research and commercial perspectives. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2010;7(Suppl 3):445-451.
8. Cameron F, Bequette BW, Wilson DM, Buckingham BA, Lee H, Niemeyer G: A closed-loop artificial pancreas based on risk management. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011;5:368-379.
9. Baghurst PA: Calculating the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion from continuous glucose monitoring data: an automated algorithm. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13:296-302.
10. Service FJ, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, Ackerman E, Gatewood LC, Taylor WF: Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes 1970;19: 644-655.