Could antispasmodic drug reduce pain during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) in infertile patients? A randomized double-blind clinical trial

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 260-265

  Moro, F ^a   Selvaggi, L ^a   Sagnella, F ^a   Morciano, A ^a   Martinez, D ^a   Gangale, M F ^a   Ciardulli, A ^a   Palla, C ^a   Uras, M L ^a   De Feo, E ^a   Boccia, S ^a,b   Tropea, A ^a   Lanzone, A ^c   Apa, R ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b IRCCS SAN RAFFAELE PISANA   (Italy)

^c OASI RESEARCH INSTITUTE IRCCS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Fallopian tube; hyoscine N butylbromide; infertility; pain; sonosalpingohysterography; SSHG; tubes

Indexed keywords

CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CONTRAST MEDIA; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FALLOPIAN TUBE PATENCY TESTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PARASYMPATHOLYTICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857808861     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.11089     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Hajishafiha M, Zobairi T, Zanjani VR, Ghasemi-Rad M, Yekta Z, Mladkova N,. Diagnostic value of sonohysterography in the determination of fallopian tube patency as an initial step of routine infertility assessment. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 1671-1677.
2. Ahinko-Hakamaa K, Huhtala H, Tinkanen H,. The validity of air and saline hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in tubal patency investigation before insemination treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132: 83-87. (Pubitemid 46635970)
3. Kupesic S, Plavsic BM,. 2D and 3D hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography in the assessment of uterine cavity and tubal patency. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 133: 64-69. (Pubitemid 46962880)
4. Brown SE, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, Toner JP, Gibbons W, Oehninger S,. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography, and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 1029-1034.
5. Lindheim SR, Adsuar N, Kushner DM, Pritts EA, Olive DL,. Sonohysterography: a valuable tool in evaluating the female pelvis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003; 58: 770-784. (Pubitemid 37352171)
6. Guney M, Oral B, Bayhan G, Mungan T,. Intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain relief during saline solution infusion sonohysterography: a randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 304-310. (Pubitemid 46660804)
7. Fleischer AC, Vasquez JM, Cullinan JA, Eisenberg E,. Sonohysterography combined with sonosalpingography: correlation with endoscopic findings in infertility patients. J Ultrasound Med 1997; 16: 381-384. (Pubitemid 27387991)
8. Heikkinen H, Tekay A, Volpi E, Martikainen H, Jouppila P,. Transvaginal salpingosonography for the assessment of tubal patency in infertile women: methodological and clinical experiences. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 293-298.
9. Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF,. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 406-411. (Pubitemid 30060380)
10. Rudigoz RC, Salle B, Piacenza JM, de Saint-Hilaire P, Gaucherand P,. Hysterosonographic study of the uterine cavity. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1995; 24: 697-704.
11. Killick SR,. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography as a screening test for tubal patency in infertile women. J R Soc Med 1999; 92: 628-631. (Pubitemid 30040086)
12. Helpman L, Wolman I,. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography for the evaluation of the tubal factor in infertility investigation: review of literature. Rev Gynaecol Perinatal Pract 2003; 3: 171-176. (Pubitemid 40418186)
13. Hamed HO, Shahin AY, Elsamman AM,. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 215-217.
14. Anserini P, Delfino F, Ferraiolo A, Remorgida V, Menoni S, De Caro G,. Strategies to minimize discomfort during diagnostic hysterosalpingography with disposable balloon catheters: a randomized placebo-controlled study with oral nonsteroidal premedication. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 844-848.
15. Owens OM, Schiff I, Kaul AF, Cramer DC, Burt RAP,. Reduction of pain following hysterosalpingogram by prior analgesic administration. Fertil Steril 1985; 43: 146-148. (Pubitemid 15198292)
16. Peters AAW, Witte EH, Damen ACH, Holm JP, Drogendijk AC, Velde EA, Trimbos JB,. Pain relief during and following outpatient curettage and hysterosalpingography. A double blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of tramadol versus naproxen. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996; 66: 51-56. (Pubitemid 26150044)
17. Elson EM, Ridley NTF,. Paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for hysterosalpingography: a double blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 675-678. (Pubitemid 32054602)
18. Costello MF, Horrowitz S, Steigrad S, Saif N, Bennett M, Ekangaki A,. Transcervical intrauterine topical local anesthetic at hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 1116-1122. (Pubitemid 35292518)
19. Kafali H, Cengiz M, Demir N,. Intrauterine lidocaine gel application for pain relief during and after hysterosalpingography. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2003; 83: 65-67. (Pubitemid 37162833)
20. Frishman GN, Spencer PK, Weitzen S, Plosker S, Shafi F,. The use of intrauterine lidocaine to minimize pain during hysterosalpingography; a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 1261-1266. (Pubitemid 40458959)
21. De Mello JF Sr, Abrao MS, Cerri GG, de Barros N,. Evaluation of pain in three hysterosalpingography techniques: metal cannula with and without paracervical blockage and balloon catheter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 86-89. (Pubitemid 46100150)
22. Tur-Kaspa I, Seidman DS, Soriano D, Greenberg I, Dor J, Bider D,. Hysterosalpingography with a balloon catheter versus a metal cannula: a prospective, randomized, blinded comparative study. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 75-77. (Pubitemid 28075276)
23. Costello MF, Steigrad S, Collet A,. A prospective, randomised, single blinded, controlled trial comparing two topical anaesthetic modalities for the application of a tenaculum to the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 781-785. (Pubitemid 43160971)
24. Rogerson L, Bates J, Weston M, Duffy S,. A comparison of outpatient hysteroscopy with saline infusion hysterosonography. BJOG 2002; 109: 800-804. (Pubitemid 37329256)
25. Socolov D, Boian I, Boiculese L, Tamba B, Anghelache-Lupascu I, Socolov R,. Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 111: 256-259.
26. Stacey C, Bown C, Manhire A, Rose D,. HyCoSy-as good as claimed? Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 133-136.
27. Saunders RD, Shwayder JM, Nakajima ST,. Current methods of tubal patency assessment. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 2171-2179.
28. Tur-Kaspa I, Gal M, Hartman M, Hartman J, Hartman A,. A prospective evaluation of uterine abnormalities by saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) in 1009 women with infertility or abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 1731-1735.
29. Elsayes KM, Pandya A, Platt JF, Bude RO,. Technique and diagnostic utility of saline infusion sonohysterography. [Review] Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 5-9.
30. Goodman MP,. Rapid Lidocaine Infusion Sonohysterography and Biopsy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996; 3 (Suppl): S16.
31. Dijkman AB, Mol BW, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Hogerzeil HV,. Can hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility? Eur J Radiol 2000; 35: 44-8. (Pubitemid 30621421)
32. Ayida G, Kennedy S, Barlow D, Chamberlain P,. A comparison of patient tolerance of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with Echovist-200 and X-ray hysterosalpingography for outpatient investigation of infertile women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 201-204. (Pubitemid 126720362)
33. Costello MF, Horrowitz S, Steigrad S, Saif N, Bennett M, Ekangaki A,. Transcervical intrauterine topical local anesthetic at hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 1116-1122. (Pubitemid 35292518)
34. Lau WC, Tam WH, Lo WK, Yuen PM,. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of transcervical intrauterine local anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy. BJOG 2000; 107: 610-613. (Pubitemid 30242853)
35. Spieldoch RL, Winter TC, Schouweiler C, Ansay S, Evans MD, Lindheim Sr,. Optimal catheter placement during sonohysterography: a randomized controlled trial comparing cervical to uterine placement. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 15-21.
36. Widrich T, Bradley LD, Mitchinson AR, Collins RL,. Comparison of saline infusion sonography with office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of the endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1327-1334. (Pubitemid 26131156)
37. Aggarwal P, Zutshi V, Batra S,. Role of hyoscine N-butyl bromide (HBB, buscopan) as labor analgesic. Indian J Med Sci 2008; 62: 179-184. (Pubitemid 351821548)
38. Jareethum R, Suksompong S, Petyim S, Prechapanich J, Laokirkkiat P, Choavaratana R,. Efficacy of mefenamic acid and hyoscine for pain relief during saline infusion sonohysterography in infertile women: a double blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 155: 193-198.
39. Gomaa N, Uhlig A, Schusser GF,. Effect of Buscopan compositum on the motility of the duodenum, cecum and left ventral colon in healthy conscious horses. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2011; 124: 168-174.
40. Tytgat GN,. Hyoscine butylbromideâ€"a review on its parenteral use in acute abdominal spasm and as an aid in abdominal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24: 3159-3173.
41. Korell M, Seehaus D, Strowitzki T, Hepp H,. Radiologic versus ultrasound Fallopian tube imaging. Painfulness of the examination and diagnostic reliability of hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingo-contrast- ultrasonography with echovist 200. Ultraschall Med 1997; 18: 3-7.
42. Holz K, Becker R, Schürmann R,. Ultrasound in the investigation of tubal patency. A meta-analysis of three comparative studies of Echovist-200 including 1007 women. Zentralbl Gynakol 1997; 119: 366-373. (Pubitemid 27359886)
43. Benditt DG, Ferguson DW, Grubb BP, Kapoor WN, Kugler J, Lerman BB, Maloney JD, Raviele A, Ross B, Sutton R, Wolk MJ, Wood DL,. Tilt table testing for assessing syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 263-275. (Pubitemid 26266650)
44. Chen-Scarabelli C, Scarabelli TM,. Neurocardiogenic syncope. BMJ 2004; 329: 336-341. (Pubitemid 39062306)