Are safety investigations pro-active?

Safety Science

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1422-1430

  Stoop, John ^a,b   Dekker, Sidney ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Accident investigation; Human factor; Methodology; Safety management system

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION; DIAGNOSTIC POTENTIAL; LEARNING POTENTIAL; LOW PROBABILITY; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC SAFETY; SAFETY ASSESSMENTS; SAFETY INVESTIGATION; SAFETY ISSUES; SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; SCIENTIFIC THEORIES;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ACCIDENTS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; COPING BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DISASTER PLANNING; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RESPONSIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SAFETY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS; TRUST;

EID: 84857801485     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ale, B., 2003. Ons overkomt dat niet. Inaugural lecture Delft University of Technology, 17 September 2003.
2. Allsop, R., 2005. Co-referring the 7th ETSC annual lecture. In: Europe and its road safety vision-how far to zero? The 7th European Transport Safety lecture. Prof. Claes Tingvall with comments of Prof Richard Allsop and Klaus Machata, Brussels.
3. Baron, E., 2007. Cognitive or behavioral Approach? April-June 2007, ISASI Forum, pp. 5-9.
4. Benner L. Rating accident models and investigation methodologies. Journal of safety research 1985, 16:105-126.
5. Benner, L., 1996. Accident Investigations: A Case for New Perceptions and Methodologies. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, USA. The Investigation Process Research Resource Site.
6. Benner, L., 2009. Five Accident perceptions: their implications for accident investigators. Journal of System Safety, September-October 2009, pp. 17-23.
7. Benner, L., Rimson, I.J., 2009. Sifting lessons from the ashes: avoiding lost learning opportunities. In: 40th Annual Seminar " Accident prevention beyond Investigations''. International Society of Air Safety Investigators.
8. Braut, A., Nja, O., 2010. Learning from accidents (incidents) - theoretical perspectives on investigation reports as educational tools. In: Guedes Soares, Matorell, (Eds.), Reliability, Risk and safety: Theory and Applications Bris, Taylor and Francis Group, London.
9. De Bruijn, H., 2007. Een gemakkelijke waarheid. Waarom we niet leren van onderzoekcommissies. NSOB, 2007.
10. Dekker S. Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. Journal of Safety Research 2002, 33:371-385.
11. Dekker S. The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error 2006, Ashgate Publishing.
12. Edwards, E., 1972. Man and Machine: Systems for Safety. Loughborough: University of Technology, United Kingdom.
13. ERTMS, 2007. Een onafhankelijk onderzoek naar nut en noodzaak van de aanpassing van het HSL-beveiligingssysteem ERTMS. In: Stoop, J.A., Baggen, J.H., Vleugel, J.M., de Kroes en, J.L., Vrancken, J.L.M. (Eds.), Opdracht van het Onderzoeks - En Verificatiebureau van de Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal Technische Universiteit Delft.
14. ETSC, 2001. Transport Accident and Incident Investigations in the European Union. European Transport Safety Council. Brussels.
15. ETSC, 2005. Europe and its road safety vision-how far to zero? In: The 7th European Transport Safety lecture. Prof. Claes Tingvall with Comments of Prof Richard Allsop and Klaus Machata. Brussels.
16. Freer, R., 1986. The Roots of Internationalism. 1783-1903. ICAO Bulletin 41 (3).
17. Freer R. ICAO at 50 years: riding the flywheel of technology. ICAO Journal 1994, 49(7):19-32.
18. Hale, A., 2006. Method in Your Madness: System in Your Safety. Valedictory Lecture, 15th September 2006, Delft University of Technology.
19. Hendrickx, L., 1991. How Versus How Often. The Role of Scenario Information and Frequency Information in Risk Judgement and Risky Decision Making. Doctoral Thesis. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
20. Hollnagel, E., Nemeth, C., Dekker, S., 2008. Remaining Sensitive to the Possibility of Failure. Resilience Engineering Perspectives, vol. 1. Ashgate Studies in Resilience Engineering, Ashgate.
21. Hollnagel, E., Pieri, F., Rigaud, E., 2008. In: Proceedings of the Third Resilience Engineering Symposium. October 28-30, 2008 Antibes - Juan-les-Pins, France. Mines Paristech. Collection Sciences économiques.
22. Johnson, K., 2007. Key Note Address to ITSA Meeting 16th May, 2007.
23. Kahan, J., 1998. Safety Board Methodology. In: Hengst, Smit, Stoop 1998, Second World Congress on Safety of Transportation. 18-20 February 1998, Delft University Press, Delft University of Technology.
24. Katsakiori, P., Sakellaropoulos, G., Manatakis, E., 2008. Towards an Evaluation of Accident Investigation Methods in terms of their Alignment with Accident Causation Models. Paper accepted for Safety Science, November 2008.
25. Kletz, T., (1991) An engineer's view of human error. Second Edition. Institution of Chemical Engineers. Warwickshire, UK.
26. Lees F. Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 1960, vol. 1. Oxford Butterworth Heinemann.
27. Mertens, F., 2006. Toezicht in een Polycentrische Samenleving. Inaugurele rede Technische Universiteit Delft, 26 April 2006.
28. Michon, J., 1971. Psychonomie Onderweg. Inaugural lexture at the University of Groningen, November 2nd 1971, Groningen, Wolters-Noordhoff.
29. Moray, J., 2007. The human factor of complex systems: a personal view. In: Dick de Waard, Bob Hockey, (Eds.), Human Factors Issues in Complex System Performance, Peter Nickel and karel Brookhuis. Snaker Publishing.
30. Rasmussen J. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modeling problem. Safety Science 1997, 27(2/3):183-213.
31. Rasmussen, J., Svedung, I., 2000. Proactive Risk Management in a Dynamic Society. Karlstad, Sweden, Swedish Rescue Services Agency.
32. RIVM, 2003. Coping Rationally with Risks. Rijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. RIVM Rapport 251701047. Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
33. Roed-Larsen, S., Stoop, J., Funnemark, E., 2005. Shaping Public Safety Investigations of Accidents in Europe. An ESReDA Working Group Report. Det Norske Veritas.
34. Roelen A., Lin P., Hale R. Accident modeling and organizational factors in air transport: The need for real models. Safety Science 2011, 49(1):1-106.
35. Rosenthal, U., 1999. Challenges of crisis management in Europe. In: International Conference on the Future of European Crisis management. The Hague, November 7-9th, 1999.
36. Steenhuisen, R., Van Eeten, M., 2008. Invisible trade-offs of public values: inside Dutch railways. Public Money &Management, 147-152.
37. Sklet S. Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2004, 111:29-37.
38. Slovic P., et al. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. Risk Analysis 2004, 24(2).
39. Stoop, J., 2004. Independent accident investigation: a modern safety tool. Special Issue of the Journal of Hazardous Materials. Papers from the JRC/ESReDA Seminar on Safety Investigation of Accidents, Petten, The Netherlands, 12-13 May, 2003. vol. 111, 2004, pp. 39-45.
40. Stoop, J., Dekker, S., 2008. In: Proceedings of the Third Resilience Engineering Symposium. October 28-30, 2008 Antibes - Juan-les-Pins, France.Mines Paristech. Collection Sciences économiques.
41. Stoop, J. 2009. History of ITSA. <>. http://www.itsasafety.org/images/uploads/HistoryofITSA.pdf.
42. Strauch, B., 2002. Investigating Human Error: Incidents, Accidents, and Complex Systems. Ashgate.
43. Swuste P. You will only see it, if you understand it or occupational risk prevention from a management perspective. Human factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 2009, 18(4):438-4523.
44. TCI, 2004. Tijdelijke Commissie voor de Infrastructuur. Onderzoek naar infrastructuurprojecten. Reconstructie HSL-Zuid: de besluitvorming uitvergroot. Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 2004-2005, 29283, nr. 8, SDU, Den Haag.
45. Ten Hove, C., 2005. The Crisis After the Disaster. Aircrash Aftermath: A True Story. Aircrash of the Martinair DC-10 at Faro, Portugal. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
46. Van Ravenzwaaij, A., 1994. Risico-informatie in het veiligheidsbeleid. Een analyse van de bruikbaarheid van kwantitatieve risico-informatie in het Nederlandse externe veiligheidsbeleid. Doctoral thesis, University of Utrecht, 1994.
47. Van Vollenhoven, P., 2006. RisicoVol/High Risk. Intreerede/Inaugural Lecture, Universiteit Twente 28 April 2006.
48. Vaughan D. The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology 1999, 25:271-305.
49. WRR, 2008. Onzekere veiligheid. Verantwoordelijkheden rond fysieke veiligheid. Uncertain safety, responsibilities about physical safety. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid. Amsterdam University Press (in Dutch).
50. Young, C., Braithwaite, G., Shorrock, P., Faulkner, E., 2005. The (R)Evolution of human factors in transport safety investigation. ISASI Forum. July-September 2005.