The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland

Land Use Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 887-898

  Halleux, Jean Marie ^a   Marcinczak, Szymon ^b   van der Krabben, Erwin ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LODZ   (Poland)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive efficiency; Belgium; Compact city; Land use planning; Poland; Residential sprawl; The Netherlands; Urban containment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; PLANNING PRACTICE; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

BELGIUM; NETHERLANDS; POLAND;

EID: 84857798053     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Adams D., Tiesdell S. Planners as market actors: rethinking state-market relations in land and property. Planning Theory & Practice 2010, 11(2):187-207.
2. Adams D., Watkins C. Greenfields, Brownfields and Housing Developments 2002, Blackwell Science, Real Estate Issues, Oxford.
3. Adams D., De Sousa C., Tiesdell S. Brownfield development: a comparison of North American and British approaches. Urban Studies 2010, 47(1):75-104.
4. Albrechts L. Changing aspects of Belgian public planning. Perspectives on Planning and Urban Development in Belgium. 1992, 27-42. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London. A. Dutt, F. Costa (Eds.).
5. Albrechts L. Planners as catalysts and initiators of change. The new structure plan for flanders. European Planning Studies 1999, 7(5):587-603.
6. Alexander E.R. The Netherlands' unique planning system: a visitor's comparisons. Rooilijn 1988, 21(5):145-150.
7. Arvanitidis P.A. Property market purpose efficiency: an exploratory analysis from an institutional economics perspective. Discussion paper series 12(7). 46th Congress of the European Regional Science Association 2006.
8. Ball M. Markets and Institutions in Real Estate and Construction 2006, Blackwell Science, Real Estate Issues, Oxford.
9. Bakker Schut F. De regeling der bebouwing buiten de kernen 1944, VNG/NIVS, The Hague.
10. Urban-rural relations in Europe. ESPON 1. 1. 2. Final Report 2006, ESPON, Luxembourg. C. Bengs, K. Schmidt-Thomé (Eds.).
11. Bertaud A., Renaud B. Socialist Cities without Land Markets. Journal of Urban Economics 1997, 41(1):137-151.
12. Boelens L., Ovink H., Pálsdottir H.L., Wierenga E. Compact City Extended Outline for future policy, research, and design 2011, Uitgeverij 010, Rotterdam.
13. Boelhouwer P.J. The incomplete privatization of the Dutch housing market: exploding house prices versus falling house-building output. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2005, 20(4):363-378.
14. Bontje M. A " planners's paradise" lost? Past, present and future of Dutch national urbanization policy. European Urban and Regional Studies 2003, 10(2):135-151.
15. Breheny M. Centrists, Decentrists and Compromisers. Views on the future of urban forms. The Compact City: a Sustainable Urban Form? 1996, 13-35. E & FH Spon, London. M. Jenks, F. Burton, K. Williams (Eds.).
16. Brueckner J.K. Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. International Journal Science Review 2000, 23(2):160-171.
17. Buitelaar E. Neither market nor government. Comparing the performance of user rights regimes. Town Planning Review 2003, 74(3):315-330.
18. Buitelaar E. Cracks in the myth: challenges to land policy in the Netherlands. TESG 2010, 101(3):349-356.
19. Buitelaar E., Lagendijk A., Jacobs W. A theory of institutional change: illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39:891-908.
20. Buitelaar E., Segeren A., Kronberger A. Stedelijke transformatie en grondeigendom 2008, NAI Uitgevers/PBL, The Hague.
21. Coase R.H. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 1960, 3:1-44.
22. Commission of the European Communities European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU 1999, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
23. Couch C., Karecha J. Controlling urban sprawl: Some experiences from Liverpool. Cities 2006, 23(5):353-363.
24. De Decker P. Facets of housing and housing policies in Belgium. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2008, 23(3):155-171.
25. De Decker P., Kesteloot C., De Maesschalck F., Vranken J. Revitilizing the city in an anti-urban context: extreme right and the rise of urban policies in Flanders, Belgium. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2005, 1(29):152-171.
26. De Vries J., Van den Broeck J. Benelux: a microcosm of planning cultures. Built Environment 1997, 23(1):58-68.
27. Dieleman F.M., Dijst M., Spit T. Planning the compact city: The Randstad Holland experience. European Planning Studies 1999, 7(5):605-621.
28. Dieleman F.M., Wegener M. Compact city and urban sprawl. Built Environment 2004, 30(4):308-323.
29. Dolowitz D.P., Medearis D. Considerations of the obstacles and opportunities to formamizing cross-national policy transfer to the United Stats: a case study of the transfer of urban environmental and planning policies from Germany. Environment and Planning C: Governement and Policy 2009, 27:684-697.
30. Doucet P. La politique foncière, une nécessité oubliée?. Les Cahiers de l'Urbanisme 1985, 6:65-78.
31. Dubois O., Gabriel I., Halleux J.-M., Michel Q. Révision des plans de secteur et mécanismes fonciers en Wallonie: objectifs politiques outils juridiques et mise en œuvre. Etudes et Documents - CPDT 2, DGATLP 2002, Ministère de la Région wallonne, Namur.
32. Dubois-Taine G. Cost action C10 synthesis: outskirts of European cities - understand better, govern better. European Cities - Insight on Outskirts: Eleven Case Studies & Synthesis. COST Action C10 2004, 7-55. European Science Foundation, Brussels. G. Dubois-Taine (Ed.).
33. EEA, (European Environment Agency), 2006. Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge. Report no. 10/2006, Copenhagen.
34. Faludi A. The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research 2000, 15(4):299-318.
35. Faludi A., Van der Valk A. Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century 1994, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
36. Fouchier V. Les densités urbaines et le développement durable. Le cas de l'Ile-de-France et des villes nouvelles 1997, Editions du SGVN, Paris.
37. Gentile M., Sjöberg ö. Soviet housing: who built and when? The case of Daugavpils, Latvia. Journal of Historical Geography 2010, 36(4):453-465.
38. Geurs K.T., van Wee B. Ex-post evaluation of thirty years of compact urban development in the Netherlands. Urban Studies 2006, 43(1):139-160.
39. Golubchikov O. Urban planning in Russia: towards the market. European Planning Studies 2004, 12:229-247.
40. Urban Sprawl. Warsaw Agglomeration Case Study 2002, Wydawnictwo UW, Warszawa. M. Gutry-Korycka (Ed.).
41. Groetelaers D.A. Instrumentarium Locatieontwikkeling. Sturingsmogelijkheden voor gemeenten in een veranderde marktsituatie 2004, DUP Science, Delft.
42. Groetelaers D.A. Building land and the urban land development process: characteristics, rights and market. Conference paper TS 75 Issues Arising in Land and Property Development, Shaping the Change XXIII FIG Congress 2006.
43. Hajer M., Zonneveld W. Spatial planning in the network society - rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies 2000, 8(3):337-355.
44. Halleux J.-M. Outskirts dynamics and new residential developments in Belgium: a comparative analysis with the Swiss and Danish contexts. European Cities - Insight on Outskirts: Dynamics. COST Action C10 2004, 51-72. European Science Foundation, Brussels. M. Franzén, J.-M. Halleux (Eds.).
45. Halleux J.-M. Urban sprawl, urban containment and land management, A reflection on the concept of urban supply. Urban future: Challenges and opportunities for city and region developments. 2008, 259-268. University of Maribor Press. M. Sitar (Ed.).
46. Halleux J.-M. The spatial structuring of interurban housing markets: application to building sites prepared for self-provided housing. Environment and Planning A 2009, 41:2143-2161.
47. Halleux J.-M, Lambotte J.-M. Friches d'habitat et désurbanisation en Wallonie. Géocarrefour 2004, 79(2):153-161.
48. Halleux J.-M., Lambotte J.-M. Reconstruire la ville sur la ville. Le recyclage et le renouvellement des espaces dégradés. Territoire(s) wallon(s) 2008, 2:7-22.
49. Haumont F. Les instruments juridiques de la politique foncière 1990, Story-Scientia, Brussels.
50. Hofstede G. Cultures Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values 1980, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi.
51. Jakóbczyk-Gryszkiewicz J. Model of development of suburban zones - the example of major Polish agglomerations. European Spatial Research and Policy 2002, 9(1):41-52.
52. Jakóbczyk-Gryszkiewicz J., Marcinczak S., Siejkowska A. Dynamika i skutki procesów urbanizacji w regionach miejskich po 1990 roku na przykładzie regionu miejskiego Łodzi 2010, Wydawnictwo UŁ, Łódź.
53. Kasanko M., Barredo J.I., Lavalle C., McCormick N., Demicheli L., Sagris V., Brezger A. Are European cities becoming dispersed? a comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 77(1-2):111-130.
54. Keogh G., D'Arcy E. Property market efficiency: an institutional economics perspective. Urban Studies 1999, 36(13):2401-2414.
55. Kolpron Grondbezit en grondverwerving VINEX uitleglocaties 1997, Kolpron, Rotterdam.
56. Korthals Altes W.K., Groetelaers D.A. De ontwikkeling van uitbreidingslocaties: context en praktijk. Achtergrondinformatie mededelingenblad van de Vereniging van Grondbedrijven 2000, 18(1):33-45.
57. Korthals Altes W.K. Stagnation in housing production, another success in the Dutch " Planner's Paradise" ?. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2006, 33:97-114.
58. Korthals Altes W.K, Tambach M. Municipal strategies for introducing housing on industrial estates as part of compact-city policies in the Netherlands. Cities 2008, 25(4):218-229.
59. Krueckeberg D.A. The difficult character of property. To whom do things belong?. Journal of the American Planning Association 1995, 61(3):301-309.
60. Lefcoe G. When governments become land developers: notes on the public-sector experience in the Netherlands and California. California Law Review 1977, 51:165-263.
61. Levaĉić R. Markets and government: an overview. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life. 1991, 35-47. Sage Publications, London. G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levaĉić, J. Mitchell (Eds.).
62. Louw E., van der Krabben E., Priemus N. Spatial development policy: changing roles for local and regional authorithies in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy 2003, 20(4):357-366.
63. Maier K. Czech planning in transition: assets and deficiencies. International Planning Studies 1998, 3(3):351-365.
64. Mastop H. The performance principle in strategic spatial planning. The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning 2000, 143-155. KNAW, Amsterdam. W. Salet, A. Faludi (Eds.).
65. Mastop H., Faludi A. Evaluation of strategic plans: the performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1997, 24:815-832.
66. Mougenot C. Promoting the single-family house in Belgium: the social construction of model housing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1988, 12(4):531-549.
67. Needham B. Strategic Planning and the shape of the Netherlands through foreign eyes: but do appearances deceives?. Built Environment 1989, 15(1):11-16.
68. Needham B. Land policy in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische and Sociale Geografie 1997, 88(3):291-296.
69. Needham B. Dutch Land Use Planning: Planning and Managing Land Use in the Netherlands, The Principles and The Practice 2007, Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague.
70. Needham B., de Kam G. Understanding how land is exchanged: co-ordination mechanisms and transaction costs. Urban Studies 2004, 41(10):2061-2076.
71. Needham B., Louw E. Institutional economics and policies for changing land markets: the case of industrial estates in the Netherlands. Journal of Property Research 2006, 23(1):75-90.
72. Newman P.W.G., Kenworthy J.R. The land use - transport connexion. Land Use Policy 1996, 13(1):1-22.
73. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and the Economic Performance 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
74. Nussl H., Rink D. The production of urban sprawl in Eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post-socialist transformation. Cities 2005, 22:123-134.
75. Overbeek T. Wonen boven Wikems: subsidiegerichte of bedrijfsmatige aanpak 2007, Masterthesis Managment, Economics & Law, University of Twente.
76. Pennington M. Free market environmentalism and the limits of land use planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 1999, 1(1):43-59.
77. Pirenne H. Histoire de Belgique 1975, vol. IV. La renaissance du Livre, Brussels.
78. Priemus H. Market-oriented housing policy: a contradiction in terms. Recent Dutch experience. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1997, 21:133-142.
79. Priemus H., Louw E. Changes in the Dutch land policy: from monopoly towards competition on the building market. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2003, 30:369-378.
80. Robert-Müller A., Robert J. L'évolution de la planification locale aux Pays-Bas. Politiques urbaines comparées. 1983, 95-130. Editions à l'enseigne de l'Arbre Verdoyant, Paris. A. Heymann-Doat (Ed.).
81. Ruopilla S. Establishing a market-oriented urban planning system after state socialism: the case of Tallinn. European Planning Studies 2007, 15:405-427.
82. Schoonbrodt R. Plans de secteur - aménagement du territoire - urbanisme 1975, Fondation Travail-Université, Brussels. 3rd ed.
83. Sellers G. Urbanization and the social origins of national policies towards sprawl. Urban sprawl in Western Europe and the United States 2004, 195-275. Ashgate, Aldershot. H.W. Richardson, C.-H.C. Bae (Eds.).
84. Szelényi I. Urban Inequalities Under State Socialism 1983, Oxford University Press, New York.
85. Tasan-Kok T., Zaleczna M. Partnerstwo publiczno-prywatne w rozwoju przestrzeni miejskiej: polska praktyka na tle regulacji unijnych 2010, Ernst & Young, Warsaw.
86. Taskforce Woningbouwproductie, 2002. Achterblijvende woningbouwproductie; problematiek en maatregelen. Den Haag.
87. THB, 2008. Kansen voor Kwaliteit, een ontwikkelingstrategie voor bedrijventerreinen. Advies van de Taskforce (her)ontwikkeling bedrijventerreinen aan Minister van VROM en Minister van EZ. Den Haag.
88. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life 1991, Sage Publications, London. G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levaĉić, J. Mitchell (Eds.).
89. Tsenkova S. Reinventing strategic planning in post-socialist cities: experiences from Sofia. European Planning Studies 2007, 15(3):295-317.
90. van der Krabben E., Buitelaar E. Industrial land and property markets: market processes, market institutions and market outcomes: the Dutch Case. European Planning Studies 2011, 19(12):2127-2146.
91. van der Krabben E., Halleux J.-M. Choosing the right land management strategy: innovations in land management tools. Land Managment for Urban Dynamics. Innovative methods and practices in a changing Europe. COST Action TU0602 2011, 47-56. Maggioli, Milano. M. Tira, E. van der Krabben, B. Zanon (Eds.).
92. Verhage R. Induced cooperation in housing developments. comparing housing schemes in four European countries. European Planning Studies 2002, 10(3):305-320.
93. VROM, 1988. Vierde nota over de ruimtelijke ordening. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening and Milieubeheer, Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag.
94. VROM, 2004. Nota Ruimte: Ruimte voor ontwikkeling. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening and Milieubeheer, Sdu Uitgevers, Den Haag.
95. Webster C.J. Public choice, Pigouvian and Coasian planning theory. Urban Studies 1998, 35(1):53-75.
96. Zborowski, A., 2005. Przemiany struktury społeczno-przestrzennej regionu miejskiego w okresie realnego socjalizmu i transformacji ustrojowej (na przykładzie Krakowa), Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej UJ, Kraków.
97. Zonneveld W. A sea of houses: preserving open space in an urbanized country. Journal of Environmental Planning and Managment 2007, 20(5):657-675.