Comparison of outflow boundary conditions for subsonic aeroacoustic simulations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 68, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1207-1233

  Fosso P , A ^a   Deniau, H ^a   Lamarque, N ^a   Poinsot, T ^a  

^a CERFACS   (France)

Author keywords

Characteristic boundary conditions; Outflow conditions; Radiation boundary conditions

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC PROPAGATION; AERO-ACOUSTIC SIMULATION; BUFFER ZONES; CHARACTERISTIC METHOD; LINEARIZED EULER EQUATION; NAVIER STOKES; NON REFLECTING BOUNDARY CONDITION; OUTFLOW CONDITION; RADIATION BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; UNIFORM FLOW; VORTEX CONVECTION;

AEROACOUSTICS; EULER EQUATIONS; SHEAR FLOW; VORTEX FLOW;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

EID: 84857785968     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2597     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Thompson KW. Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems. Journal of Computational Physics 1987; 68:1-24.
2. Giles MK. Non-reflecting boundary conditions for Euler equations calculations. AIAA Journal 1990; 28:2050-2058.
3. Poinsot TJ, Lele SK. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 101:104-129.
4. Prosser R. Improved boundary conditions for the direct numerical simulation of turbulent subsonic flows. I: inviscid flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 207:736-768.
5. Yoo CS, Im HG. Characteristic boundary conditions for simulations of compressible reacting flows with multi-dimensional, viscous and reaction effects. Combustion Theory and Modelling 2007; 11(2):259-286.
6. Tam CKW, Dong Z. Radiation and outflow boundary conditions for direct computation of acoustic and flow disturbances in a nonuniform mean flow. Journal of Computational Acoustics 1996; 4(2):175-201.
7. Lele SK. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 103:16-42.
8. Freund JB. Noise sources in a low-Reynolds-number turbulent jet at Mach 0.9. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2001; 438:277-305.
9. Lodato G, Domingo P, Vervisch L. Three-dimensional boundary conditions for direct and large-eddy simulation of compressible viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227:5105-5143.
10. Guézennec N, Poinsot T. Acoustically nonreflecting and reflecting boundary conditions for vorticity injection in compressible solvers. AIAA Journal 2009; 47:1709-1722.
11. Liu Q, Vasilyev OV. Nonreflecting boundary conditions based on nonlinear multidimensional characteristics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2010; 62(1):24-55.
12. Berenger JP. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 114:185-200.
13. Tam CKW, Auriault L, Cambuli F. Perfectly matched layer as an absorbing boundary condition for the linearized Euler equations in open and ducted domains. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 144:213-234.
14. Hu FQ. A perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition for linearized Euler equations with a non-uniform mean flow. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 208(2):469-492.
15. Tam CKW, Webb JC. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 107(2):262-281.
16. Hardin JC, Ristorcelli JR, Tam CKW (eds). ICASE/LaRC Workshop on Benchmark Problems in Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA), NASA and ICASE: Hampton, VA, 1994.
17. Tam CKW, Hardin JC (eds). Second Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) Workshop on Benchmark Problems, NASA and the Florida State University: Tallahassee, FL, 1996.
18. Hixon R, Shih SH, Mankbadi RR. Evaluation of boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics. AIAA Journal 1995; 33:2006-2012.
19. Fosso Pouangue A, Deniau H, Sicot F, Sagaut P. Curvilinear finite-volume schemes using high-order compact interpolation. Journal of Computational Physics 2010; 229(13):5090-5122.
20. Cambier L, Veuillot J. Status of the elsa software for flow simulation and multi-disciplinary applications. 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2008-0664, Reno, NV, 2008.
21. Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV. On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 181(1):155-185.
22. Berland J, Bogey C, Bailly C. Low-dissipation and lowfld2597-dispersion fourth-order Runge-Kutta algorithm. Computers & Fluids 200635:1459-1463.
23. Rudy D, Strikwerda J. A nonreflecting outflow boundary condition for subsonic Navier-Stokes calculations. Journal of Computational Physics 1980; 36:55-70.
24. Granet V, Vermorel O, Leonard T, Gicquel L, Poinsot T. Comparison of non-reflecting boundary conditions for compressible solvers at subsonic outlets in complex geometries. AIAA Journal 2010; 48:2348-2364.
25. Selle L, Nicoud F, Poinsot T. The actual impedance of non-reflecting boundary conditions: implications for the computation of resonators. AIAA Journal 2004; 42(5):958-964.
26. Bogey C, Bailly C. Three-dimensional non-reflective boundary conditions for acoustic simulations: far field formulation and validation test cases. Acta Acoustica 2002; 88:463-471.
27. Moureau V, Lartigue G, Sommerer Y, Angelberger C, Colin O, Poinsot T. Numerical methods for unsteady compressible multi-component reacting flows on fixed and moving grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 202(2):710-736.