Curvilinear finite-volume schemes using high-order compact interpolation

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 229, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 5090-5122

  Fosso P , Arnaud ^a   Deniau, Hugues ^a   Sicot, Frédéric ^a   Sagaut, Pierre ^b  

^a CERFACS   (France)

^b INSTITUT JEAN LE ROND D ALEMBERT   (France)

Author keywords

Aeroacoustics; Compact interpolation; Finite volume; High order scheme; Multiblock computations; Stability analysis

Indexed keywords

DISPERSION (WAVES); FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; TAYLOR SERIES;

COMPACT INTERPOLATION; COMPLEX GEOMETRIES; FINITE VOLUME SCHEMES; FINITE-VOLUME; HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATIONS; HIGH-ORDER SCHEME; HIGHER ORDER COMPACTS; MULTIBLOCK COMPUTATION; STABILITY ANALYZE; TEST CASE;

INTERPOLATION;

EID: 77952420973     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.03.027     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ashcroft G., Zhang X. Optimized prefactored compact schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 2003, 190(2):459-477.
2. L. Cambier, M. Gazaix, elsA: an efficient object-oriented solution to CFD complexity, in: 40th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, AIAA 2002-0108, January 2002, pp. 14-17.
3. Gaitonde D.V., Shang J.S. Optimized compact-difference-based finite-volume schemes for linear wave phenomena. Journal of Computational Physics 1997, 138(2):617-643.
4. D.V. Gaitonde, M.R. Visbal, Further development of a Navier-Stokes solution procedure based on higher-order formulas, in: 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, No. AIAA-1999-557, January 11-14 1999.
5. Gamet L., Ducros F., Nicoud F., Poinsot T. Compact finite difference schemes on non-uniform meshes. application to direct numerical simulations of compressible flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1999, 29:159-191.
6. X. Gloerfelt, Bruit Rayonné par un Écoulement Affleurant une Cavité: Simulation Aéroacoustique Directe et Application de Méthodes Intégrales. Ph.D. thesis, Laboratoire de Mécanique de Fluides et d'Acoustique, UMR CNRS 5509, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, Novembre 2001.
7. S. Gottlieb, W. Chi-Shu, Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes, Tech. Rep., Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering (ICASE), 1996.
8. Gustafsson B. The convergence rate for difference approximations to mixed initial boundary value problems. Mathematics of Computations 1975, 29(130):396-406.
9. J.C. Hardin, J.R. Ristorcelli, C.K.W. Tam (Eds.), October 24-26 1994, ICASE/LaRC Workshop on Benchmark Problems in Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA), NASA and ICASE, Hampton, Virginia.
10. Hixon R. Prefactored small-stencil compact schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 2000, 165(2):522-541.
11. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, E. Turkel, Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes, in: AIAA 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamic Conference, No. AIAA Paper 81-1259, Palo Alto, 1981.
12. Kobayashi M.H. On a class of padé finite volume methods. Journal of Computational Physics 1999, 156(1):137-180.
13. Lacor C., Smirnov S., Baelmans M. A finite volume formulation of compact schemes on arbitrary structured grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2004, 198:535-566.
14. Lele S.K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. Journal of Computational Physics 1992, 103:16-42.
15. Mattiussi C. An analysis of finite volume, finite element, and finite difference methods using some concepts of algebraic topology. Journal of Computational Physics 1997, 133(2):289-309.
16. Nance D.V., Viswanathan K., Sankar L.N. Low-dispersion finite volume scheme for aeroacoustic applications. AIAA Journal 1997, 35(2):255-262.
17. Pereira J.M.C., Kobayashi M.H., Pereira J.C.F. A fourth-order-accurate finite volumenext term compact method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes solutions. Journal of Computational Physics 2001, 167(1):217-243.
18. Piller M., Stalio E. Finite-volume compact schemes on staggered grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2004, 197(1):299-340.
19. Piller M., Stalio E. Compact finite volume schemes on boundary-fitted grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2008, 227(9):4736-4762.
20. Poinsot T.J., Lele S.K. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics 1992, 101:104-129.
21. Popescu M., Shyy W., Garbey M. Finite volume treatment of dispersion-relation-preserving and optimized prefactored compact schemes for wave propagation. Journal of Computational Physics 2005, 210(2):705-729.
22. Sengupta T.K., Ganeriwal G., De S. Analysis of central and upwind compact schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 2003, 192:677-694.
23. Tam C.K.W. Computational aeroacoustics: issues and methods. AIAA Journal 1995, 33(10):1788-1796.
24. Tam C.K.W., Dong Z. Radiation and outflow boundary conditions for direct computation of acoustic and flow disturbances in a nonuniform mean flow. Journal of Computational Acoustics 1996, 4(2):175-201.
25. Tam C.K.W., Webb J.C. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics 1993, 107(2):262-281.
26. Visbal M.R., Gaitonde D.V. On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes. Journal of Computational Physics 2002, 181(1):155-185.