Wheat leaf bidirectional reflectance measurements: Description and quantification of the volume, specular and hot-spot scattering features

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 121, Issue , 2012, Pages 26-35

  Comar, A ^a,c   Baret, F ^a   Vienot F ^b   Yan, L ^a   de Solan, B ^a,c  

^a UAPV   (France)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^c ARVALIS   (France)

Author keywords

BRDF; BRF; Conoscope; Fourier optics; Hotspot; Specular; Volume scattering; Wheat

Indexed keywords

BRDF; BRF; CONOSCOPE; HOT SPOT; SPECULAR; VOLUME SCATTERING; WHEAT;

FOURIER OPTICS; REFLECTION; REMOTE SENSING; SURFACE SCATTERING;

SCATTERING;

ANISOTROPY; BIDIRECTIONAL REFLECTANCE; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; MEASUREMENT METHOD; REMOTE SENSING; RESOLUTION; SCATTERING; VOLUME; WAVELENGTH; WHEAT; ZENITH ANGLE;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84857752726     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.01.028     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bass M. The Optical Society of America: Handbook of Optics. Chapter 17: Microscope: Orthoscopic vs. Conoscopic Imaging 1995, Vol 2. McGraw-Hill, New York. 2nd ed.
2. Bousquet L., Lacherade S., Jacquemoud S., Moya I. Leaf BRDF measurements and model for specular and diffuse components differentiation. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 98:201.
3. Brakke T.W., Smith J.A., Harnden J.M. Bidirectional scattering of light from tree leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment 1989, 29:175-183.
4. Breece H.T., Holmes R.A. Bidirectional scattering characteristics of healthy green soybeans and corn leaves in vivo. Applied Optics 1971, 10:119-127.
5. Bruegge C., Chrien N., Haner D. A spectralon BRF data base for MISR calibration applications. Remote Sensing of Environment 2001, 76:354-366.
6. Chelle M. Could plant leaves be treated as Lambertian surfaces in dense crop canopies to estimate light absorption?. Ecological Modelling 2006, 198:219-228.
7. Combes D., Bousquet L., Jacquemoud S., Sinoquet H., Varlet-Grancher C., Moya I. A new spectrogoniophotometer to measure leaf spectral and directional optical properties. Remote Sensing of Enviroment 2007, 109:107-117.
8. Fourty T., Baret F. Vegetation water and dry matter contents estimated from top of the atmosphere reflectance data: a simulation study. Remote Sensing of Environment 1997, 61:34-45.
9. Fourty T., Baret F., Jacquemoud S., Schmuck G., Verdebout J. Leaf optical properties with explicit description of its biochemical composition: direct and inverse problems. Remote Sensing of Environment 1996, 56:104-117.
10. Ged G., Obein G., Silvestri Z., Le Rohellec J., Viénot F. Recognizing real materials from their glossy appearance. Journal of Vision 2010, 10.
11. Gitelson A.A., Gritz Y., Merzlyak M.N. Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology 2003, 160:271-282.
12. Grant L., Daughtry C.S.T., Vanderbilt V.C. Variations in the polarized leaf reflectance of sorghum bicolor. Remote Sensing of Environment 1987, 21:333-339.
13. Greinier M.A., Duncan B.D., Dierking M.P. Bidirectional scattering distribution functions of maple and cottonwood leaves. Applied Optics 2007, 46:6485-6494.
14. Holmes M.G., Keiller D.R. Effects of pubescence and waxes on the reflectance of leaves in the ultraviolet and photosynthetic wavebands: a comparison of a range of species. Plant, Cell & Environment 2002, 25:85-93.
15. Howard J.A. Increased luminance in the direction of reflex reflection - a recently observed natural phenomenon. Nature 1969, 224:1102-1103.
16. 4 reference panels. Remote Sensing of Environment 1992, 40:231-239.
17. Jacquemoud S., Verhoef W., Baret F., Bacour C., Zarco-Tejada P.J., Asner G.P., et al. PROSPECT + SAIL models: a review of use for vegetation characterization. Remote Sensing of Environment 2009, 113:S56-S66.
18. Levizou E., Drilias P., Psaras G.K., Manetas Y. Nondestructive assessment of leaf chemistry and physiology through spectral reflectance measurements may be misleading when changes in trichome density co-occur. New Phytologist 2004, 165:463-472.
19. Lewis P. 3D canopy modelling as a tool in remote-sensing research 2007, Springer, Dordrecht.
20. Li X., Strahler A.H. Geometric-Optical Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1985, GE-23:705-9279.
21. Markwell J., Osterman J.C., Mitchell J.C. Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynthesis Research 1995, 46:467-472.
22. McClendon J.H., Fukshansky L. On the interpretation of absorption spectra of leaves-1. Introduction and the correction of leaf spectra for surface reflection. Photochemistry and Photobiology 1990, 51:203-210.
23. Mistele B., Schmidhalter U. Estimating the nitrogen nutrition index using spectral canopy reflectance measurements. European Journal of Agronomy 2008, 29:184.
24. Moreau O., Curt J.N., Leroux T. Contrast and colorimetry measurements versus viewing angle for microdisplays. Proceedings of SPIE 2000, 4207:20-30.
25. Nelder J.A., Mead R.A. A simplex method for function optimization. The Computer Journal 1965, 7:308-313.
26. Obein G., Knoblauch K., Viénot F. Difference scaling of gloss: Nonlinearity, binocularity, and constancy. Journal of Vision 2004, 4.
27. Obein G., Leroux T., Vienot F. Bi-directional reflectance distribution factor and gloss scales. Human Vision and Electronic Imaging Vi 2001, 279-290. B.E.P.T.N. Rogowitz (Ed.).
28. Rondeaux G., Vanderbilt V.C. Specularly modified vegetation indices to estimate photosynthetic activity. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1993, 14:1815-1823.
29. Roujean J.L., Leroy M., Deschamps P.Y. A bidirectional reflectance model of the Earth's surface for the correction of remote sensing data. Journal of Geophysical Research 1992, 97:20455-20468.
30. Rykowski R.a.L., J. Novel Technology for view angle performance measurement 2008, 41-42. IMID/IDMC.
31. Saleh B.E.A., Teich M.C. Fundamentals of Photonics 1991.
32. Sanz C., Espana M., Baret F., Weiss M., Vaillant L., Hanocq J.F., et al. Bi-directional characteristics of leaf reflectance and transmittance: measurement and influence on canopy bi-directional reflectance. 7th International Symposium on physical measurements and signatures in remote sensing 1997, 583-590. Balkema, Courchevel (France). G. Guyot, T. Phulpin (Eds.).
33. Sarto A.W., Woldemar C.M., Vanderbilt V.C. POlarized Light Angle instrument I polarized incidence (POLAR:I) 1989, 220-221. SPIE, San Diego, California, (USA. SPIE (Ed.).
34. Saunderson J.L. Calculation of the color of pigmented plastics. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1942, 32:727-729.
35. Slaton M.R., Hunt E.R.J., Smith W.K. Estimating near-infrared leaf reflectance from leaf structural characteristics. American Journal of Botany 2001, 88:278-284.
36. Stuckens J., Somers B., Delalieux S., Verstraeten W.W., Coppin P. The impact of common assumptions on canopy radiative transfer simulations: a case study in Citrus orchards. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 2009, 110:1-21.
37. Terashima I., Saeki T. Light environment within a leaf I. Optical properties of paradermal sections of Camellia leaves with special reference to differences in the optical properties of palissade and spongy tissues. Plant & Cell Physiology 1983, 24:1493-1501.
38. Torrance K.E., Sparrow E.M. Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1967, 57:1105-1112.
39. Walter-Shea E.A., Norman J.M., Blad B.L. Leaf bidirectional reflectance and transmittance in corn and soybean. Remote Sensing of Environment 1989, 29:161-174.