Spatial divergence in living standards during an economic growth phase in the periphery: A case study of North Karelia

Fennia

Volumn 189, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 47-62

  Lehtonen, Olli ^a   Tykkyläinen, Markku ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Core periphery; Living standards; Spread effects

Indexed keywords

COMMUTING; CORE-PERIPHERY RELATIONS; ECONOMIC GROWTH; LIVING STANDARD; NEIGHBORHOOD; PERIPHERAL REGION; RURAL AREA; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH;

FINLAND; POHJOIS-KARJALA;

EID: 84857724701     PISSN: 00150010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. rd ERSA Congress, Jyväskylä August 27-30.
2. Bell M, Blake M, Boyle P, Duke-Williams O, Rees P, Stillwell J & Hugo G 2002. Cross-national comparison of internal migration: issues and measures. Journal of Royal Statistical Society 165:3, 435-464.
3. Berube A, Singer A, Wilson J & Frey W 2006. Finding exurbia: America's fast-growing communities at the metropolitan fringe. Living Cities Census Series October 2006, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
4. Black D & Henderson V 1999. A Theory of urban growth. Journal of Political Economy 107:2, 252-284. (Pubitemid 29326436)
5. Bowman A & Azzalini A 1997. Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: the Kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Coccia M 2008. Spatial mobility of knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity: analysis and measurement of the impact within the geoeconomic space. Journal of Technology Transfer 22, 105-122.
7. Combes P-P, Thierry M & Thisse J-F 2008. Economic geography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
8. Cooke P & Leydesdorff L 2006. Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: the construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer 3:5-15. (Pubitemid 43019064)
9. Dillon W & Goldstein M 1984. Multivariate analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. Faraway J 2006. Extending the linear model with R. Generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York.
11. Fujita M & Krugman P 2004. The new economic geography: Past, present and future. Papers of Regional Science 83:1, 139-164.
12. Garretsen H & Martin R 2010. Rethinking (new) economic geography models: Taking geography and history more seriously. Spatial Economic Analysis 5:2, 127-160.
13. Glaeser E 2000. The new economics of urban and regional growth. In Gordon C, Meric G & Feldman M (ed). The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, 83-98. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Gløersen E 2009. Strong, specific and promising. Towards a vision for the northern sparsely populated area in 2020. Nordregio Working Paper 2009:4. Nordregio, Stockholm.
15. Gløersen E, Dubois A, Copus A & Schürmann C 2005. Northern peripheral, sparsely populated regions in the European North. Nordregio Report 2005:4. Nordregio, Stockholm.
16. Kainulainen S, Rintala T & Heikkilä M 2001. Hyvinvoinnin alueellinen erilaistuminen 1990-luvun Suo messa. Tutkimuksia 114. STAKES, Helsinki.
17. Karvonen S & Rintala T 2005. Suomi pirstaleina? Hyvinvoinnin alueelliset erot 2000-luvulla. Maaseudun Uusi Aika 13:2, 4-20.
18. Karvonen S & Rintala T 2007. Maakuntien sisäiset hyvinvointierot. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 72:4, 410-416.
19. KOTA Online 2010. Database. Ministry of Education, Helsinki.
20. Krugman P 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. The Journal of Political Economy 99:3, 473-499.
21. Krugman P 1993. Geography and trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Krugman P 1998. What's new about the new economic geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14:2, 7-17. (Pubitemid 28437421)
23. Lehtonen O & Tykkyläinen M 2009. Muuttoliikkeen alueelliset muodostumat ja pulssi Suomessa 1980-2006. Terra 121:2, 119-137.
24. Lever W 2001. Correlating the knowledge-base of cities with economic growth. Urban Studies 39:5-6, 859-870.
25. Lundholm E 2007. New motives for migration? On interregional mobility in the Nordic countries. GERUM 2007:2.
26. Martinez-Zarzoso I 2003. Gravity model: An application to trade between regional blocs. Atlantic Economic Journal 31:2, 174-187. (Pubitemid 36878247)
27. OECD 2006. The new rural paradigm. OECD, Paris.
28. Paasi A & Vartiainen P 1981. Keskuksen ja ympäristön välinen muuttoliike: tapaustutkimus Joensuusta. Terra 83:2, 57-72. (Pubitemid 12270802)
29. Pacione M 2005. Urban geography, a global perspective. Routledge, New York.
30. Partridge M, Bollman R, Olfert M & Alesia A 2007. Riding the wave of urban growth in the countryside: spread, backwash, or stagnation? Land Economics 83:2, 128-152. (Pubitemid 47008278)
31. Partridge M & Rickman D 2008. Distance from urban agglomeration economies and rural poverty. Journal of Regional Science 48:2, 285-310. (Pubitemid 351593978)
32. Partridge M, Rickman D, Ali K & Olfert M 2008. Lost in space: population growth in the American hinterlands and small cities. Journal of Economic Geography 8:6, 727-757.
33. Polèse M & Shearmur R 2004. Is distance really dead? Comparing industrial location patterns over time in Canada. International Regional Science Review 27:4, 431-457. (Pubitemid 39320321)
34. Raspe O & Van Oort F 2006. The knowledge economy and urban economic growth. European Planning Studies 14:9, 1209-1234. (Pubitemid 44614837)
35. Rosenthal S & Strange W 2001. The determinants of agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics 50:2, 191-229. (Pubitemid 33082737)
36. Rouvinen P & Ylä-Anttila P 2003. Case study: Little Finland's transformation to a wireless giant. In Dutta S, Lanvin B & Paua F (ed). The Global Information Technology Report 2003-2004, 87-107. Oxford University Press, New York.
37. Schmitt B & Henry M 2000. Size and growth of urban centers in French labor market areas: consequences for rural population and employment. Regional Science and Urban Economics 30:1, 1-21. (Pubitemid 30087312)
38. Siirilä S, Hautamäki L, Kuitunen J & Keski-Petäjä T 1990. Regional well-being variations in Finland. Fennia 168:2, 179-200.
39. Statistics Finland 1996. Suomi CD. Statistics Finland, Helsinki.
40. Statistics Finland 2006. Suomi CD. Statistics Finland. Helsinki.
41. Statistics Finland 2010a. Regional Account, Database. Statistics Finland, Helsinki.
42. Statistics Finland 2010b. Research and Development, Database. Statistics Finland, Helsinki.
43. Suorsa K 2007. Regionality, innovation policy and peripheral regions in Finland, Sweden and Norway. Fennia 185:1, 15-29. (Pubitemid 351192647)
44. Tervo H 2009. Centres and peripheries in Finland: granger causality tests using panel data. Spatial Economic Analysis 4:4, 377-390.
45. Tykkyläinen M 1988. Periphery syndrome - a reinterpretation of regional development theory in a resource periphery. Fennia 166:2, 295-411. (Pubitemid 19291647)
46. Vaattovaara M 1998. Pääkaupunkiseudun sosiaalinen erilaistuminen: ympäristö ja alueellisuus. City of Helsinki Urban Facts Research Series 1998:7.
47. Van Oort F, Oud J & Raspe O 2009. The urban knowledge economy and employment growth: a spatial structural equation modeling approach. Annals of Regional Science 43:4, 857-877.
48. Vartiainen P 1998. Suomalaisen aluepolitiikan kehitysvaiheita. Aluekehitysosaston julkaisuja 6/1998. Sisäasiainministeriö, Helsinki.
49. Vartiainen P & Viiri A 2002. Universities and their local partners. Industry and Higher Education 16:2, 83-89.
50. Voith R 1998. Do suburbs need cities? Journal of Regional Science 38:3, 445-464. (Pubitemid 28486187)
51. Vyas S & Kumaranayke L 2006. Constructing socioeconomic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning 21:6, 459-468. (Pubitemid 44627319)
52. Westin H 1999. An interaction-cots perspective on networks and territory. Annals of Regional Science 22:1, 93-121.