Dialogue act modeling in a complex task-oriented domain

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2010 Conference: 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group onDiscourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 297-305

  Boyer, Kristy Elizabeth ^a   Ha, Eun Young ^a   Phillips, Robert ^b   Wallis, Michael D ^b   Vouk, Mladen A ^a   Lester, James C ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

^b APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING EXERCISE; DATA-DRIVEN; DIALOGUE MANAGEMENT; DIALOGUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; EVENT STREAMS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFIERS; COMPLEX TASK; DATA DRIVEN; DIALOG ACTS; DIALOGUE ACT MODELLING; ORIENTED DOMAINS; TASK-ORIENTED; VECTOR-BASED REPRESENTATIONS;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

MANAGEMENT; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD;

EID: 84857722506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Allen, J., Ferguson, G., & Stent, A. (2001). An architecture for more realistic conversational systems. Proceedings of the IUI, 1-8. (Pubitemid 32470935)
2. Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2008). Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4), 555-596.
3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bangalore, S., Di Fabbrizio, G., & Stent, A. (2008). Learning the structure of task-driven human-human dialogs. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 16(7), 1249-1259.
5. Berger, A. L., Pietra, V. J. D., & Pietra, S. A. D. (1996). A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Comp. Ling., 22(1), 71.
6. Boyer, K. E., Phillips, R., Ha, E. Y., Wallis, M. D., Vouk, M. A., & Lester, J. C. (2009). Modeling dialogue structure with adjacency pair analysis and hidden markov models. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, Short Papers, 49-52.
7. Boyer, K. E., Phillips, R., Ha, E. Y., Wallis, M. D., Vouk, M. A., & Lester, J. C. (2010). Leveraging hidden dialogue state to select tutorial moves. Proceedings of the 5th NAACL HLT Workshop on Innovative use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Los Angeles, California.
8. Chotimongkol, A. (2008). Learning the structure of task-oriented conversations from the corpus of indomain dialogs. (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation). Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science.
9. Core, M., & Allen, J. (1997). Coding dialogs with the DAMSL annotation scheme. AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, 28-35.
10. De Marneffe, M. C., MacCartney, B., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. Proceedings of LREC, Genoa, Italy.
11. Forbes-Riley, K., & Litman, D. (2009). Adapting to student uncertainty improves tutoring dialogues. Proceedings of AIED, 33-40.
12. Frampton, M., & Lemon, O. (2009). Recent research advances in reinforcement learning in spoken dialogue systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 24(4), 375-408.
13. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. (2009). The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations, 11(1)
14. Hardy, H., Biermann, A., Inouye, R. B., McKenzie, A., Strzalkowski, T., Ursu, C., Webb, N., & Wu, M. (2006). The Amitiés system: Data-driven techniques for automated dialogue. Speech Comm., 48(3-4), 354-373. (Pubitemid 43207406)
15. Litman, D., & Forbes-Riley, K. (2006). Correlations between dialogue acts and learning in spoken tutoring dialogues. Natural Language Engineering, 12(2), 161-176. (Pubitemid 43786490)
16. Loper, E., & Bird, S. (2004). NLTK: The natural language toolkit. Proceedings of the ACL Demonstration Session, Barcelona, Spain. 214-217.
17. Porter, M. F. (1980). An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3), 130-137.
18. Purver, M., Kording, K. P., Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2006). Unsupervised topic modelling for multi-party spoken discourse. Proceedings of the ACL, Sydney, Australia., 44(1) 17.
19. Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257-286.
20. Sridhar, V. K. R., Bangalore, S., & Narayanan, S. (2009). Combining lexical, syntactic and prosodic cues for improved online dialog act tagging. Computer Speech & Language, 23(4), 407-422.
21. Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., Taylor, P., Martin, R., Van Ess-Dykema, C., & Meteer, M. (2000). Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Comp. Ling., 26(3), 339-373.
22. Wright Hastie, H., Poesio, M., & Isard, S. (2002). Automatically predicting dialogue structure using prosodic features. Speech Communication, 36(1-2), 63-79. (Pubitemid 33034219)
23. Young, S., Gasic, M., Keizer, S., Mairesse, F., Schatzmann, J., Thomson, B., & Yu, K. (2009). The hidden information state model: A practical framework for POMDP-based spoken dialogue management. Computer Speech and Language, 24(2), 150-174.