Technological innovations in tissue removal during rhinologic surgery

American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 65-69

  Sindwani, Raj ^a   Manz, Ryan ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EAR NOSE THROAT SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC DRILL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MICRODEBRIDER; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; REVIEW; RHINOLOGIC SURGERY; SAFETY; SOFT TISSUE; SOFT TISSUE REMOVAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; ULTRASONIC ASPIRATOR;

CATHETER ABLATION; DEBRIDEMENT; ENDOSCOPY; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; NASAL CAVITY; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; ULTRASONIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84857702238     PISSN: 19458924     EISSN: 19458932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3722     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Stankiewicz JA. Complications of microdebriders in endoscopic nasal and sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 10:26-28, 2002. (Pubitemid 34131198)
2. Setliff RC. The hummer: A remedy for apprehension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 29:95-104, 1996.
3. Goode RL. Powered microdebrider for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114:676-677, 1996. (Pubitemid 26114273)
4. Parsons DS. Rhinologic uses of powered instrumentation in children beyond sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 29:105-114, 1996. (Pubitemid 26041114)
5. Bruggers S, and Sindwani R. Innovations in microdebrider technology and design. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:781-787, 2008.
6. Zweig JL, Schaitkin BM, and Fan CY. Histopathology of tissue samples removed using microdebrider technique: Implications for endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 14:27-32, 2000.
7. Joniau S, Wong J, Rjapaksa S, et al. Long term comparison between submucosal cauterization and powered reduction of inferior turbinates. Laryngoscope 116:1612-1616, 2006. (Pubitemid 44368081)
8. Boone JL, Feldt BA, McMains KC, and Weitzel EK. Improved function of prototype 4.3mm Medtronic Quadcut microdebrider blade over standard 4.0mm Medtronic Tricut microdebrider blade. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 1:198-200, 2011.
9. Sauer M. Comparing the microdebrider and standard instruments in endoscopic sinus surgery: A double-blind randomized study. Br J ENT 3:1-7, 2007. (Pubitemid 47522898)
10. Kumar N, and Sindwani R. Bipolar microdebrider reduces intraoperative blood loss and operative time during nasal polyp surgery. Laryngoscope 119(Supp 1):S143, 2009.
11. Bhatti MT, Giannoni CM, Raynor E, et al. Ocular motility complications after endoscopic sinus surgery with powered cutting instruments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:501-509, 2001. (Pubitemid 33662696)
12. Berenholz L, Kessler A, Sarfaty S, et al. Subarachnoid hemorrhage: A complication of endoscopic sinus surgery using powered instrumentation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:665-667, 1999. (Pubitemid 29519947)
13. Zinder DJ. Common myths about electrosurgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:450-455, 2000.
14. Swibel Rosenthal LH, Benninger MS, Stone CH, et al. Wound healing in the rabbit paranasal sinuses after Coblation: Evaluation for use in endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:360-363, 2009.
15. Swibel-Rosenthal LH, Benninger MS, Stone CH, et al. Wound healing in the paranasal sinuses after Coblation, Part II: Evaluation for endoscopic sinus surgery using a sheep model. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24:464-466, 2010.
16. Back LJ, Hytonen ML, Malmberg HO, et al. Submucosal bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation of inferior turbinates: A long-term follow-up with subjective and objective assessment. Laryngoscope 112:1806-1812, 2002.
17. Eloy JA, Walker TJ, Casiano RR, et al. Effect of Coblation polypectomy on estimated blood loss in endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:535-539, 2009.
18. Smith N, Riley K, and Woodworth B. Endoscopic coblator assisted management of encephaloceles. Laryngoscope 120:2535-2539, 2010.
19. Antisdel JL, Kadze MS, and Sindwani R. Application of ultrasonic aspirator to endo-scopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:586-588, 2008.
20. Anderson P, and Sindwani R. Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 119:1828-1833, 2009.
21. Bruggers S, and Sindwani R. Evolving trends in powered endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:789-798, 2009.
22. Greywoode JD, Van Abel K, and Pribitkin EA. Ultrasonic bone aspirator turbinoplasty: A novel approach for management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Laryngoscope 120s:239, 2010.
23. Pagella F, Giourgos G, Matti E, et al. Removal of a fronto-ethmoidal osteoma using the Sonopet Omni bone curette: First impressions. Laryngoscope 118:307-309, 2008. (Pubitemid 351640207)