|
Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-7
|
Comparing the microdebrider and standard instruments in endoscopic sinus surgery: A double-blind randomised study
|
Author keywords
Endoscopic sinus surgery; Instrument; Microdebrider; Outcome; Powered
|
Indexed keywords
ADHESION;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CHRONIC SINUSITIS;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NOSE POLYP;
NOSE SURGERY;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
SCORING SYSTEM;
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADOLESCENT;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
DEBRIDEMENT;
ENDOSCOPY;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
FOLLOW UP;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MAXILLA SINUSITIS;
MICROSURGERY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NOSE OBSTRUCTION;
PARANASAL SINUSITIS;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SINUSITIS;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
DEBRIDEMENT;
ENDOSCOPY;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
ETHMOID SINUSITIS;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MAXILLARY SINUSITIS;
MICROSURGERY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NASAL OBSTRUCTION;
NASAL POLYPS;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
SINUSITIS;
|
EID: 34347218618
PISSN: 1781782X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (25)
|
References (12)
|