The reasoned action model: Directions for future research

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 640, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 58-80

  Jaccard, James ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

idiographic models; multioption models; reasoned action theory; split second models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857675767     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716211426097     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ajzen Icek,Fishbein Martin.The prediction of behavioral intentions in a choice situation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1969;5:400-416.
2. Anderson NormanFoundations of information integration theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1981:.
3. Bettman James R.,Johnson Eric J.,Payne John W. 1995. A perspective on using computers to monitor information acquisition. In Advances in consumer research, vol. 22, eds. Frank Kardes and Mit Sujan, 49-51. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
4. Curtis Brenda.Understanding tailored Internet smoking cessation messages: A reasoned action approach.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2012;:.
5. Davidson Andrew,Morrison Dianne.Predicting contraceptive behavior from attitudes: A comparison of within-versus across-subjects procedures for predicting behavior from attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;45:97-109.
6. Desarbo William S.,Jedidi Kamal,Sinha Indrajit.Customer value analysis in a heterogeneous market.Strategic Management Journal. 2001;22:845-57.
7. Duchowski Andrew T.Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. Berlin: Springer; 2007:.
8. Einhorn Hillel,Hogarth Robin.Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice.Annual Review of Psychology. 1981;32:53-88.
9. Fishbein Martin 1967. A behavioral theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. In Readings in attitude theory and measurement, ed. Martin Fishbein, 389-400. New York, NY: Wiley.
10. Fishbein Martin,Ajzen IcekBelief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975:.
11. Fishbein Martin,Ajzen IcekPredicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2010:.
12. Green Paul E.,Srinivasan V. Seenu.Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice.Journal of Marketing. 1990;54:3-19.
13. Gross James The handbook of emotion regulation. New York, NY: Guilford; 2007:.
14. Jaccard James.Attitudes and behavior: Implications of attitudes towards behavioral alternatives.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1981;17:286-307.
15. Jaccard James,Becker Michael.Attitudes and behavior: An information integration perspective.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1985;21:440-65.
16. Jaccard James,Brinberg David,Ackerman Lee.Assessing attribute importance: A comparison of six methods.Journal of Consumer Research. 1986;12:463-68.
17. Jaccard James,Dittus Patricia,Dodge Tonya,Poynton TimFactors influencing belief salience and stability: The impact of information characteristics, situational variables, and individual difference variables. Albany, NY: Center for Applied Psychological Research, State University of New York at Albany; 1999:.
18. Jaccard James,King George W.A probabilistic model of the relationship between beliefs and behavioral intentions.Human Communications Research. 1977;3:332-42.
19. Jaccard James,Knox Richard,Brinberg David.Prediction of behavior from beliefs: An extension and test of a subjective probability model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979;37:1239-48.
20. Jaccard James,Sheng Diana.A comparison of six methods for assessing the importance of perceived consequences in behavioral decisions: Applications from attitude research.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1984;20:1-28.
21. Jacoby Jacob.Perspectives on a consumer information processing research program.Communications Research. 1975;2:203-15.
22. Kaplan David.Finite mixture dynamic regression modeling of panel data with implications for response analysis.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2005;30:169-87.
23. Kaplan Kalman J.,Fishbein Martin.The source of beliefs, their saliency, and prediction of attitude.Journal of Social Psychology. 1969;78:63-74.
24. Langbein Laura,Lichtman AllanEcological inference. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1978:.
25. Lee Keith,Pesaran Hesem,Pierse Robert.Testing for aggregation bias in linear models.The Economic Journal. 1990;100:137-50.
26. Moore David S.,McCabe George P. Introduction to the practice of statistics. 1998. Introduction to the practice of statistics, 3rd ed.New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.New York, NY: W. H. Freeman; 1998:.
27. MorrellChristopher. 1999. Simpson's paradox: An example from a longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Statistics Education7 (3). Available from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/jse_archive.htm.
28. Muthén Bengt,Shedden Kerby.Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm.Biometrics. 1999;55:463-69.
29. Muthén Linda,Muthén BengtMplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen; 2006:.
30. Noar Seth M.Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.Psychological Bulletin. 2007;133:673-93.
31. Orme BryanGetting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison, WI: Research Publishers; 2005:.
32. Payne John W.,Braunstein Michael,Carroll John S.Exploring pre-decisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1978;22:17-44.
33. Peterson Cameron,Beach Lee R.Man as an intuitive statistician.Psychological Bulletin. 1967;68:29-46.
34. Richetin Juliete,Conner Mark,Perugini Marco.Not doing is not the opposite of doing: Implications for attitudinal models of behavioral prediction.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2011;37:40-54.
35. Schmitt Neal.Comparison of subjective and objective weighting strategies in changing task situations.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1978;21:171-88.
36. Slovic Paul,Fischhoff Baruch,Lichtenstein Sarah.Behavioral decision theory.Annual Review of Psychology. 1977;28:1-39.
37. Smith Craig A.,Kirby Leslie 2000. Consequences require antecedents: Toward a process model of emotion elicitation. In Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition, ed. Joseph P. Forgas, 83-106. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38. Szalay Lorand B.,Deese JamesSubjective meaning and culture: An assessment through word associations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1978:.
39. Tversky Amos,Kahneman Daniel.Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology. 1973;5:207-32.
40. Van Horn Lee M.,Jaki Thomas,Masyn Katherine,Ramey Sharon.Assessing differential effects: Applying regression mixture models to identify variations in the influence of family resources on academic achievement.Developmental Psychology. 2009;45:1298-1313.
41. Vermunt Jeroen K.,Van Dijk Liesbet.A nonparametric random-coefficients approach: The latent class regression model.Multilevel Modeling Newsletter. 2001;13:6-13.
42. Wedel Michael,DeSarbo Wayne S. 1994. A review of recent developments in latent class regression models. In Advanced methods of marketing research, ed. Richard P. Bagozzi, 352-88. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
43. Westbrooke Ian.Simpson's paradox: An example in a New Zealand survey of jury composition.Chance. 1998;11:40-42.
44. Wilson Tracey,Jaccard James,Endias Robert,Minkoff Howard.HIV antibody testing: Beliefs affecting the consistency between women's behavioral intentions and behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1996;19:1734-48.
45. Wyer Robert S.Cognitive organization and change: An information processing approach. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum; 1974:.
46. Zhu Hong-Tu,Zhang Heping.Hypothesis testing in mixture regression models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B. 2004;66:3-16.