Use of fraction flow reserve to predict changes over time in management of superficial femoral artery

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 71-77

  Lotfi, A S ^a   Sivalingam, S K ^a   Giugliano, G R ^a   Ashraf, J ^a   Visintainer, P ^a  

^a BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

AGED; ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERIPHERAL CIRCULATION; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESTENOSIS; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY STENOSIS;

ADENOSINE; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANKLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; MALE; MASSACHUSETTS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84857650081     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00691.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Langer RD, et al,. The epidemiology of peripheral arterial disease: Importance of identifying the population at risk. Vasc Med 1997; 2: 221-226. (Pubitemid 27468155)
2. Fowkes FG, Housley E, Cawood EH, et al,. Edinburgh Artery Study: Prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the general population. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20: 384-392.
3. Kannel WB, McGee DL,. Update on some epidemiologic features of intermittent claudication: The Framingham Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985; 33: 13-18. (Pubitemid 15153432)
4. Isner JM, Kaufman J, Rosenfield K, et al,. Combined physiologic and anatomic assessment of percutaneous revascularization using a Doppler guidewire and ultrasound catheter. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 70D-86D. (Pubitemid 23149642)
5. Mewissen MW,. Primary nitinol stenting for femoropopliteal disease. J Endovasc Ther 2009; 16: II63-II81.
6. Rocha-Singh KJ, Jaff MR, Crabtree TR, et al,. Performance goals and endpoint assessments for clinical trials of femoropopliteal bare nitinol stents in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 910-919. (Pubitemid 46867500)
7. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Akasaka T, et al,. Coronary pressure and FFR predict long-term outcome after PTCA. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2001; 4: 67-76. (Pubitemid 33150876)
8. Pijls NH, Klauss V, Siebert U, et al,. Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow-up: A multicenter registry. Circulation 2002; 105: 2950-2954. (Pubitemid 34693825)
9. Kapoor N, Fahsah I, Karim R, et al,. Physiological assessment of renal artery stenosis: Comparisons of resting with hyperemic renal pressure measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76: 726-732.
10. Leesar MA, Varma J, Shapira A, et al,. Prediction of hypertension improvement after stenting of renal artery stenosis: Comparative accuracy of translesional pressure gradients, intravascular ultrasound, and angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 2363-2371.
11. Leng GC, Fowkes FG,. The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire: An improved version of the WHO/Rose Questionnaire for use in epidemiological surveys. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 1101-1109.
12. Tabrizchi R, Bedi S,. Pharmacology of adenosine receptors in the vasculature. Pharmacol Ther 2001; 91: 133-147. (Pubitemid 33139798)
13. Schindler CW, Karcz-Kubicha M, Thorndike EB, et al,. Role of central and peripheral adenosine receptors in the cardiovascular responses to intraperitoneal injections of adenosine A1 and A2A subtype receptor agonists. Br J Pharmacol 2005; 144: 642-650. (Pubitemid 40445612)
14. Koelemay MJ, den Hartog D, Prins MH, et al,. Diagnosis of arterial disease of the lower extremities with duplex ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 404-409. (Pubitemid 26083184)
15. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, et al,. Peripheral arterial disease: Comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 2005; 235: 699-708. (Pubitemid 40571116)
16. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P, et al,. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation 2007; 115: 2745-2749. (Pubitemid 46842791)
17. Pijls NHJ, Bruyne Bd,. Coronary Pressure, 2nd ed. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
18. Ellis SG, Holmes DR,. Strategic Approaches in Coronary Intervention, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
19. Bech GJ, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, et al,. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty. Circulation 1999; 99: 883-888. (Pubitemid 29094301)
20. Klauss V, Erdin P, Rieber J, et al,. Fractional flow reserve for the prediction of cardiac events after coronary stent implantation: Results of a multivariate analysis. Heart 2005; 91: 203-206. (Pubitemid 40164028)
21. Cutlip DE, Chauhan MS, Baim DS, et al,. Clinical restenosis after coronary stenting: Perspectives from multicenter clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 2082-2089. (Pubitemid 36005891)
22. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS,. Coronary in-stent restenosis-predictors, treatment and prevention. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1739-1749.
23. Kiernan TJ, Kiernan GD, Yan BD,. Coronary artery restenosis: A paradigm of current treatment approaches. Minerva Cardioangiol 2009; 57: 77-94.
24. Singh M, Gersh BJ, McClelland RL, et al,. Clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the Prevention of Restenosis With Tranilast and Its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial. Circulation 2004; 109: 2727-2731. (Pubitemid 38737919)
25. Capek P, McLean GK, Berkowitz HD,. Femoropopliteal angioplasty. Factors influencing long-term success. Circulation 1991; 83: I70-I80.
26. Mwipatayi BP, Hockings A, Hofmann M, et al,. Balloon angioplasty compared with stenting for treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease: A meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 461-469. (Pubitemid 351172652)
27. Twine CP, Coulston J, Shandall A, McLain AD,. Angioplasty versus stenting for superficial femoral artery lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009: CD006767.
28. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al,. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501. (Pubitemid 24256752)
29. Selvin S., Statistical Analysis of Epidemiologic Data, 3rd ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.