Diagnostic discography: What is the clinical utility?

Current Pain and Headache Reports

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 26-34

  Provenzano, David A ^a  

^a Ohio Valley General Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Discogenic back pain; Discogram; Discography; Low back pain; Pain management; Pressure controlled discography; Provocation discography

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BUPIVACAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

CHRONIC PAIN; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DISCOGENIC PAIN; DISKITIS; DISKOGRAPHY; DRUG MEGADOSE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; INTERNAL DISK DISRUPTION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LOW BACK PAIN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINE FUSION;

ARTHROGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTICULAR; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; LOW BACK PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84857634361     PISSN: 15313433     EISSN: 15343081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-011-0239-6     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. K Lindblom 1951 Technique and results of diagnostic disc puncture and injection (discography) in the lumbar region Acta Orthop Scand 20 315 26 14894201 1:STN:280:DyaG38%2FisVeisw%3D%3D 10.3109/17453675108991178
2. K Lindblom 1950 Technique and results in myelography and disc puncture Acta Radiol 34 321 30 14799269 1:STN:280:DyaG3M%2FivVyiuw%3D%3D 10.3109/00016925009135278
3. L Manchikanti SE Glaser L Wolfer, et al. 2009 Systematic review of lumbar discography as a diagnostic test for chronic low back pain Pain Physician 12 541 59 19461822
4. Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK, et al: American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guideline Panel: Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1066-77.
5. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Chronic Pain Management, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2010 Practice guidelines for chronic pain management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Chronic Pain Management and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Anesthesiology 112 810 33 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c43103 These practice guidelines developed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine provide an up-to-date analysis of the evidence, with recommendations for both invasive and noninvasive treatments for pain
6. Martin BI, Turner JA, Mirza SK, et al: Trends in health care expenditures, utilization, and health status among US adults with spine problems, 1997-2006. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 2077-84.
7. BW Koes MW van Tulder S Thomas 2006 Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain BMJ 332 1430 4 16777886 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28zmtlSnuw%3D%3D 10.1136/bmj.332.7555.1430 (Pubitemid 44365323)
8. Cohen SP, Hurley RW: The ability of diagnostic spinal injections to predict surgical outcomes. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1756, 75, table of contents.
9. DK Resnick TF Choudhri AT Dailey, et al. 2005 American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6: magnetic resonance imaging and discography for patient selection for lumbar fusion J Neurosurg Spine 2 662 9 16028734 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0662
10. SD Boden PR McCowin DO Davis, et al. 1990 Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 1178 84 2398088 1:STN:280: DyaK3cznsFGltA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 20343163)
11. MC Jensen MN Brant-Zawadzki N Obuchowski, et al. 1994 Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain N Engl J Med 331 69 73 8208267 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3mvVGhtA%3D%3D 10.1056/NEJM199407143310201 (Pubitemid 24202220)
12. Saifuddin A, Braithwaite I, White J, et al: The value of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in the demonstration of annular tears. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:453-7. (Pubitemid 28117159)
13. Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S: 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: Lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2987-92.
14. KS Lam D Carlin RC Mulholland 2000 Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source Eur Spine J 9 36 41 10766075 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c3islWnsA%3D%3D 10.1007/s005860050006
15. C O'Neill DK Owens 2009 Lumbar facet joint pain: time to hit the reset button Spine J 9 619 22 19622412 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.017
16. RB North DH Kidd M Zahurak S Piantadosi 1996 Specificity of diagnostic nerve blocks: a prospective, randomized study of sciatica due to lumbosacral spine disease Pain 65 77 85 8826493 1:STN:280:DyaK28vitlyqsQ%3D%3D 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00170-0 (Pubitemid 26227691)
17. Siddall PJ, Cousins MJ: Spinal pain mechanisms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22: 98-104.
18. R Marks 1989 Distribution of pain provoked from lumbar facet joints and related structures during diagnostic spinal infiltration Pain 39 37 40 2530485 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FksFGrsw%3D%3D 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90173-5 (Pubitemid 19258908)
19. Slipman CW, Plastaras CT, Palmitier RA, et al: Symptom provocation of fluoroscopically guided cervical nerve root stimulation. Are dynatomal maps identical to dermatomal maps? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 2235-42. (Pubitemid 28485184)
20. ID Agorastides KS Lam BJ Freeman RC Mulholland 2002 The Adams classification for cadaveric discograms: inter- and intra-observer error in the clinical setting Eur Spine J 11 76 9 11931069 10.1007/s00586-001-0359-5 (Pubitemid 34169902)
21. Milette PC, Fontaine S, Lepanto L, et al: Differentiating lumbar disc protrusions, disc bulges, and discs with normal contour but abnormal signal intensity. Magnetic resonance imaging with discographic correlations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24: 44-53. (Pubitemid 29031281)
22. MA Adams P Dolan WC Hutton 1986 The stages of disc degeneration as revealed by discograms J Bone Joint Surg Br 68 36 41 3941139 1:STN:280:DyaL28%2Fos1Skuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 16156164)
23. EP Holt Jr 1968 The question of lumbar discography J Bone Joint Surg Am 50 720 6 5658557
24. JW Simmons CN Aprill AP Dwyer AE Brodsky 1988 A reassessment of Holt's data on: "The question of lumbar discography" Clin Orthop Relat Res 237 120 4 2973381 (Pubitemid 19016047)
25. LR Wolfer R Derby JE Lee SH Lee 2008 Systematic review of lumbar provocation discography in asymptomatic subjects with a meta-analysis of false-positive rates Pain Physician 11 513 38 18690280 This is an extensive review and meta-analysis on the published false-positive rates for discography
26. TR Walsh JN Weinstein KF Spratt, et al. 1990 Lumbar discography in normal subjects. A controlled, prospective study J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 1081 8 2384508 1:STN:280:DyaK3czks1ykug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 20279641)
27. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Yang B, et al: False-positive findings on lumbar discography. Reliability of subjective concordance assessment during provocative disc injection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:2542-7. (Pubitemid 30002992)
28. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Khurana S, et al: The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1373, 80; discussion 1381.
29. Carragee EJ, Chen Y, Tanner CM, et al: Provocative discography in patients after limited lumbar discectomy: A controlled, randomized study of pain response in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3065-71.
30. Block AR, Vanharanta H, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD: Discographic pain report. Influence of psychological factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:334-8. (Pubitemid 26055975)
31. DD Ohnmeiss H Vanharanta J Ekholm 1999 Relationship of pain drawings to invasive tests assessing intervertebral disc pathology Eur Spine J 8 126 31 10333151 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3mtl2ntA%3D%3D 10.1007/s005860050141 (Pubitemid 29217247)
32. MD Daubs AA Patel SE Willick, et al. 2010 Clinical impression versus standardized questionnaire: the spinal surgeon's ability to assess psychological distress J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 2878 83 21075972 10.2106/JBJS.I.01036 This study demonstrates the difficulties in assessing patients' psychological distress levels
33. Bogduk N. Practice Guidelines for Spinal Diagnostic and Treatment Procedures. 1st ed. San Francisco, California: International Spine Intervention Society; 2004.
34. Carragee EJ, Alamin TF, Carragee JM: Low-pressure positive Discography in subjects asymptomatic of significant low back pain illness. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:505-9.
35. O'Neill C, Kurgansky M: Subgroups of positive discs on discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2134-9. (Pubitemid 40353202)
36. D Kim R Wadley 2010 Variability in techniques and patient safety protocols in discography: a national multispecialty survey of International Spine Intervention Society members J Spinal Disord Tech 23 431 8 20124920 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b6444f
37. Derby R, Howard MW, Grant JM, et al: The ability of pressure-controlled discography to predict surgical and nonsurgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:364, 71; discussion 371-2.
38. Derby R, Lee SH, Kim BJ, et al: Pressure-controlled lumbar discography in volunteers without low back symptoms. Pain Med 2005;6:213, 21; discussion 222-4.
39. DA Shin HI Kim JH Jung, et al. 2006 Diagnostic relevance of pressure-controlled discography J Korean Med Sci 21 911 6 17043428 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.5.911
40. Shin DA, Kim SH, Han IB, et al: Factors influencing manometric pressure during pressure-controlled discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:E790-3.
41. WS Choi DA Shin HI Kim, et al. 2011 Toward more useful pressure-controlled discography: in vitro evaluation of injection speed, sensor location, and tube length Pain Med 12 36 44 21087408 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010. 00993.x This study highlights the importance of standardizing equipment utilized for the measurements of intradiscal pressures
42. R Derby SH Lee JE Lee SH Lee 2011 Comparison of pressure-controlled provocation discography using automated versus manual syringe pump manometry in patients with chronic low back pain Pain Med 12 18 26 21040439 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00990.x
43. • Hebelka H, Gaulitz A, Nilsson A, et al: The transfer of disc pressure to adjacent discs in discography: a specificity problem? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E1025-9. This study demonstrates how false-positive results may be a consequence of the stimulation of adjacent discs.
44. A Derincek A Mehbod K Schellhas, et al. 2007 Discography: can pain in a morphologically normal disc be due to an adjacent abnormal disc? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127 699 703 17576585 10.1007/s00402-007-0323-x (Pubitemid 47304830)
45. Heggeness MH, Doherty BJ: Discography causes end plate deflection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1050-3. (Pubitemid 23201493)
46. BJ Freeman R Mehdian 2008 Intradiscal electrothermal therapy, percutaneous discectomy, and nucleoplasty: what is the current evidence? Curr Pain Headache Rep 12 14 21 18417018 10.1007/s11916-008-0004-7 (Pubitemid 351247854)
47. BJ Freeman 2006 IDET: a critical appraisal of the evidence Eur Spine J 15 Suppl 3 S448 57 16868786 10.1007/s00586-006-0156-2 (Pubitemid 44371024)
48. Freeman BJ, Fraser RD, Cain CM, et al: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 2005;30:2369, 77; discussion 2378.
49. D Appleby G Andersson M Totta 2006 Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) Pain Med 7 308 16 16898940 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00172.x (Pubitemid 44102885)
50. KJ Pauza S Howell P Dreyfuss, et al. 2004 A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain Spine J 4 27 35 14749191 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.07. 001 (Pubitemid 38100898)
51. L Kapural A Ng J Dalton, et al. 2008 Intervertebral disc biacuplasty for the treatment of lumbar discogenic pain: results of a six-month follow-up Pain Med 9 60 7 18254768 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00407.x (Pubitemid 351228178)
52. PM Arnold S Robbins W Paullus, et al. 2009 Clinical outcomes of lumbar degenerative disc disease treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion allograft spacer: a prospective, multicenter trial with 2-year follow-up Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 38 E115 22
53. L Madigan AR Vaccaro LR Spector RA Milam 2009 Management of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disk disease J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17 102 11 19202123
54. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A: Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group: 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:2521, 32; discussion 2532-4.
55. P Fritzell O Hagg A Nordwall 2003 Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group: Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group Eur Spine J 12 178 89 12709856 (Pubitemid 36566771)
56. • Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, et al: Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1094-109. This review provides a detailed overview of the current level of evidence for surgical intervention for low back pain.
57. Mirza SK, Deyo RA: Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:816-23. (Pubitemid 46573336)
58. P Ekman H Moller A Shalabi, et al. 2009 A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration Eur Spine J 18 1175 86 19337757 10.1007/s00586-009-0947-3
59. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, et al: Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2119-26. (Pubitemid 47359619)
60. Gibson JN, Waddell G: Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (2): CD001352.
61. Maghout Juratli S, Franklin GM, Mirza SK, et al: Lumbar fusion outcomes in Washington State workers' compensation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2715-23. (Pubitemid 44673383)
62. SP Cohen TM Larkin SA Barna, et al. 2005 Lumbar discography: a comprehensive review of outcome studies, diagnostic accuracy, and principles Reg Anesth Pain Med 30 163 83 15765459 (Pubitemid 40576221)
63. E Colhoun IW McCall L Williams 1988 Cassar Pullicino VN: Provocation discography as a guide to planning operations on the spine J Bone Joint Surg Br 70 267 71 2964449 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7ltlylsw%3D%3D
64. BD Knox TM Chapman 1993 Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for discogram concordant pain J Spinal Disord 6 242 4 8347975 1:STN:280:DyaK3szltVertA%3D%3D 10.1097/00002517-199306030-00010 (Pubitemid 23154518)
65. Wetzel FT, LaRocca SH, Lowery GL, Aprill CN: The treatment of lumbar spinal pain syndromes diagnosed by discography. Lumbar arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:792-800. (Pubitemid 24111362)
66. S Madan M Gundanna JM Harley, et al. 2002 Does provocative discography screening of discogenic back pain improve surgical outcome? J Spinal Disord Tech 15 245 51 12131428 10.1097/00024720-200206000-00014
67. Gill K, Blumenthal SL: Functional results after anterior lumbar fusion at L5-S1 in patients with normal and abnormal MRI scans. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:940-2.
68. DK Resnick 2006 Evidence-based guidelines for the performance of lumbar fusion Clin Neurosurg 53 279 84 17380763
69. DK Resnick DG Malone TC Ryken 2002 Guidelines for the use of discography for the diagnosis of painful degenerative lumbar disc disease Neurosurg Focus 13 E12 15916396 10.3171/foc.2002.13.2.13
70. Smith SE, Darden BV, Rhyne AL, Wood KE: Outcome of unoperated discogram-positive low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1997, 2000; discussion 2000-1
71. Neal JM, Rathmell JP. Complications in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. Philadelphia: PA, Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 386.
72. •• Carragee EJ, Don AS, Hurwitz EL, et al: 2009 ISSLS Prize Winner: Does discography cause accelerated progression of degeneration changes in the lumbar disc: a ten-year matched cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2338-45. This study suggests that modern discography techniques using small needles and low pressures may result in accelerated disc degeneration.
73. Nassr A, Lee JY, Bashir RS, et al: Does incorrect level needle localization during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion lead to accelerated disc degeneration? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 189-92.
74. JC Iatridis AJ Michalek D Purmessur CL Korecki 2009 Localized Intervertebral Disc Injury Leads to Organ Level Changes in Structure, Cellularity, and Biosynthesis Cell Mol Bioeng 2 437 47 21179399 10.1007/s12195-009-0072-8 This article provides an up-to-date review on the influence of intervertebral disc injury on biomechanics, cellularity, inflammation, and biosynthesis
75. I Goldie 1958 Changes observed in the intervertebral disc after discography Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 42 193 7 13532690 1:STN:280: DyaG1c%2FnsFKisw%3D%3D 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1958.tb01731.x
76. I Goldie 1957 Invertebral disc changes after discography Acta Chir Scand 113 438 9 13507935 1:STN:280:DyaG1c%2FltVOhsw%3D%3D
77. Johnson RG: Does discography injure normal discs? An analysis of repeat discograms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:424-6. (Pubitemid 19129728)
78. Carragee EJ, Chen Y, Tanner CM, et al: Can discography cause long-term back symptoms in previously asymptomatic subjects? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1803-8. (Pubitemid 30469658)
79. CL Korecki JJ Costi JC Iatridis 2008 Needle puncture injury affects intervertebral disc mechanics and biology in an organ culture model Spine 33 235 41 18303454 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181624504 (Pubitemid 351322927)
80. Elliott DM, Yerramalli CS, Beckstein JC, et al: The effect of relative needle diameter in puncture and sham injection animal models of degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:588-96. (Pubitemid 351451719)
81. AJ Michalek MR Buckley LJ Bonassar, et al. 2010 The effects of needle puncture injury on microscale shear strain in the intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus Spine J 10 1098 105 20971041 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.09.015
82. Hsieh AH, Hwang D, Ryan DA, et al: Degenerative anular changes induced by puncture are associated with insufficiency of disc biomechanical function. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:998-1005.
83. G Keorochana JS Johnson CE Taghavi, et al. 2010 The effect of needle size inducing degeneration in the rat caudal disc: evaluation using radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, histology, and immunohistochemistry Spine J 10 1014 23 20970740 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.013
84. Ohtori S, Kinoshita T, Yamashita M, et al: Results of surgery for discogenic low back pain: a randomized study using discography versus discoblock for diagnosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1345-8.
85. H Lee G Sowa N Vo, et al. 2010 Effect of bupivacaine on intervertebral disc cell viability Spine J 10 159 66 19800297 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.445 This is an in vitro study suggesting that injectates, such as bupivacaine, utilized during analgesic discography may pose a risk to the intervertebral disc health
86. Hoelscher GL, Gruber HE, Coldham G, et al: Effects of very high antibiotic concentrations on human intervertebral disc cell proliferation, viability, and metabolism in vitro. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1871-7. (Pubitemid 30626064)