Replacement of highly educated surgical assistants by robot technology in working life: Paradigm shift in the service sector

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 431-438

  Wasen, Kristian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Health care robotics; Human robot interaction; Organization science; Robots as surrogate artificial work partners; Service robots; User acceptance

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS; SERVICE INDUSTRY; SOCIAL ROBOTS; SURGERY;

HEALTHCARE SECTORS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI); ORGANIZATION SCIENCE; PROFESSIONAL USERS; SERVICE ROBOTS; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; SURGICAL APPLICATIONS; USER ACCEPTANCE;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

EID: 84857632220     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-010-0062-y     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B (2009) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot 1(4):319-330
2. Wasen K (2005) Person-friendly robot interaction: social, psychological and technological issues in health care work. In: Proc 14th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, August 13-15, Nashville, USA, pp 643-648
3. Kiesler S, Hinds P (2004) Introduction to this special issue on human-robot interaction. Hum-Comput Interact 19:1-8
4. Wasen K (2004) Multi-disciplinary socio-technical management: integrating robot technology and management issues. In: Proceedings, IEEE 21st international symposium on automation and robotics in construction, September 21-25, Jeju, South Korea, pp 21-24
5. Fox NJ (1992) The social meaning of surgery. Open University Press, Milton Keynes
6. Conger K (2004) Remote control. Stanf Med Mag. Online edition http://mednews.stanford.edu/stanmed/2004Spring/robots.html
7. Severinson-Eklundh K, Green A, Huttenrauch H (2003) Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robot Auton Syst 42(3-4):223-234
8. Yanco HA, Drury JL, Scholtz J (2004) Beyond usability evaluation: analysis of human-robot interaction at a major robotics competition. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1-2):117-149
9. Weiss A, Wurhofer D, Lankes M, Tscheligi M (2009) Autonomous vs. tele-operated: how people perceive human-robot collaboration with HRP-2. In: Proc of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, March 11-13, La Jolla, California, USA, pp 257-258
10. Young JE, Hawkins R, Sharlin E, Igarashi T (2009) Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):95-108
11. Wasen K (2008) Robotkirurgisk Tjansteproduktion-Distanserad Narhet. Doctoral thesis in Swedish with English summary: Robot surgery-remote closeness providing a new method of human-robot interaction within top-level service production, University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and Law
12. Dautenhahn K (2004) Robots we like to live with?!-A developmental perspective on a personalized, life-long robot companion. In: Proceedings IEEE Roman 2004, 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 20-22 September 2004, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan. IEEE Press, New York, pp 17-22
13. Haasch A, Hohenner S, Hüwel S, Kleinehagenbrock M, Lang S, Toptsis I, Fink GA, Fritsch J, Wrede B, Sagerer G (2004) BIRON-the bielefeld robot companion. In: Prassler E, Law-itzky G, Fiorini P, Hägele M (eds) Proc international workshop on advances in service robotics, Stuttgart, Germany, May 2004. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 27-32.
14. Wrede B, Haasch A, Hofemann N, Hohenner S, Hüwel S, Kleine-hagenbrock M, Lang S, Li S, Toptsis I, Fink GA, Fritsch J, Sagerer G (2004) Research issues for designing robot companions: BIRON as a case study. In: Proc IEEE conference on mecha-tronics & robotics
15. Breazeal C, Buchsbaum D, Gray J, Gatenby D, Blumberg B (2005) Learning from and about others: towards using imitation to bootstrap the social understanding of others by robots. Artif Life 11(1-2):31-62
16. Nakauchi Y, Simmons R (2002) A social robot that stands in line. Auton Robots 12(3):313-324
17. Hinds PJ, Roberts TL, Jones H (2004) Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Hum Comput Interact 17:151-181
18. Marble JL, Bruemmer DJ, Few DA, Dudenhoeffer DD (2004). Evaluation of supervisory vs. peer-peer interaction for human-robot teams. In: Proc 37th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, January 4-8, Big Island, Hawaii
19. Yanco AY, Drury J (2004) Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy. In: Proc IEEE int conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol 3, 10-13 October, pp 2841-2846
20. Salter T, Dautenhahn K, Boekhorst R (2006) Learning about natural human-robot interaction styles. Robot Auton Syst 54(2):127-134
21. Kuzuoka H, Furusawa Y, Kobayashi N, Yamazaki K (2007) Effect of displaying a remote operator's face on a media robot. In: Int conference on control, automation and systems, vol 1-6, 17-20 October, pp 2409-2412
22. Bicionek SR (1995) Agent systems that negotiate and learn. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 42:265-288
23. Hauptmann AG, Rudnicky AI (1988) Talking to computers: an empirical investigation. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 28:583-604
24. Nass C, Moon Y (2000) Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J Soc Issues 56(1):81-103
25. Nass C, Steuer J, Henriksen L, Dryer DC (1994) Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: performance assessments of computers subsequent to "self"- or "other"-evaluations. Int J Hum Com-put Stud 40:543-559
26. Murphy RR (2004) Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 34(2):138-153
27. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, London
28. Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New Yo r k
29. Patton M (1980) Qualitative evaluation methods. Sage, London
30. van Maanen J (1988) Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
31. Hemal AK, Menon M (2002) Laparoscopy, robot, telesurgery and urology: future perspective. E-Medicine 48(1):39-41
32. Aanestad M, Edwin B, Marvik R (2003) Medical image quality as a socio-technical phenomenon. Methods Inf Med 42:302-306
33. Mondada L (2003) Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions. Vis Stud 18:58-73