Perspectives on CCS cost and economics

SPE Economics and Management

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 24-31

  Kheshgi, H S ^a   Thomann, H ^a   Bhore, N A ^b   Hirsch, R B ^c   Parker, M E ^d   Teletzke, G F ^b  

^a ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company's Corporate Strategic Research ^*  (United States)

^b EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

^c ExxonMobil Gas and Power Marketing Company   (United States)

^d ExxonMobil Production Co   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; COMBUSTION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST ESTIMATING; ECONOMICS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENHANCED RECOVERY; FUEL STORAGE; GAS PRODUCERS; GREENHOUSE GASES; NATURAL GAS; NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS; NATURAL GASOLINE PLANTS;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); CO2 EMISSION REDUCTION; ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY; GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG); NATURAL GAS PROCESSING; NATURAL GAS PROCESSING INDUSTRY; NATURAL GAS RESOURCES; POWER GENERATION PLANTS;

CARBON CAPTURE;

EID: 84857618978     PISSN: 21501173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2118/139716-PA     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Al-Juaied, M. and Whitmore, A. 2009. Realistic Costs of Carbon Capture. Discussion Paper 2009-08, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (July 2009), http://www.osti.gov/ bridge/servlets/purl/960194-GpDT0k/960194.pdf.
2. 2 EOR Field Tests, 1972-1987. Paper SPE 18977 presented at the Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 6-8 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18977-MS.
3. Burgers, W.F.J., Northrop, P.S., Kheshgi, H.S., and Valencia, J.A. 2010. Worldwide development potential for sour gas. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT 10), Amsterdam, 19-23 September.
4. Connors, S.R., Hezir, J.S., McRae, G.S., Michaels, H., and Ruppel, C. 2010. The Future of Natural Gas: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
5. DECC. 2010. UK Electricity Generation Costs Update. Assessment Summary Report, Department of Energy & Climate Change (DECC)/Mott MacDonald, Brighton, United Kingdom (June 2010), http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/ Statistics/Projections/71-uk-electricity-generation-costs-update-.pdf.
6. Duke Energy. 2010. Duke Energy: Edwardsport IGCC Plant to Cost 23% More. POWERnews, 21 April 2010, http://www.powermag.com/POWERnews/Duke-Energy- Edwardsport-IGCC-Plant-to-Cost-23-percent-More-2639.html.
7. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2010a. Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2010. Electricity Market Module. Annual Report No. DOE/EIA-0554(2010), US DOE/EIA, Washington, DC (9 April 2010). http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/electricity.html.
8. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2010b. Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Electricity Generation Plants. Annual Report, Office of Energy Analysis, US DOE/EIA, Washington DC (November 2010), http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/ beck-plantcosts/pdf/updatedplantcosts.pdf.
9. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2010c. Electric Power Monthly. Monthly Report No. DOE/EIA-0226 (2010/02), Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels, US DOE/EIA, Washington, DC (February 2010), http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/archive/pdf/02261002.pdf.
10. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2010. Report of the Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage. Final Report, US DOE/EPA, Washington, DC (August 2010), http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/downloads/CCS-Task-Force- Report-2010.pdf.
11. 2 capture technology-The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2 (1): 9-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1.
12. Flannery, B.P. and Kheshgi, H.S. 2004. An industry perspective on successful development and global commercialization of innovative technologies for GHG mitigation. Paper presented at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Workshop on Industry Technology Development, Transfer and Diffusion, Tokyo, 21-23 September.
13. Global CCS Institute. 2011. The Global Status of CCS: 2010. Annual Report, Global CCS Institute, Canberra, Australia (8 March 2011), http://cdn.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/publications/12776/ global-status-ccs-2010.pdf.
14. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2010. Coal Power Plants: Opportunities Exist for DOE to Provide Better Information on the Maturity of Key Technologies to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Report to Congressional Requesters No. GAO-10-675, US GAO, Washington, DC (June 2010), 69, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10675.pdf.
15. Grubler, A. 2009. An assessment of the costs of the French nuclear PWR program 1970-2000. IIASA Interim Report IR-09-036, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (6 October 2009), http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Documents/IR-09-036.pdf.
16. Hamilton, M.R., Herzog, H.J., and Parsons, J.E. 2009. Cost and U.S. public policy for new coal power plants with carbon capture and sequestration. Energy Procedia 1 (1): 4487-4494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02. 266.
17. 2 Flooding Conference, Midland, Texas, USA, 9-10 December.
18. Herzog, H., Smekens, K., Dadhich, P., et al. 2005. Cost and economic potential. In IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, ed. B. Metz, O. Davidson, H.D. Coninck, M. Loos, and L. Meyer, 442. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. IEA and OECD-NEA. 2010. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity, 2010 edition. Paris, France: International Energy Agency (IEA).
20. 2 Capture and Storage, 252. Paris, France: International Energy Agency (IEA)/OECD.
21. IEA. 2009. Power generation in the 450 scenario. In World Energy Outlook 2009, Chap. 7. Paris, France: International Energy Agency (IEA). http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2009/weo2009.pdf.
22. IHS CERA. 2009. Capital Costs Analysis Forum-North American Power, http://www.ihs.com/products/energy-capital-costs-analysis/north-american-power. aspx.
23. IHS CERA. 2010. Fueling North America's Energy Future: The Unconventional Natural Gas Revolution and the Carbon Agenda. Final Report, IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 105.
24. IHS CERA. 2011. Cost Fundamentals: Clean Technology Advancement. Appendix: Cost and Performance Assumptions, Spring 2011. Final Report, IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
25. Kaplan, S. 2008. Power Plants: Characteristics and Costs. CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL34746, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC (13 November 2008), http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34746.pdf.
26. Kelley, B.T., Valencia, J.A., Northrop, P.S., and Mart, C.J. 2010. Controlled Freeze Zone" Technology for Developing Sour Gas Reserves. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Amsterdam, 19-23 September.
27. 2 from ethanol production. Energy 30 (10): 1865-1871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.11.004.
28. Markandya, A., Halsnaes, K., Lanza, A. et al. 2001. Costing Methodologies. In Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, ed. B. Metz, Chap. 7, 451-487. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Coninck, H.D., Loos, M., and Meyer, L. ed. 2005. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. MIT. 2007. The Future of Coal: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://web.mit.edu/coal/ The-Future-of-Coal.pdf
31. 2 Management at ExxonMobil's LaBarge Field, Wyoming, USA. Paper IPTC 13258 presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, 7-9 December. http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/13258-MS.
32. Power Engineering. 2010. IGCCcostwrap. Power-Eng, 19 March 2010, http://www.power-eng.com/articles/2010/03/igcc-cost-wrap.html. (formerly "IGCC power plant cost top $5,500/kW," Power-Gen Worldwide)
33. PowerAdvocate. 2010. Annual Capital Investment Report (26 February 2010). PowerAdvocate Cost Intelligence, http://marketing.poweradvocate.com/cost.
34. 2 Capture Systems Using Historical Experience Curves. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), Trondheim, Norway, 19-22 June.
35. 2 capture. In Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 5-9 September 2004, Vancouver, Canada, ed. M. Wilson, T. Morris, J. Gale, and K. Thambimithu, Vol. 2, 1059-1066. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
36. 2 Emissions Reductions, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 23 March 2009.
37. 2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization, San Diego, California, USA, 2-4 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/126446-MS.
38. 2. In IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, ed. B. Metz, O. Davidson, H.D. Coninck, M. Loos, and L. Meyer, Chap. 3, 106-178. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc-wg3.de/publications/ special-reports/.files-images/SRCCS-Chapter3.pdf.
39. 2 capture for refineries, a practical approach. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4 (2): 316-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ijggc.2009.09.022.
40. Ventyx. 2010. North American Power Reference Case. Presented at the 2010 Spring Workshop, New York, 21 May.
41. 2 Containing Impurities for Miscible Enhanced Oil Recovery. Paper SPE 131003 presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, 8-10 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/131003-MS.
42. Woods, M.C., Capicotto, P.J., Haslbeck, J.L. et al. 2007. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants. Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity. Final Report DOE/NETL-2007/1281, National Energy Technology Laboratory, US DOE, Washington, DC (May 2007), http://www.purdue.edu/ discoverypark/energy/assets/pdfs/cctr/NETL-BituminousReport-2007.pdf.
43. WorleyParsons. 2009. Strategic Analysis of the Global Status of Carbon and Storage. Report 2: Economic Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies. Final Report, Global CCS Institute, Canberra, Australia (May 2009). http://cdn.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/publications/5751/ report-2-economic-assessment-carbon-capture-and-storage-technologies.pdf
44. Yeh, S. and Rubin, E.S. 2010. Uncertainties in Technology Experience Curves for Energy-Economic Models. Proc., NAS Workshop on Assessing the Economic Impacts of Climate Change, April 2010, 76-91.