Sequestration of fermentation CO2 from ethanol production

Energy

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1865-1871

  Kheshgi, Haroon S ^a   Prince, Roger C ^a  

^a EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GASOLINE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

EMISSION OFFSETS; OFF-GASES; SEQUESTRATION; TRANSPORTATION FUELS;

INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ETHANOL;

EID: 12444340783     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 2. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, Van der Linden PJ, Xiaosu D, Maskell K, Johnson CA, editors. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis: contribution of WGI to the third assessment report of the IPCC. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 183-237.
2. Bolin B, Sukumar R, Ciais P, Cramer W, Jarvis P, Kheshgi H, et al. Global perspective. In: Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ, editors. Land use, land-use change, and forestry: a special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 23-51.
3. Hoffert MI, Caldeira K, Benford G, Criswell DR, Green C, Herzog H, et al. Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: energy for a greenhouse planet. Science 2002;298:981-7.
4. OECD/IEA. World energy outlook. Paris: OECD; 2002.
5. Davis SC, Diegel SW. Transportation energy databook: edition 22. Oak Ridge, TN: Center for Transportation analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2002.
6. Kheshgi HS, Prince RC, Marland G. The potential of biomass fuels in the context of global climate change: focus on transportation fuels. Annu Rev Energy Environ 2000;25:199-244.
7. Berndes G. Bioenergy and water - the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply. Biomass Bioenergy 2002;12:253-71.
8. Edmonds JA, Freund P, Dooley JJ. The role of carbon management technologies in addressing atmospheric stabilization of greenhouse gases. In: Williams D, Dune B, McMullan P, Paulson C, Smith A, editors. Greenhouse gas control technologies: proceedings of the fifth international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies. VIC, Australia: Collingwood; 2001. p. 46-51.
9. Lake LW. Enhanced oil recovery. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1989.
10. 2 geological sequestration in sedimentary basins. In: Second annual conference on carbon sequestration. Washington, DC: National Energy Technology Laboratory, United States Department of Energy; 2003.
11. Herzog H, Eliasson B, Kaarstad O. Capturing greenhouse gases. Sci Am 2000;72-9.
12. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme. Putting carbon back in the ground IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Stoke Orchard, Cheltenham, UK; 2001http://www.ieagreen.org.uk/index.htm.
13. 2 emissions from production and combustion of fuel ethanol from corn. Energy 1991; 16(11/12):1307-16.
14. Shapouri H, Duffield JA, Wang M. Estimating the net energy balance of corn ethanol. Agricultural economic report number 813. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture; 2002.
15. Renewable Fuels Association US fuel ethanol production capacity. Renewable Fuels Association, Washington, DC; 2003http//www/ethanolrfa.org/eth_prod_fac.html.
16. Ribeiro SK. Biofuels. In: Transportation and climate change. International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association, Baltimore, MD; 2004 See also http//www.ipieca.org.
17. 2 emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 2003;25:273-85.
18. 2-ECBM (1). In: Gale J, Kaya Y, editors. Greenhouse gas control technologies, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Pergamon; 2003, p. 639-44.
19. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme. Greenhouse gas emissions from power stations IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Stoke Orchard, Cheltenham,UK; 1993http://www.ieagreen.org.uk/index.htm.
20. 2: two for the price of one?. In: Gale J, Kaya Y, editors. Greenhouse gas control technologies, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Pergamon; 2003. p. 1371-6.
21. 2 storage: European sector. Seventh international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Vancouver 2004.
22. EUCAR, CONCAWE, JRC, 2004. Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context. European commission joint research council. See also: http://ies.jrc.cec.eu.int/Download/eh.
23. Berndes G, Hoogwijk M, Van den Broek R. The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies. Biomass Bioenergy 2003;25:1-28.
24. National Research Council. Review of the research strategy for biomass-derived transportation fuels. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
25. Lave LB, Griffin WM, MacLean H. The ethanol answer to carbon emissions. Issues in science and technology online, winter; 2001. http://www.nap.edu/issues/18.12/lave.html.
26. Kheshgi HS. Ethanol for transportation. Issues in science and technology online, spring; 2002. http://www.nap.edu/issues/18.13/forum.html.
27. Heaton EA, Clifton-Brown J, Voigt TB, Jones MB, Long SP. Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: European Union experience and projections for Illinois. Mitigation Adapt Strat Global Change 2004;9:433-51.
28. Flannery BP, Kheshgi HS, An industry perspective on successful development and global commercialization of innovative technologies for GHG mitigation. In: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change workshop on industry technology development, transfer and diffusion, IPCC, 2004.
29. Wang M. Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - North American analysis, Argonne National Laboratory; 2001. http://www.ipd.anl.gov/anlpubs/2001/04/39097.pdf.
30. Hendriks CA, Blok K, Turkenburg WC. Technology and cost of recovering and storing carbon dioxide from an integrated-gasifier, combined-cycle plant. Energy Int J 1991;16:1277-93.