Innovation in Distributed Teams: The Duality of Connectivity Norms and Human Agency

New Ways of Organizing Work: Developments, Perspectives, and Experiences

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 140-159

  Collins, Paul ^a   Kolb, Darl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BOTHELL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857549674     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203357354-15     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Bandura, A. 2000. Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9(3), 75-78.
2. Bandura, A. 2006. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science 1(2), 164-180.
3. Baron, N. S. 2008. Always on: Language in an online, and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. 1967. The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books.
5. Bettenhausen, K. & Murnighan, J. K. 1985. The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly 30(3), 350-372.
6. Boudreau, M.-C., Loch, K. D., Robey, D. & Straud, D. 1998. Going global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization. The Academy of Management Executive 12(4), 120-128.
7. Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. 2000. The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. AMR Academy of Management Review 20(2), 343-378.
9. Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
10. Carr, N. 2010. The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember London: Atlantic.
11. Clark, K. B. & Wheelwright, S. C. 1992. Organizing and leading “heavyweight “development teams. CMR California Management Review 34(3), 9-28.
12. Cousins, K. C. & Robey, D. 2005. Human agency in a wireless world: Patterns of technology use in nomadic computing environments. Information and Organization 15(2), 151-180.
13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollinsPublishers.
14. Daft, R. & Lengel L. 1986. Organisational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Managment Science 32(5), 554-571.
15. DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M. S. 1994. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121-147.
16. Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology 103(4), 962-1023.
17. Feldman, D. C. 1984. The development and enforcement of group norms. The Academy of Management Review 9(1), 47-53.
18. Gibson, C. B. & Gibbs, J. L. 2006. Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 51(3), 451-495.
19. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford: Polity Press.
20. Hinds, P. J. & Mortensen, M. 2005. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science 16(3), 290-307.
21. Kiesler, S., Seigel, J. & McGuire, T. W. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39, 1123-1134.
22. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E. & Gibson, C. B. 2004. The impact of empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating effect of face-to- face interaction. Academy of Management Journal 47(2), 175-192.
23. Kolb, D. G. 2008. Exploring the connectivity metaphor: Attributes, dimensions and duality. [theory]. Organization Studies 29(1), 127-144.
24. Kolb, D. G., Collins, P. D. & Lind, E. A. 2008. Requisite connectivity: Finding flow in a not-so-flat world. Organizational Dynamics 37(2), 181-189.
25. Maznevski, M. L. & Chudoba, K. M. 2000. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science 11(5), 473-492.
26. Morgan, J. M. & Liker, J. K. 2006. The Toyota product development system: Integrating people, process, and technology. New York: Productivity Press.
27. Murphy, P. 2007. You are wasting my time: Why limits on connectivity are essential for economies of creativity. University of Auckland Business Review 9(2), 17-26.
28. Nardi, B. A. & Whittaker, S. 2002. The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In Distributed work. Eds. P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 83-110.
29. Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. 2000. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction 15(2/3), 139-179.
30. Olson, J., Teasley, S., Covi, L. & Olson, G. 2002. The (currently) unique advantages of collocated work. In Distributed Work. Eds. P. Hinds & S. Kiesler. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 113-135.
31. Orlikowski, W. J. 1992. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398-427.
32. Pinch, T. & Bijker, W. 1984. The social construction of facts and artifacts. Social Studies of Science 14, 399-441.
33. Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Lea, M. 2000. The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research 26(3), 341.
34. Sawyer, R. K. 2008. Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York; London: BasicBooks; Perseus Running [distributor].
35. Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone.
36. Woolgar, S. (Ed.). 2002. Virtual society?: Technology, cyberbole, reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Wyatt, S., Thomas, G. & Terranova, T. 2002. They came, they surfed, they went back to the beach: Conceptualizing use and non-use of the Internet. In Virtual Society?: Technology, cyberbole, reality. Ed. S. Woolgars. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23-40.