Transfer of motor learning engages specific neural substrates during motor memory consolidation dependent on the practice structure

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 499-507

  Kantak, Shailesh S ^a   Sullivan, Katherine J ^a   Fisher, Beth E ^a   Knowlton, Barbara J ^b   Winstein, Carolee J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

consolidation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; transfer of learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84857547110     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: 19401027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2011.632657     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Cross, E. S., Schmitt, P. J.,&Grafton, S. T. (2007). Neural substrates of contextual interference during motor learning support a model of active preparation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1854-1871. (Pubitemid 350043428)
2. Fuster, J. M. (2000). Executive frontal functions. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 66-70. (Pubitemid 30411658)
3. Galea, J. M., & Celnik, P. (2009). Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 294-301.
4. Galea, J. M., Vazquez, A., Pasricha, N., Orban de Xivry, J. J., & Celnik, P. (2010). Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: The motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1761-1770.
5. Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212-224. (Pubitemid 38580119)
6. Hall, K. G., & Magill, R. A. (1995). Variability of practice and contextual interference in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 299-309. (Pubitemid 26057943)
7. Kantak, S. S., Fisher, B. E., Sullivan, K. J.,&Winstein, C. J. (2010). Effects of different doses of low frequency rTMS on motor cortical excitability. Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology, 1(102). doi: 10.4172/2155-9562.1000102
8. Kantak, S. S., Sullivan, K. J., Fisher, B. E., Knowlton, B. J., & Winstein, C. J. (2010). Neural substrates of motor memory consolidation depend on practice structure. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 923-925.
9. Lee, T. D., & Simon, D. (2003). Contextual interference. Information processing perspectives. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 29-44). London: Routledge.
10. Luft, A. R., Buitrago, M. M., Ringer, T., Dichgans, J., & Schulz, J. B. (2004). Motor skill learning depends on protein synthesis in motor cortex after training. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6515-6520. (Pubitemid 38971699)
11. Muellbacher, W., Ziemann, U., Wissel, J., Dang, N., Kofler, M., Facchini, S.,et al. (2002). Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex. Nature, 415, 640-644. (Pubitemid 34136390)
12. Pochon, J. B., Levy, R., Poline, J. B., Crozier, S., Lehericy, S., Pillon, B.,et al. (2001). The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the preparation of forthcoming actions: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 260-266. (Pubitemid 32199646)
13. Rowe, J. B., Toni, I., Josephs, O., Frackowiak, R. S., & Passingham, R. E. (2000). The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within workingmemory? Science, 288, 1656-1660. (Pubitemid 30387434)
14. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualization of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
15. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Human Kinetics.
16. Seidler, R. D. (2010). Neural correlates of motor learning, transfer of learning, and learning to learn. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 38, 3-9.
17. Seidler, R. D., & Noll, D. C. (2008). Neuroanatomical correlates of motor acquisition and motor transfer. Journal of Neurophysiology, 99, 1836-1845. (Pubitemid 351550077)
18. Shadmehr, R., & Brashers-Krug, T. (1997). Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 409-419. (Pubitemid 27008880)
19. Shea, C. H., & Kohl, R. M. (1990). Specificity and variability of practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 169-177.
20. Shea, C. H., & Kohl, R. M. (1991). Composition of practice: influence on the retention of motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 187-195.
21. Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Wright, D. L., Immink, M., & Black, C. (2001). Consistent and variable practice conditions: effects on relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 139-152. (Pubitemid 32494512)
22. Sherwood, D. E., & Lee, T. D. (2003). Schema theory: critical review and implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 376-382. (Pubitemid 44530753)
23. Weekly, A. (2004). TEMPLATE [computer software]. Garden Grove, CA: Weekly Consulting.
24. Wulf, G., & Lee, T. D. (1993). Contextual interference in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 254-263.
25. Wymbs, N. F.,&Grafton, S. T. (2009). Neural substrates of practice structure that support future off-line learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 2462-2476.