Leadership in Multiple Perpetrator Stranger Rape

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 728-752

  Woodhams, Jessica ^a   Cooke, Claire ^b   Harkins, Leigh ^a   da Silva, Teresa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLOUCESTERSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

authority; dominance; gang rape; group rape; influence

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RAPE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RAPE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857535672     PISSN: 08862605     EISSN: 15526518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0886260511423244     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amir M.Forcible rape.Federal Probation. 1967;31:51-58.
2. Amir M.Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1971:.
3. Bilbow G.T. Look who's talking: An analysis of "chair-talk" in business meetings. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 1998;12:157-197.
4. Bijleveld C.C. J. H., & Hendriks J. Juvenile sex offenders: Differences between group and solo offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law. 2003;9: 237-245.
5. Bijleveld C.C. J. H., Weerman F.M., Looije D., & Hendriks J. Group sex offending by juveniles: Coercive sex as a group activity. European Journal of Criminology. 2007;4:5-31.
6. Blanchard W.H. The group process in gang rape.Journal of Social Psychology. 1959;49:259-266.
7. Dyborg J., Warborg-Larsen F., Nielson S., Byman J., Buhl-Nielson B., & Guatrè-Delay F. The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Global Assessment of Psychosocial Disability (GAPD) in clinical practice: Substance and reliability as judged by intraclass correlations. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2000;9:195-201.
8. Etgar T., & Prager K.G. Advantages of group therapy for adolescent participants in the same gang rape.Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 2009;18:302-319.
9. Franiuk R.,Seefelt J.L., & Vandello J.A. Prevalence of rape myths in headlines and their effects on attitudes towards rape. Sex Roles. 2008;58: 790-801.
10. Franklin K. Enacting masculinity: Antigay violence and group rape as participatory theatre. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2004; 1:25-40.
11. Gidycz C.A., & Koss M.P.A comparison of group and individual sexual assault victims.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1990;14:325-342.
12. Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2001; 40:1337-1345.
13. Groth A.N.,& Birnbaum H.J. Men who rape: The psychology of the offender. London, UK: Plenum; 1990:.
14. Harkins L., & Dixon L. Sexual offending in groups: An evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behaviour. 2010;15:87-99.
15. Hartman C.A., Luteijn E., Serra M., & Minderaa R. Refinement of the Children's Social Behaviour Questionnaire (CSBQ): An instrument that describes the diverse problems seen in milder forms of PDD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2006;36:325-342.
16. Hauffe S., & Porter L. An interpersonal comparison of lone and group rape offences. Psychology, Crime and Law. 2009;15:469-491.
17. Her Majesty's Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate. A report on the joint inspection into the investigation and prosecution of cases involving allegations of rape. London, UK: Author; 2002:.
18. Horvath M.A. H., & Kelly L. Multiple perpetrator rape: Naming an offence and initial research findings. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 2009;15:83-96.
19. Leech G.N. Principles of pragmatics. London, UK: Longman; 1983:.
20. Lievore D. Prosecutorial decisions in adult sexual assault cases: An Australian study. Canberra, Australia: Office of the Status of Women; 2004:.
21. Morand D.A. Language and power: An empirical analysis of linguistic strategies used in superior-subordinate communication. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. 2000;21:235-248.
22. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press. 2007:.
23. Porter L.E. Using archival data and multidimensional scaling to explore leadership: Examples from group crime. Issues in Forensic Psychology. 2008; 8:31-42.
24. Porter L.E., & Alison L.J. A partially ordered scale of influence in violent group behaviour: An example from gang rape. Small Group Research. 2001;32:475-497.
25. Porter L.E., & Alison L.J. Leadership and hierarchies in criminal groups: Scaling degrees of leader behaviour in group robbery. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2006;11:245-265.
26. Takano S. Re-examining linguistic power: Strategic use of directives by professional Japanese women in positions of authority and leadership. Journal of Pragmatics. 2005; 37:633-666.
27. 't Hart-Kerkhoffs L.A., van Wijk A., Bullens R., & Doreleijers T. Screening van jeugdige zedendelinquenten [Screening of juvenile sex offenders] Facetten van zedencriminaliteit. Bullens R. Klerks P. & van Wijk A., ed. The Hague, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2006: pp. 267-275.
28. 't Hart-Kerkhoffs L.A., Vermeiren R.R. J. M., Jansen L.M. C., & Doreleijers T.A. H. Juvenile group sex offenders: A comparison of group leaders and followers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2011;26 (1): 3-20.
29. Ullman S.E. Comparing gang and individual rapes in a community sample of urban women. Violence and Victims. 2007;22:43-51.
30. van Wijk A. Ph.,'t Hart L.A., Doreleijers Th. A. H., & Bullens R.A. R. Ontwikkeling screeningsinstrument voor jeugdige zedendelinquenten [Development of a screening device for juvenile sex offenders]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: VU Medical Center/VU; 2005:.
31. Vetten L., & Haffejee S. Gang rape: A study in inner-city Johannesburg. South Africa Crime Quarterly. 2005;12:31-36.
32. Vine B. Directives at work: Exploring the contextual complexity of workplace directives. Journal of Pragmatics. 2009;41:1395-1405.
33. Woodhams J. Characteristics of juvenile sex offending against strangers: Findings from a non-clinical study. Aggressive Behaviour. 2004;30:243-253.
34. Woodhams J., Gillett R., & Grant T. Understanding the factors that affect the severity of juvenile stranger sex offences: The effect of victim characteristics and number of suspects. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2007;22:218-237.
35. Woodhams J., & Grant T. Developing a categorization system for rapists' speech. Psychology, Crime and Law. 2006;22:245-260.