Juvenile group sex offenders: A comparison of group leaders and followers

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-20

  't Hart Kerkhoffs, Lisette A ^a   Vermeiren, Robert R J M ^a,b   Jansen, Lucres M C ^a   Doreleijers, Theo A H ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Offenders; Recidivism; Sexual assault; Violent offenders

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTELLIGENCE; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; LEADERSHIP; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; ROLE PLAYING; SEXUAL CRIME; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; LEADERSHIP; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY; ROLE; SEX OFFENSES; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 78650694956     PISSN: 08862605     EISSN: 15526518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0886260510362882     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Bailey, S., Doreleijers, T., & Tarbuck, P. (2006). Recent developments in mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice systems. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15, 391-406.
3. Becker, J.V., & Kaplan, M.S. (1988). Assessment of adolescent sexual offenders. In R. J. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families (pp. 97-118). Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
4. Bijleveld, C., & Hendriks, J. (2003). Juvenile sex offenders: Differences between group and solo offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 237-245.
5. Bijleveld, C.J.H., Weerman, F.H., Looije, D., & Hendriks, J. (2007). Group sex offending by juveniles: Coercive sex as a group activity. European Journal of Criminology, 4, 5-31.
6. Bruinsma, F. (1996). De jeugdige zedendelinquent [The juvenile sex offender]. Utrecht, Netherlands: SWP.
7. Caldwell, M.F. (2002). What we do not know about juvenile sexual reoffense risk. Child Maltreat, 7, 291-302.
8. De Wree, E. (2004). Daders van groepsverkrachting-een daderprofiel in maatschappelijke context [Group perpetrators of sex rape: A profile of the perpetrator in a societal context]. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn, Netherlands: Maklu.
9. Doreleijers, Th. A. H., Bijl, B., van Loosbroek, E., Vermeiren, R., & van der Veldt, M.C. (in press). The BARO: A juvenile offender screening instrument.
10. Doreleijers, Th. A. H., & Spaander, M. (2002). The development and implementation of the BARO: A new device to detect psychopathology in minors with first police contacts. In R. R. Corrado, R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. K. Gierowski (Eds.), Multi-problem violent youth: A foundation for comparative research on needs, interventions and outcome (pp. 232-240). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
11. Frenken, J. (1995). De verkrachter bestaat niet [The rapist does not exist]. Maandblad voor Geestelijke Gezondheidszorg, 9, 944-957.
12. Gidycz, C.A., & Koss, M.P. (1990). A Comparison of group and individual sexual assault victims. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 325-342.
13. Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345.
14. 't Hart-Kerkhoffs, L.A., van Wijk, A., Bullens, R., & Doreleijers, T. (2006). Screening van jeugdige zedendelinquenten [Screening of juvenile sex offenders]. In R. Bullens, P. Klerks, & A. van Wijk (Eds.), Facetten van zedencriminaliteit. (pp. 267-275). The Hague, Netherlands: Elsevier.
15. Hartman, C.A., Luteijn, E., Serra, M., & Minderaa, R. (2006). Refinement of the Children's Social Behavior Questionnaire (CSBQ): An instrument that describes the diverse problems seen in milder forms of PDD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 325-342.
16. Hochstetler, A. (2001). Opportunities and decisions in interactional dynamics in robbery and burglary groups. Criminology, 39, 737-764.
17. Klein, M., Kerner, H., Maxson, C., & Weitekamp, E. (2001). The Eurogang paradox. Street gangs and youth groups in the U.S. and Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
18. Knight, R.A., & Prentky, R.A. (1990). Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 45-83). New York: Guilford.
19. Looije, D., Bijleveld, C., Weerman, F., & Hendriks, J. (2004). Gedwongen seks als groepsactiviteit: een dossierstudie naar groepszedendelicten [Forced sex as a group activity: A file analysis of group sex offenses] Tijdschrift voor seksuologie, 28, 183-196.
20. Marshall, W.L. (1989). A revised approach to the treatment of men who sexually assault adult females. In G. C. Nagayama Hall, R. Hirschman, J. R. Graham, & M. S. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment and treatment (pp. 197-214). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
21. O'Brien, M., & Bera, W. (1986). Adolescent sex offenders: A descriptive typology. A News Letter of the National Family Life Education Network, 1, 1-5.
22. Pithers, W. (1990). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressors: A method for maintaining therapeutic gain and enhancing external supervision. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault (pp. 343-361). New York: Plenum Press.
23. Raven, J., Raven, J.C., & Court, H.H. (2000). Raven manual: Section 3. Standard progressive matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.
24. Ribbe, D. (1996). Psychometric review of Traumatic Event Screening Instrument for Children (TESI-C). In B. H. Stamm (Ed.), Measurement of stress, trauma and adaptation (pp. 386-387). Lutherville, MD: Sidran Press.
25. Ullman, S.E. (1998). A comparison of gang and individual rape incidents. Violence and Victims, 14, 1-11.
26. van Widenfelt, B.M., Goedhart, A. W., Treffers, P. D., & Goodman, R. (2003). Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 281-289.
27. van Wijk, A. Ph., 't Hart, L.A., Doreleijers, Th. A. H., & Bullens, R.A.R. (2005). Ontwikkeling screeningsinstrument voor jeugdige zedendelinquenten [Development of a screening device]. Amsterdam: VUmc/VU.
28. Vermeiren, R., Jespers, I., & Moffitt, T. (2006). Mental health problems in juvenile justice population. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15, 333-351.
29. Warr, M. (1996). Organization and instigation in delinquent groups. Criminology, 34, 11-37.
30. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.