Assessing the impact of a structured argumentation board on the quality of students' argumentative writing skills

Learning by Effective Utilization of Technologies: Facilitating Intercultural Understanding, Proceeding of the 14th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Brudvik, Ole C ^a   Hong, Khai Seng ^a   Chee, Yam San ^a   Guo, Libo ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Critical thinking; ICT; Qualitative assessment; Structured argumentation board

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; CRITICAL THINKING; ICT; QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; STRUCTURED ARGUMENTATION BOARD;

DESIGN; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING; RESEARCH;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84857465065     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
2. Kuhn, D. (2005). Education For Thinking. Harvard University Press.
3. Osbourne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
4. Cho, K. L. & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. ETR&D, 50 (3), 5-22.
5. Dewey, J. 1991. (original publication 1910). How we Think. Prometheus Books. Buffalo, NY. (Originally published by: D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA)
6. Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
7. Cederblom, J., & Paulsen, D. W. (2001). Critical Reasoning. Understanding and Criticising Arguments and Theories. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
8. Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham Shum, S. J., & Carr, C. S. (2003). Visualising argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. London: Springer Verlag.
9. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. C. Emerson, & M. Holquist (Eds.); V. W. Mc Gee, Trans.; pp 259-422. Austin: University of Texas Press.
10. Gee, J. P. (2001). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the school based literacy. Paper presented at the Science Literacy Connections Conference, Baltimore, MD.
11. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
13. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Ramage J., D., Bean, J., C., and Johnson, J. (2004). Writing arguments: A rhetoric with readings. Pearson Education Inc.
16. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Analysing Verbal Data: Principles, Methods, and Problems. In K Tobin & B Fraser, (Eds). International Handbook of Science Education (Kluwer)