Identification and classification of facial familiarity in directed lying: An ERP study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Sun, Delin ^a   Chan, Chetwyn C H ^b   Lee, Tatia M C ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDENTITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL LEARNING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EVOKED RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DECEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FACE; HUMANS; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84857437422     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031250     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Keller L, Reeve HK, (1998) Familiarity breeds cooperation. Nature 394: 121-122.
2. Dirks J, Gibson E, (1977) Infants Perception of Similarity between Live People and Their Photographs. Child Development 48: 124-130.
3. Fox CJ, Iaria G, Barton JJ, (2008) Disconnection in prosopagnosia and face processing. Cortex 44: 996-1009.
4. Bruce V, Young A, (1986) Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 77 (Pt 3): 305-327.
5. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI, (2000) The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 223-233.
6. Gobbini MI, Haxby JV, (2007) Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia 45: 32-41.
7. Bhatt S, Mbwana J, Adeyemo A, Sawyer A, Hailu A, et al. (2009) Lying about facial recognition: an fMRI study. Brain Cogn 69: 382-390.
8. Lee TMY, Sun DL, Lee TMC, (2011) Neural correlates of neural activity associated with deception across different processing phases. (under review).
9. Eimer M, (2000) Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 10: 145-158.
10. Eimer M, (2000) Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology 111: 694-705.
11. Valentine T, (1988) Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. Br J Psychol 79 (Pt 4): 471-491.
12. Yin RK, (1969) Looking at Upside-down Faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81: 141-145.
13. Boehm SG, Paller KA, (2006) Do I know you? Insights into memory for faces from brain potentials. Clinical EEG & Neuroscience Journal 37: 322-329.
14. Bentin S, Deouell LY, (2000) Structural encoding and identification in face processing: erp evidence for separate mechanisms. Cogn Neuropsychol 17: 35-55.
15. Jemel B, Calabria M, Delvenne JF, Crommelinck M, Bruyer R, (2003) Differential involvement of episodic and face representations in ERP repetition effects. Neuroreport 14: 525-530.
16. Jemel B, George N, Olivares E, Fiori N, Renault B, (1999) Event-related potentials to structural familiar face incongruity processing. Psychophysiology 36: 437-452.
17. Puce A, Allison T, McCarthy G, (1999) Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials. Cerebral Cortex 9: 445-458.
18. Allison T, Puce A, Spencer DD, McCarthy G, (1999) Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cerebral Cortex 9: 415-430.
19. Rossion B, Schiltz C, Robaye L, Pirenne D, Crommelinck M, (2001) How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13: 1019-1034.
20. Leveroni CL, Seidenberg M, Mayer AR, Mead LA, Binder JR, et al. (2000) Neural systems underlying the recognition of familiar and newly learned faces. Journal of Neuroscience 20: 878-886.
21. Proverbio AM, Brignone V, Matarazzo S, Del Zotto M, Zani A, (2006) Gender and parental status affect the visual cortical response to infant facial expression. Neuropsychologia 44: 2987-2999.
22. Hoffmann H, Kessler H, Eppel T, Rukavina S, Traue HC, (2010) Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men. ACTA Psychologica (Amsterdam) 135: 278-283.
23. Farrow TF, Reilly R, Rahman TA, Herford AE, Woodruff PW, et al. (2003) Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie. Perceptual and Motor Skills 97: 451-460.
24. Einav S, Hood BM, (2008) Tell-tale eyes: children's attribution of gaze aversion as a lying cue. Developmental Psychology 44: 1655-1667.
25. Smith TW, (1992) Discrepancies between men and women in reporting number of sexual partners: a summary from four countries. Social Biology 39: 203-211.
26. Oldfield RC, (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113.
27. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E, (1983) A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 55: 468-484.
28. Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ, (2004) Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials (II): a hierarchical temporal model. Neuroimage 22: 503-520.
29. Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ, (2004) Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials: I. Generic considerations. Neuroimage 22: 492-502.
30. Henson RN, Mouchlianitis E, Matthews WJ, Kouider S, (2008) Electrophysiological correlates of masked face priming. Neuroimage 40: 884-895.
31. Boly M, Garrido MI, Gosseries O, Bruno MA, Boveroux P, et al. (2011) Preserved Feedforward But Impaired Top-Down Processes in the Vegetative State. Science 332: 858-862.