All structured reporting systems are not created equal

Radiology

Volumn 262, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 726-

  Johnson, Annette J ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION PROTOCOL; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; CONTENT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LETTER; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURED REPORTING SYSTEM;

DOCUMENTATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84857407871     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11111679     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H. Improving communication of diagnostic radiology fi ndings through structured reporting. Radiology 2011;260(1):174-181.
2. Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B. Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 2009;253(1):74-80.
3. RSNA Informatics Reporting. Radiology Reporting Initiative 2009. Radiological Society of North America Web site. http://www.rsna.org/informatics/ radreports.cfm. Accessed August 3, 2011.