Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation

Radiology

Volumn 253, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 74-80

  Johnson, Annette J ^a   Chen, Michael Y M ^a   Shannon Swan, J ^b   Applegate, Kimberly E ^c,e   Littenberg, Benjamin ^d  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FREE TEXT DICTATION; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; RELIABILITY; RESIDENT; SKILL; SPEECH; STROKE; STRUCTURED REPORTING SYSTEM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EDUCATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RECORD; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD;

COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL RECORDS; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STROKE;

EID: 70350513759     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2531090138     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ACR Practice Guideline for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality-safety/guidelines/dx/ comm-diag-rad.aspx. Accessed December 9, 2008.
2. Johnson AJ. Radiology report quality: a cohort study of point-and-click structured reporting versus conventional dictation. Acad Radiol 2002;9:1056-1061.
3. Sobel JL, Pearson ML, Gross K, et al. Information content and clarity of radiologists' reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 1996;3:709-717.
4. Hobby JL, Tom BD, Todd C, et al. Communication of doubt and certainty in radiological reports. Br J Radiol 2000;73:999-1001.
5. Naik SS, Handbridge A, Wilson SR. Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:591-598.
6. Sierra AE, Bisesi MA, Rosenbaum TL, et al. Readability of the radiologic report. Invest Radiol 1992;27:236-239.
7. Robinson PJ. Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Rontgen image. Br J Radiol 1997;70:1085-1098.
8. Lafortune M, Breton G, Baudouin JL. The radiological report: what is useful for the referring physician? Can Assoc Radiol J 1988;39:140-143.
9. Institute of Medicine. Improving the 21st-century health care system. In: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health care system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 2001; 39-60.
10. Tobler HG, Sethi GK, Grover FL, et al. Variations in processes and structures in cardiac surgery practice. Med Care 1995;33(10 suppl):OS43-OS58.
11. Groom RC, Morton JR. Outcomes analysis in cardiac surgery. Perfusion 1997;12:257-261.
12. Sistrom CL, Langlotz CP. A framework for improving radiology reporting. J Am Coll Radiol 2005;2:159-167.
13. eDictation Web site. http://www.edictation.com. Accessed August 12, 2003.
14. Ohmann C, Thon K, Stöltzing H, et al. The personal computer as an aid to documentation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Theor Surg 1986;1:69-83.
15. Gouveia-Oliveira A, Raposo VD, Salgado NC, Almeida I, Nobre-Leitão, Galvão de Melo F. Longitudinal comparative study on the influence of computers on reporting of clinical data. Endoscopy 1991;23:334-337.
16. Wrenn K, Rodewald L, Lumb E, Slovis C. The use of structured, complaint-specific patient encounter forms in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:805-812.
17. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998.
18. Kuhn K, Gaus W, Wechsler JG, et al. Structured reporting of medical findings: evaluation of a system in gastroenterology. Methods Inf Med 1992;31:268-274.
19. Bell DS, Greenes RA. Evaluation of UltraSTAR: performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994; 216-222.
20. Langlotz CP. RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radio-Graphics 2006;26:1595-1597.
21. RSNA-NIBIB RadLex Ontology Project. https://www.fbo.gov/spg/HHS/NIH/ NHLBI/NHLBI-PB-BB-2008-158-RCO/listing.html. Accessed December 9, 2008.
22. Weiss DL, Langlotz CP. Structured reporting: patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? Radiology 2008;249:739-747.
23. Reiner BI, Knight N, Siegel EL. Radiology reporting: past, present, and future - the radiologist's perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4:313-319.
24. Finlay K, Norman GR, Keane DR, et al. A web-based test of residents' skills in diagnostic radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J 2006;57:106-116.
25. Newble DI, Baxter A, Elmslie RG. A comparison of multiple-choice tests and free-response tests in examinations of clinical competence. Med Educ 1979;13:263-268.
26. Ganguli S, Pedrosa I, Yam CS, Appignani B, Siewert B, Kressel HY. Part I: preparing first-year radiology residents for assessing their readiness for on-call responsibilities. Acad Radiol 2006;13:764-769.
27. Margolis SA, Nilsson KA, Reed RL. Performance in reading radiographs: does level of education predict skill? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003;23:48-53.