Lesions to primary sensory and posterior parietal cortices impair recovery from hand paresis after stroke

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Abela, Eugenio ^a,c   Missimer, John ^b   Wiest, Roland ^c   Federspiel, Andrea ^c   Hess, Christian ^c   Sturzenegger, Matthias ^c   Weder, Bruno ^a,c  

^a CANTONAL HOSPITAL ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

^b PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COST FUNCTION MASKING; CYTOARCHITECTURE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INSULA; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; MASKING; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROANATOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARIETAL CORTEX; PATIENT CODING; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; POSTCENTRAL GYRUS; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SECONDARY AUDITORY CORTEX; STATISTICAL MODEL; STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONVALESCENCE; DEMOGRAPHY; HAND; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; PARESIS; PARIETAL LOBE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN MAPPING; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PARESIS; PARIETAL LOBE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STROKE; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84857407287     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031275     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Betzler F, Alsop D, et al. (2010) Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Neurology 74: 280-287.
2. Zhu LL, Lindenberg R, Alexander MP, Schlaug G, (2010) Lesion load of the corticospinal tract predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Stroke 41: 910-915.
3. Amunts K, Zilles K, (2001) Advances in cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human cerebral cortex. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 11: 151-169, vii.
4. Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, et al. (2005) A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 25: 1325-1335.
5. Papageorgiou E, Ticini LF, Hardiess G, Schaeffel F, Wiethoelter H, et al. (2008) The pupillary light reflex pathway: cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps in hemianopic patients. Neurology 70: 956-963.
6. Homke L, Amunts K, Bonig L, Fretz C, Binkofski F, et al. (2009) Analysis of lesions in patients with unilateral tactile agnosia using cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 1444-1456.
7. Karnath HO, Rennig J, Johannsen L, Rorden C, (2010) The anatomy underlying acute versus chronic spatial neglect: a longitudinal study. Brain 134: 903-912.
8. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ, (2003) Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 34: 2181-2186.
9. Krakauer JW, (2005) Arm function after stroke: from physiology to recovery. Semin Neurol 25: 384-395.
10. Lyden P, Lu M, Jackson C, Marler J, Kothari R, et al. (1999) Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators. Stroke 30: 2347-2354.
11. Lyden PD, Hantson L, (1998) Assessment scales for the evaluation of stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 7: 113-127.
12. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, et al. (1985) Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66: 69-74.
13. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA, (1969) An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 50: 311-319.
14. Stern EB, (1992) Stability of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test across three test sessions. Am J Occup Ther 46: 647-649.
15. Dyck PJ, O'Brien PC, Kosanke JL, Gillen DA, Karnes JL, (1993) A 4, 2, and 1 stepping algorithm for quick and accurate estimation of cutaneous sensation threshold. Neurology 43: 1508-1512.
16. Bohlhalter S, Fretz C, Weder B, (2002) Hierarchical versus parallel processing in tactile object recognition: a behavioural-neuroanatomical study of aperceptive tactile agnosia. Brain 125: 2537-2548.
17. Matthews JN, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P, (1990) Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ 300: 230-235.
18. Senn S, (1990) Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ 300: 680.
19. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer RL, et al. (1987) Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50: 714-719.
20. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM, (1983) The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46: 521-524.
21. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J, (1992) Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 23: 1084-1089.
22. Akaike H, (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Aut Control 19: 7.
23. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL, (1995) Model selection for extended quasi-likelihood models in small samples. Biometrics 51: 1077-1084.
24. Eickhoff SB, Heim S, Zilles K, Amunts K, (2006) Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps. Neuroimage 32: 570-582.
25. Eickhoff SB, Paus T, Caspers S, Grosbras MH, Evans AC, et al. (2007) Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited. Neuroimage 36: 511-521.
26. Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley L, Hewer RL, (1989) Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52: 1267-1272.
27. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, Thijs V, Dobbelaere J, et al. (2008) Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22: 173-179.
28. Seitz RJ, Roland PE, (1992) Learning of Sequential Finger Movements in Man: A Combined Kinematic and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Study. Eur J Neurosci 4: 154-165.
29. Binkofski F, Kunesch E, Classen J, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ, (2001) Tactile apraxia: unimodal apractic disorder of tactile object exploration associated with parietal lobe lesions. Brain 124: 132-144.
30. Makris N, Kennedy DN, McInerney S, Sorensen AG, Wang R, et al. (2005) Segmentation of subcomponents within the superior longitudinal fascicle in humans: a quantitative, in vivo, DT-MRI study. Cereb Cortex 15: 854-869.
31. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, (1996) Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 16: 785-807.
32. Luft AR, Buitrago MM, Kaelin-Lang A, Dichgans J, Schulz JB, (2004) Protein synthesis inhibition blocks consolidation of an acrobatic motor skill. Learn Mem 11: 379-382.
33. Ward NS, (2004) Functional reorganization of the cerebral motor system after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 17: 725-730.
34. Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Frost SB, (2001) Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve 24: 1000-1019.
35. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW, (1996) Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272: 1791-1794.
36. Ward NS, Newton JM, Swayne OB, Lee L, Thompson AJ, et al. (2006) Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain 129: 809-819.
37. Pavlides C, Miyashita E, Asanuma H, (1993) Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 70: 733-741.
38. Vidoni ED, Acerra NE, Dao E, Meehan SK, Boyd LA, (2010) Role of the primary somatosensory cortex in motor learning: An rTMS study. Neurobiol Learn Mem 93: 532-539.
39. Vidoni ED, Boyd LA, (2009) Preserved motor learning after stroke is related to the degree of proprioceptive deficit. Behav Brain Funct 5: 36.
40. Iwamura Y, (1998) Hierarchical somatosensory processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8: 522-528.
41. Culham JC, Valyear KF, (2006) Human parietal cortex in action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16: 205-212.
42. Jones EG, Coulter JD, Hendry SH, (1978) Intracortical connectivity of architectonic fields in the somatic sensory, motor and parietal cortex of monkeys. J Comp Neurol 181: 291-347.
43. Hyvarinen J, Poranen A, (1978) Receptive field integration and submodality convergence in the hand area of the post-central gyrus of the alert monkey. J Physiol 283: 539-556.
44. Hsiao S, (2008) Central mechanisms of tactile shape perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18: 418-424.
45. Hikosaka O, Tanaka M, Sakamoto M, Iwamura Y, (1985) Deficits in manipulative behaviors induced by local injections of muscimol in the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey. Brain Res 325: 375-380.
46. Bodegard A, Geyer S, Grefkes C, Zilles K, Roland PE, (2001) Hierarchical processing of tactile shape in the human brain. Neuron 31: 317-328.
47. Grefkes C, Weiss PH, Zilles K, Fink GR, (2002) Crossmodal processing of object features in human anterior intraparietal cortex: an fMRI study implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 35: 173-184.
48. Hartmann S, Missimer JH, Stoeckel C, Abela E, Shah J, et al. (2008) Functional connectivity in tactile object discrimination: a principal component analysis of an event related fMRI-Study. PLoS One 3: e3831.
49. Stoeckel MC, Weder B, Binkofski F, Buccino G, Shah NJ, et al. (2003) A fronto-parietal circuit for tactile object discrimination: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 19: 1103-1114.
50. Binkofski F, Buccino G, Posse S, Seitz RJ, Rizzolatti G, et al. (1999) A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI-study. Eur J Neurosci 11: 3276-3286.
51. Binkofski F, Seitz RJ, Hacklander T, Pawelec D, Mau J, et al. (2001) Recovery of motor functions following hemiparetic stroke: a clinical and magnetic resonance-morphometric study. Cerebrovasc Dis 11: 273-281.
52. Nowak DA, (2008) The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32: 1439-1450.
53. Platz T, Prass K, Denzler P, Bock S, Mauritz KH, (1999) Testing a motor performance series and a kinematic motion analysis as measures of performance in high-functioning stroke patients: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to therapeutic intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80: 270-277.
54. Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, Tickle-Degnen L, (2000) A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81: 95-101.