Conservative therapy in microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix is justified: An analysis of 59 cases and a review of the literature

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1640-1645

  Baalbergen, Astrid ^a   Smedts, Frank ^a   Helmerhorst, Theo J M ^b  

^a REINIER DE GRAAF HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Microinvasive adenocarcinoma; Therapy; Uterine cervix

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CERVICECTOMY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRACHELECTOMY WITH LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; CANCER INVASION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REPRODUCTIVE PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; CONIZATION; FEMALE; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84857393637     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: 15251438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182262059     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Bulk S, Visser O, Rozendaal L, et al. Cervical cancer in the Netherlands 1989-1998: decrease of squamous cell carcinoma in older women, increase of adenocarcinoma in younger women. Int J Cancer. 2005;113:1005-1009. (Pubitemid 40096882)
2. Beets GCN (NIDI) VAR, Sanderse C (RIVM). Wat waren de belangrijkste ontwikkelingen in het verleden? In: RIVM, ed. Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning. Bilthoven, Netherlands: Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid, 2009.
3. Hopkins MP, Morley GW. A comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:912-917.
4. Nakanishi T, Ishikawa H, Suzuki Y, et al. A comparison of prognoses of pathologic stage IB adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:289-293.
5. Creasman WT, Parker RT. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1973;16:261-275.
6. FIGO. Modifications in the staging for stage I vulvar and stage I cervical cancer. Report of the FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;50:215-216.
7. Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;105: 107-108.
8. Lee SW, Kim YM, Son WS, et al. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:209-215.
9. Ostor AG. Pandora's box or Ariadne's thread? Definition and prognostic significance of microinvasion in the uterine cervix. Squamous lesions. Pathol Annu. 1995;30:103-136.
10. Buckley SL, Tritz DM, Van Le L, et al. Lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63:4-9. (Pubitemid 26337957)
11. Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, et al. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;70:209-262.
12. Gadducci A, Sartori E, Maggino T, et al. The clinical outcome of patients with stage IA1 and IA2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24:513-516. (Pubitemid 37462571)
13. Kaku T, Kamura T, Sakai K, et al. Early adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;65:281-285. (Pubitemid 27216941)
14. Ostor AG. Early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000;19:29-38. (Pubitemid 30010640)
15. Smith HO, Qualls CR, Romero AA, et al. Is there a difference in survival for IA1 and IA2 adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix? Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85:229-241. (Pubitemid 34522979)
16. Ceballos KM, Shaw D, Daya D. Microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma (FIGO stage 1A tumors): results of surgical staging and outcome analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30: 370-374. (Pubitemid 43740170)
17. Bisseling KC, Bekkers RL, Rome RM, et al. Treatment of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a retrospective study and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:424-430. (Pubitemid 350160852)
18. Yahata T, Nishino K, Kashima K, et al. Conservative treatment of stage IA1 adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix with a longterm follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:1063-1066.
19. Elliott P, Coppleson M, Russell P, et al. Early invasive (FIGO stage IA) carcinoma of the cervix: a clinico-pathologic study of 476 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000;10:42-52. (Pubitemid 30219477)
20. Webb JC, Key CR, Qualls CR, et al. Population-based study of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:701-706.
21. Waggoner SE. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2003;361:2217-2225. (Pubitemid 36782559)
22. Balega J, Michael H, Hurteau J, et al. The risk of nodal metastasis in early adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14:104-109. (Pubitemid 38280631)
23. Rogers LJ, Luesley DM. Stage IA2 cervical carcinoma: how much treatment is enough? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19: 1620-1624.
24. Reynolds EA, Tierney K,Keeney GL, et al. Analysis of outcomes of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix by treatment type. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1150-1157.
25. Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, et al. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2000;88:1877-1882. (Pubitemid 30212998)