The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 209-215

  Lee, Shin Wha ^a   Kim, Yong Man ^a   Son, Woo Seok ^b   You, Hang Jo ^c   Kim, Dae Yeon ^a   Kim, Jong Hyeok ^a   Kim, Young Tak ^a   Nam, Joo Hyun ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Kangneung Asan Hospital   (South Korea)

^c University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conization; Microinvasive cervical cancer; Stage IA1

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; ADULT; AGED; CANCER INVASION; FEMALE; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; CONIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 59649097678     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340802596009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Mestwerdt G. Die Frühdiagnose des Kollumkarzinoms. Z Geburtshilfe Gynakol. 1947;69:198-202.
2. Creasman W. New gynecologic cancer staging. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;58:157-8.
3. Bisseling KC, Bekkers RL, Rome RM, Quinn MA. Treatment of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a retrospective study and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107(3):424-30.
4. Östör A. Early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000;19:29-38.
5. Reich O, Lahousen M, Pickel H, Tamussino K, Winter R. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:193-6.
6. Bar-Am A, Daniel Y, Ron IG, Niv J, Kupferminc MJ, Bornstein J, et al. Combined colposcopy, loop conization, and laser vaporization reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervical dysplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78:47-51.
7. Andersen ES, Nielsen K, Pedersen B. Combination laser conization as treatment of microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998;19:352-5.
8. Tseng CJ, Horng SG, Soong YK, Hsueh S, Hsieh CH, Lin HW. Conservative conization for microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:1009-10.
9. Roman LD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Agahjanian A, Qian D, Morrow CP. Risk of residual invasive disease in women with microinvasive squamous cancer in a conization specimen. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:759-64.
10. Gurgel MS, Bedone AJ, Andrade LA, Panetta K. Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix: histological findings on cone specimens related to residual neoplasia on hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;65:437-40.
11. Chang DY, Cheng WF, Torng PL, Chen RJ, Huang SC. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63:53-6.
12. Mota F. Microinvasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix: treatment modalities. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:505-9.
13. Creasman WT, Fetter BF, Clarke-Pearson DL, Kaufmann L, Parker RT. Management of stage IA carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;153:164-70.
14. Delgado G, Bundy BN, Fowler WC, Stehman FB, Sevin B, Creasman WT, et al. A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;35:314-20.
15. Greer BE, Figge DC, Tamimi HK, Cain JM, Lee RB. Stage IA2 squamous carcinoma of the cervix: difficult diagnosis and therapeutic dilemma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:1406-9.
16. Kolstadt P. Follow-up study of 232 patients with stage IA1 and 411 patients with stage IA2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (microinvasive carcinoma). Gynecol Oncol. 1989;33:265-72.
17. Burghardt E, Girardi F, Lahousen M, Pickel H, Tamussino K. Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cancer 1991;67:1037-45.
18. Sevin B, Nadji M, Averette HE, Hilsenbeck S, Smith D, Lampe B. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. 1992;72:2121-8.
19. Lecuru F, Neji K, Robin F, De Bievre P, Vilde F, Taurelle R. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Rationale for conservative treatment in early squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1997;18:465-70.
20. Benedet JL, Anderson GH. Stage IA carcinoma of the cervix revisited. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:1052-9.
21. Shepherd JH, Milliken DA. Conservative surgery for carcinoma of the cervix. Clin Oncol. 2008;20(6):395-400.
22. Burghardt E, Ostor A, Fox H. The new FIGO definition of cervical cancer stage IA: a critique. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;65:1-5.
23. Ostor AG. Pandora's box or Ariadne's thread? Definition and prognostic significance of microinvasion in the uterine cervix: squamous lesions. In: Pathology Annual, Part II, vol. 30. Melbourne: Department of Pathology, 1995. pp. 103-36.
24. Tseng CJ, Liang CC, Lin CT, Huang KG, Chou HH, Chang TC, et al. A study of diagnostic failure of loop conization in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73:91-5.
25. Duggan BD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Gebhardt JA, Groshen S, Morrow CP, et al. Cold-knife conization versus conization by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:276-82.
26. Giacalone PL, Laffargue F, Aligier N, Roger P, Combecal J, Daures JP. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;75:356-60.
27. Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Duggan BD, Roman LD. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:996-1000.
28. Sedlis A, Sall S, Tsukada Y, Park R, Mangan C, Shingleton H, et al. Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinical-pathological study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;133:64-74.
29. Paterson-Brown S, Chappatte OA, Clark SK, Wright A, Maxwell P, Taub NA, et al. The significance of cone biopsy resection margins. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;42:182-5.
30. Bekkers RL, Keyser KG, Bulten J, Hanselaar AG, Schijf CP, Boonstra H, et al. The value of loop electrosurgical conization in the treatment of stage IA1 microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12:485-9.