The effectiveness of land based exercise compared to decompressive surgery in the management of lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: A systematic review

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Jarrett, Mark S ^a,b   Orlando, Joseph F ^a,c   Grimmer Somers, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b Eastwood Physiotherapy   (Australia)

^c ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; EXERCISE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; SPINE DISEASE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPARATIVE STUDY; FITNESS; KINESIOTHERAPY; LOW BACK PAIN; METHODOLOGY; NEUROSURGERY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPONDYLOSIS; STANDARD; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; EXERCISE THERAPY; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PHYSICAL FITNESS; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPONDYLOSIS;

EID: 84857382480     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-30     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham study. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ, Spine J 2009 9 545 550 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005 19398386
2. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Chad D, Neurol Clin 2007 25 407 418 10.1016/j.ncl.2007.01.003 17445736 (Pubitemid 46575161)
3. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Lorig K, Sobel D, Stewart A, Brown BW, Andura A, Itter P, Gonzalez G, Laurent D, Holmanm A, Med Care 1999 37 5 14 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00003 10413387
4. Health reform through coordinated care: SA HealthPlus. Battersby MW, BMJ 2005 330 662 665 10.1136/bmj.330.7492.662 15775001 (Pubitemid 40444770)
5. Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. Melzac R, Journal of Dental Education 1999 65 1378 1382
6. A pain neuromatrix approach to patients with chronic pain. Moseley GL, Manual Therapy 2003 8 130 140 10.1016/S1356-689X(03)00051-1 12909433 (Pubitemid 37010282)
7. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR Imaging. Sirvanci M, Bhatia M, Ganiyusufoglu KA, Duran C, Tezer M, Ozturk C, Aydogan M, Hamzaoglu A, Eur Spine J 2008 17 679 685 10.1007/s00586-008-0646-5 18324426
8. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of physiotherapy used to reduce chronic low back pain disability: a pragmatic randomized trial with economic evaluation. Critchley DJ, Ratcliffe J, Noonan S, Jones RH, Hurley MV, Spine 2007 32 1474 1481 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318067dc26 17572614 (Pubitemid 46956140)
9. A randomized clinical trial comparing two physiotherapy interventions for chronic low back pain. Lewis JS, Hewitt JS, Billington L, Cole S, Byng J, Karayiannis S, Spine 2005 30 711 721 10.1097/01.brs.0000157469.27779.de 15803071
10. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? a randomized controlled trial. Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P, Niinimaki T, Ronty H, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Harkanen T, Hurri H, Finnish Lumbar Spinal Research Group, Spine 2007 32 1 8 10.1097/01.brs. 0000251014.81875.6d 17202885 (Pubitemid 46058577)
11. Manual therapy interventions for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Reiman MP, Harris JY, Cleland JA, NZ J Physiother 2009 37 17 36
12. Therapeutic exercise and manual therapy for persons with lumbar spinal stenosis. Iversen MD, Choudhary VR, Patel SC, Intl J Clin Rheumatol 2010 5 425 437 10.2217/ijr.10.29
13. North American Spine Society: evidence-based clinical guidelines for multidisciplinary spine care: diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Watters WC, Baisden J, Gilbert T, Kreiner DS, Resnick D, Bono C, Ghiselli G, Heggeness M, Mazanec D, O'Neill C, Reitman C, Shaffer WO, Summers J, Toton J, http://www.spine.org/Documents/NASSCG-Stenosis.pdf
14. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR, Glassman SD, Johnson JR, J Bone Joint Surg 2003 85A 2089 2092 (Pubitemid 37385904)
15. Surgical management of spinal stenosis. Zak PJ, Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2003 14 143 155 10.1016/S1047-9651(02)00079-7 12622488 (Pubitemid 36255415)
16. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D, PLoS Med 2009 6 1000100 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 19621070
17. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Jüni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, Bartlett C, Egger M, Int J Epidem 2002 31 115 123 10.1093/ije/31.1.115 (Pubitemid 34284912)
18. Appraising the quality of systematic reviews. Schlosser RW, Focus: Technical Briefs 2007 17 1 8
19. Critical review form-quantitative studies. Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M, http://www.srs-mcmaster.ca/Portals/20/pdf/ebp/ quanreview.pdf
20. Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence'. Merlin T, Weston A, Tooher R, BMC Med Res Methodol 2009 9 34 10.1186/1471-2288-9-34 19519887
21. The use of percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index Score as an outcome measure in lumbar surgery. Little DG, MacDonald D, Spine 1994 19 2139 2143 10.1097/00007632-199410000-00001 7809744 (Pubitemid 24308084)
22. Rubin A, Statistics for evidence-based practice and evaluation Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole 2007
23. Is spinal stenosis better treated surgically or nonsurgically? Athiviraham A, Yen D, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007 458 90 93 17308483 (Pubitemid 46701361)
24. Treadmill walking with body weight support is no more effective than cycling when added to an exercise program for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. Pua YH, Cai CC, Lim KC, Aust J Physiother 2007 53 83 89 10.1016/S0004-9514(07)70040-5 17535143
25. A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Childs JD, Wainner RS, Gill HE, Ryder MG, Garber MB, Bennett AC, Fritz JM, Spine 2007 31 2541 2549
26. Efficacy of exercise and ultrasound in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Goren A, Yildiz N, Topuz O, Findikoglu G, Ardic F, Clin Rehabil 2010 24 623 31 10.1177/0269215510367539 20530650
27. Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis. Koc Z, Ozcakir S, Sivrioglu K, Gurbet A, Kucukoglu S, Spine 2009 34 985 989 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c0a6b 19404172
28. The efficacy of physical therapy and physical therapy plus calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Kotevoglu N, Kuran B, Yonsei Med J 2009 50 683 688 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.683 19881973
29. Efficacy of unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Cavusoglu H, Turkmenoglu O, Kaya RA, Tuncer C, Colak I, Sahin Y, Aydin Y, Turk Neurosurg 2007 17 100 108 17935024
30. MiDAS I (mild decompression alternative to open surgery): a preliminary report of a prospective, multi-center clinical study. Chopko B, Caraway DL, Pain Physician 2007 13 369 378
31. Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer. Sobottke R, Rollinghoff M, Siewe J, Schlegel U, Yagdiran A, Spangenberg M, Lesch R, Eysel P, Koy T, Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010 53 179 183 10.1055/s-0030-1263108 21132610
32. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. Thome C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bazner H, Pockler-Schoniger C, Wohrle J, Schmiedek P, J Neurosurg Spine 2005 3 129 141 10.3171/spi.2005.3.2. 0129 16370302
33. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson ANA, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H, for the SPORT Investigator, N Engl J Med 2008 358 794 810 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136 18287602 (Pubitemid 351281641)
34. Functional and clinical evaluation for the surgical treatment of degenerative stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal. Yasar B, Simsek S, Er U, Yigitakanli K, Eksioglu E, Altug T, Belen D, Kars ZH, Bavbek M, J Neurosurg Spine 2009 11 347 352 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08692 19769518
35. Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis. Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L, Kroger H, Andrade J, Jimenez R, Tapaninaho A, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O, Spine 2006 31 648 E663 10.1097/01.brs.0000231727.88477.da 16915081