Does a standard measure of self-reported physical disability correlate with clinician perception of impairment related to cancer screening?

Cancer

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1345-1352

  Buckley, David I ^a,b   Davis, Melinda M ^a,b   Andresen, Elena M ^c  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

disabled persons; early detection of cancer; health services research; healthcare disparities; primary health care; rural health

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; DISABLED PERSONS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SELF REPORT; WEIGHTS AND MEASURES;

EID: 84857368701     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26393     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Armour BS, Thierry JM, Wolf LA,. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008. Womens Health Issues. 2009; 19: 406-414.
2. Ramirez A, Farmer GC, Grant D, Papachristou T,. Disability and preventive cancer screening: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 2057-2064. (Pubitemid 41572385)
3. Smeltzer SC,. Preventive health screening for breast and cervical cancer and osteoporosis in women with physical disabilities. Fam Commun Health. 2006; 29 (1 suppl): 35S-43S. (Pubitemid 44510329)
4. Nosek MA, Howland CA,. Breast and cervical cancer screening among women with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78 (12 suppl 5): S39-S44. (Pubitemid 28007691)
5. Schootman M, Jeffe DB,. Identifying factors associated with disability-related differences in breast cancer screening (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2003; 14: 97-107. (Pubitemid 36539516)
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of cervical and breast cancer screening among women with and without functional limitations-United States, 1994-1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998; 47: 853-856.
7. Diab ME, Johnston MV,. Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 749-757. (Pubitemid 38857911)
8. Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Harris-David L, O'Day B,. Use of screening and preventive services among women with disabilities. Am J Med Qual. 2001; 16: 135-144. (Pubitemid 33616261)
9. Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Siebens H,. Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 955-961. (Pubitemid 30366982)
10. Jones G, Beatty P,. Disparities in preventive service use among working age adults with mobility limitations. Res Soc Sci Disabil. 2003; 3: 109-130. (Pubitemid 137640451)
11. Chan L, Doctor J, MacLehose RF, et al. Do Medicare patients with disabilities receive preventive services? A population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 642-646. (Pubitemid 29269645)
12. Cheng E, Myers L, Wolf S, et al. Mobility impairments and use of preventive services in women with multiple sclerosis: observational study. BMJ. 2001; 323: 968-969. (Pubitemid 33016045)
13. Havercamp SM, Scandlin D, Roth M,. Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina. Public Health Rep. 2004; 119: 418-426. (Pubitemid 40353148)
14. Wei W, Findley PA, Sambamoorthi U,. Disability and receipt of clinical preventive services among women. Womens Health Issues. 2006; 16: 286-296. (Pubitemid 44937640)
15. Drum C, Krahn G, Culley C, Hammond L,. Recognizing and responding to the health disparities of people with disabilities. Californian J Health Promot. 2005; 3: 29-42.
16. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Improve the Health and Wellness of Persons With Disabilities. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2005.
17. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerrland: World Health Organization; 2001.
18. Altman BM,. Disability definitions, models, classification schemes, and applications. In:, Albrecht GL, Seelman KD, Bury M, eds. Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001: 97-122.
19. McDowell I, Newell C,. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
20. Mitra S,. The capability approach and disability. J Disabil Policy Studies. 2006; 16: 236-247. (Pubitemid 44599530)
21. Reis J, Breslin M, Iezzoni LI, Kirschner K,. It Takes More Than Ramps to Solve the Crisis of Healthcare for People with Disabilities. Chicago, IL: Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago; 2004.
22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. Atlanta, GA; US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002.
23. Coughlin SS, King J,. Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006 [serial online]. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10: 146.
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: breast cancer screening among women aged 50-74 years-United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010; 59: 813-816.
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years-United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010; 59: 808-812.
26. Streiner DL, Norman GR,. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Use. 3rd ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2003.
27. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV,. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of 2 paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990; 43: 543-549. (Pubitemid 20178543)
28. Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR,. High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990; 43: 551-558. (Pubitemid 20178544)
29. Szklo M, Nieto FJ,. Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2007.