Automatic identification of personal insults on social news sites

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 270-285

  Sood, Sara Owsley ^a   Churchill, Elizabeth F ^b   Antin, Judd ^b  

^a POMONA COLLEGE   (United States)

^b YAHOO RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS SYSTEM; AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; AUTOMATIC DETECTION; AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION; COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT; MACHINE-LEARNING; MECHANICAL TURKS; MULTI-STEP; ONLINE COMMUNITIES; SEMI-AUTOMATED; TRAINING CORPUS; USER-GENERATED CONTENT;

MANAGEMENT; MANAGERS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 84857361560     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21690     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aue, A., & Gamon, M. (2005). Customizing sentiment classifiers to new domains: A case study. In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing - RANLP. Presented at the Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing - RANLP. Retrieved from: http://academic.research.microsoft.com/ Publication/4112636/customizing-sentimentclassifiers-to-new-domains-a-case- study.
2. Bradley M.M., & Lang P.J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings. (Technical No. C-1). Gainesville, FL: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida. Retrieved from: http://csea.phhp.ufl.edu/media.html.
3. Budzik, J., Hammond, K.J., & Birnbaum, L. (2001). Information access in context. Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(1-2), 37-53.
4. Callison-Burch, C. (2009). Fast, cheap, and creative: Evaluating translation quality using Amazon's Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
5. Chesney, T., Coyne, I., Logan, B., & Madden, N. (2009). Griefing in virtual worlds: Causes, casualties and coping strategies. Information Systems Journal, 19(6), 525-548.
6. Dinakar, K., Reichart, R.,&Lieberman, H. (2011). Modeling the detection of textual cyberbullying. In Proceedings of International AAAI Conference onWeblogs and Social Media,Workshop "Social MobileWeb." Presented at the International AAAI Conference onWeblogs and Social Media.
7. Ekman, P. (2004). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life, 1st ed. New York: Holt Paperbacks.
8. Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos, C. (1999). On power-law relationships of the Internet topology. In Proceedings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, SIGCOMM '99 (pp. 251-262). Cambridge, MA:ACM.
9. Gamon, M., & Aue, A. (2005). Automatic identification of sentiment vocabulary: exploiting low association with known sentiment terms. In Proceedings of the ACL 2005 Workshop on Feature Engineering for Machine Learning in NLP. (pp. 57-64). Retrieved from:http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ summary?doi=10.1.1.134.7821
10. Gazan, R. (2009). When online communities become self-aware (pp. 1-10). Presented at the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2009.509.
11. Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In C. Nédellec, & C. Rouveirol (Eds.), Machine learning: ECML-98 (Vol. 1398, pp. 137-142). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Retrieved from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/drhq581108850171/.
12. Kittur, A., Chi, E.H., & Suh, B. (2008). Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08 (p. 453). Florence, Italy. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357127.
13. Laboreiro, G., Sarmento, L., Teixeira, J., & Oliveira, E. (2010). Tokenizing micro-blogging messages using a text classification approach. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data, AND '10 (pp. 81-88). Toronto, ON, Canada: ACM. doi:10.1145/1871840.1871853.
14. Lampe, C., & Johnston, E. (2005). Follow the (slash) dot. In Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work - GROUP '05 (p. 11). Presented at the the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference, Sanibel Island, FL. doi:10.1145/ 1099203.1099206.
15. Lampe, C.,&Resnick, P. (2004). Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '04 (pp. 543-550). NewYork: ACM. doi:10.1145/985692.985761.
16. Levenshtein, V.I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8), 707-710.
17. Lou, J.K., Chen, K.T., & Lei, C.L. (2009). A collusion-resistant automation scheme for social moderation systems (p. 571-575). IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2009.
18. Mason, W., & Watts, D.J. (2009). Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds." Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation,HCOMP'09 (pp. 77-85). Paris:ACM. doi:10.1145/1600150.1600175.
19. Morik, K., Brockhausen, P., & Joachims, T. (1999). Combining statistical learning with a knowledge-based approach - A case study in intensive care monitoring. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '99 (pp. 268-277). NewYork: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=645528.657612.
20. Owsley, S., Sood, S., & Hammond, K.J. (2006). Domain specific affective classification of documents. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Analysis ofWeblogs (p. 181-183).
21. Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2005). Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '05 (pp. 115-124). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1219840.1219855.
22. Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2), 1-135.
23. Pang, B., Lee, L.,&Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up?: Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of theACL-02 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Vol. 10, EMNLP '02 (pp. 79-86). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1118693.1118704.
24. Reuters-21578 text categorization test collection. (n.d.).
25. Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 24, 513-523.
26. Sheng,V.S., Provost, F., & Ipeirotis, P.G. (2008). Get another label? improving data quality and data mining using multiple, noisy labelers. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '08 (p. 614). Las Vegas, NV. doi:10.1145/1401890. 1401965.
27. Siersdorfer, S., Chelaru, S., Nejdl, W., & San Pedro, J. (2010). How useful are your comments?: Analyzing and predicting Youtube comments and comment ratings. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on WorldWideWeb (pp. 891-900).
28. Sood, S.O., & Churchill, E.F. (2010). Anger management: Using sentiment analysis to manage online communities. Grace Hopper Celebration.
29. Sood, S., & Vasserman, L. (2009). Esse: Exploring mood on the web. In Proceedings of the 3rd International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).
30. Sood, S., Owsley, S., Hammond, K.J., & Birnbaum, L. (2007). Reasoning through search: A novel approach to sentiment classification (Technical No. NWU-EECS-07-05). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from: http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Publication/5467792/reasoning -through-search-a-novel-approach-tosentiment-classification.
31. Sukumaran, A., Vezich, S., McHugh, M., & Nass, C. (2011). Normative influences on thoughtful online participation. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '11 (pp. 3401-3410). NewYork: ACM. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979450.
32. SVM-light documentation. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://svmlight. joachims.org/.
33. Tetreault, J.R., Filatova, E., & Chodorow, M. (2010). Rethinking grammatical error annotation and evaluation with the Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 FifthWorkshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (pp. 45-48). Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu /viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.170.7443.
34. Turney, P.D. (2002). Thumbs up or thumbs down?: Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '02 (pp. 417-424). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1073083.1073153.
35. Wolpert, D.H. (1992). Stacked generalization. Neural Networks, 5(2), 241-259.
36. Yin, D., Xue, Z., Hong, L., Davison, B., Kontostathis, A., & Edwards, L. (2009). Detection of harassment on web 2.0. In Proceedings of the Content Analysis in the WEB 2.0 (CAW2.0) Workshop at WWW2009. Madrid, Spain.
37. Zhang, D., & Lee, W.S. (2003). Question classification using support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM Sigir Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval (pp. 26-32).