Rhetorical Reckoning: A Response to Bandura

Journal of Management

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 465-474

  Vancouver, Jeffrey B ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

control theory; formal and informal theorizing; self efficacy; social cognitive theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857348809     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206311435951     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Adner R.,Polos L.,Ryall M.,Sorenson O.The case for formal theory.Academy of Management Review. 2009;34:201-208.
2. Bandura A.The concept of agency in social-cognitive theory.American Psychologist. 1989;44:1175-1184.
3. Bandura A.Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997:.
4. Bandura A.On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited.Journal of Management. 2012;38:9-44.
5. Bandura A.,Locke E.Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88:87-99.
6. Busemeyer J.R.,Diederich A.Cognitive modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:.
7. Haggbloom J.S.,Warnick R.,Warnick J.E.,Jones V.K.,Yarbrough G.L.,Russell T.M.,Borecky C.M.,McGahhey R.,Powell J.L.,Beavers J.,Monte E.The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century.Review of General Psychology. 2002;6:139-152.
8. Powers W.T.Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine; 1973:.
9. Powers W.T.Quantitative analysis of purposive systems: Some spadework at the foundations of scientific psychology.Psychological Review. 1978;85:417-435.
10. Powers W.T.Comment on Bandura's "human agency.".American Psychologist. 1991;46:151-153.
11. Salomon G.Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1984;76:647-658.
12. Scherbaum C.A.,Vancouver J.B.If we produce discrepancies, then how? Testing a computational process model of positive goal revision.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2010;40:2201-2231.
13. Stajkovic A.D.,Luthans F.Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 1998;124:240-261.
14. Vancouver J.B.The depth of history and explanation as benefit and bane for psychological control theories.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005;90:38-52.
15. Vancouver J.B.Integrating self-regulation theories of work motivation into a dynamic process theory.Human Resource Management Review. 2008;18:1-18.
16. Vancouver J.B.,Kendall L.N.When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006;91:1146-1153.
17. Vancouver J.B.,More K.M.,Yoder R.J.Self-efficacy and resource allocation: Support for a discontinuous model.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008;93:35-47.
18. Vancouver J.B.,Putka D.J.,Scherbaum C.A.Testing a computational model of the goal-level effect: An example of a neglected methodology.Organizational Research Methods. 2005;8:100-127.
19. Vancouver J.B.,Scherbaum C.A.Do we self-regulate actions or perceptions? A test of two computational models.Computational and Mathematical Organizational Theory. 2008;14:1-22.
20. Vancouver J.B.,Tamanini K.B.,Yoder R.J.Using dynamic computational models to reconnect theory and research: Socialization by the proactive newcomer example.Journal of Management. 2010;36:764-793.
21. Vancouver J.B.,Thompson C.M.,Williams A.A.The changing signs in the relationships between self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86:605-620.
22. Vancouver J.B.,Weinhardt J.M.,Schmidt A.M.A formal, computational theory of multiple-goal pursuit: Integrating goal-choice and goal-striving processes.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010;95:985-1008.
23. VancouverJ. B.YoderR. J.MoreK. M.2011. Fitting some motivational puzzle pieces together: Testing a computational model of goals, expectancy, and value. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
24. Yeo G.B.,Neal A.An examination of dynamic relationship between self-efficacy and performance across levels of analysis and levels of specificity.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006;91:1088-1101.