Morphogen-based simulation model of ray growth and joint patterning during fin development and regeneration

Development

Volumn 139, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1188-1197

  Rolland Lagan, Anne Gaëlle ^a   Paquette, Mathieu ^a   Tweedle, Valerie ^a   Akimenko, Marie Andrée ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bone development; Pattern formation; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

MORPHOGEN;

AMPUTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE GROWTH; BONE REGENERATION; FIN (ORGAN); JOINT; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMAL FINS; ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE DEVELOPMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MORPHOGENESIS; OSTEOGENESIS; REGENERATION; ZEBRAFISH; ZEBRAFISH PROTEINS;

EID: 84857323516     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: 14779129     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.073452     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akimenko, M. A., Marí-Beffa, M., Becerra, J. and Géraudie, J. (2003). Old questions, new tools, and some answers to the mystery of fin regeneration. Dev. Dyn. 226, 190-201.
2. Baker, R. E., Schnell, S. and Maini, P. K. (2008). Mathematical models for somite formation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 81, 183-203.
3. Bénazet, J. and Zeller, R. (2009). Vertebrate limb development: moving from classical morphogen gradients to an integrated 4-dimensional patterning system. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 1, a001339.
4. Cheung, D., Miles, C., Kreitman, M. and Ma, J. (2011). Scaling of the Bicoid morphogen gradient by a volume-dependent production rate. Development 138, 2741-2749.
5. Cooper, K. L., Hu, J. K. H., Ten Berge, D., Fernandez-Teran, M., Ros, M. A. and Tabin, C. J. (2011). Initiation of proximal-distal patterning in the vertebrate limb by signals and growth. Science 332, 1083-1086.
6. Dubrulle, J. and Pourquié, O. (2004). Coupling segmentation to axis formation. Development 131, 5783-5793.
7. Dubrulle, J., McGrew, M. J. and Pourquié, O. (2001). FGF signaling controls somite boundary position and regulates segmentation clock control of spatiotemporal Hox gene activation. Cell 106, 219-232.
8. Géraudie, J. and Singer, M. (1985). Necessity of an adequate nerve supply for regeneration of the amputated pectoral fin in the teleost fundulus. J. Exp. Zool. 234, 367-374.
9. Goldsmith, M. I., Fisher, S., Waterman, R. and Johnson, S. L. (2003). Saltatory control of isometric growth in the zebrafish caudal fin is disrupted in long fin and rapunzel mutants. Dev. Biol. 259, 303-317.
10. Goldsmith, M. I., Iovine, M. K., O'Reilly-Pol, T. and Johnson, S. L. (2006). A developmental transition in growth control during zebrafish caudal fin development. Dev. Biol. 296, 450-457.
11. Haas, H. J. (1962). Studies on mechanisms of joint and bone formation in skeleton rays of fish fins. Dev. Biol. 5, 1-34.
12. Hoptak-Solga, A. D., Nielsen, S., Jain, I., Thummel, R., Hyde, D. R. and Iovine, M. K. (2008). Connexin43 (GJA1) is required in the population of dividing cells during fin regeneration. Dev. Biol. 317, 541-548.
13. Huang, C. C., Wang, T. C., Lin, B. H., Wang, Y. W., Johnson, S. L. and Yu, J. (2009). Collagen IX is required for the integrity of Collagen II fibrils and the regulation of vascular plexus formation in zebrafish caudal fins. Dev. Biol. 332, 360-370.
14. Iovine, M. K. (2007). Conserved mechanisms regulate outgrowth in zebrafish fins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 613-618.
15. Iovine, M. K. and Johnson, S. L. (2000). Genetic analysis of isometric growth control mechanisms in the zebrafish caudal fin. Genetics 155, 1321-1329.
16. Iovine, M. K., Higgins, E. P., Hindes, A., Coblitz, B. and Johnson, S. L. (2005). Mutations in connexin43 (GJA1) perturb bone growth in zebrafish fins. Dev. Biol. 278, 208-219.
17. Jain, I., Stroka, C., Yan, J. Y., Huang, W. M. and Iovine, M. K. (2007). Bone growth in zebrafish fins occurs via multiple pulses of cell proliferation. Dev. Dyn. 236, 2668-2674.
18. Kondo, S. and Miura, T. (2010). Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science 329, 1616-1620.
19. Lander, A. D., Lo, W., Nie, Q. and Wan, F. Y. M. (2009). The measure of success: constraints, objectives, and tradeoffs in morphogen-mediated patterning. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 1, a002022.
20. Lee, Y., Grill, S., Sanchez, A., Murphy-Ryan, M. and Poss, K. D. (2005). Fgf signaling instructs position-dependent growth rate during zebrafish fin regeneration. Development 132, 5173-5183.
21. Mariani, F. V., Ahn, C. P. and Martin, G. R. (2008). Genetic evidence that FGFs have an instructive role in limb proximal-distal patterning. Nature 453, 401-405.
22. Marí-Beffa, M. and Murciano, C. (2010). Dermoskeleton morphogenesis in zebrafish fins. Dev. Dyn. 239, 2779-2794.
23. Marí-Beffa, M., Marín-Girón, F., Montes, G. S. and Becerra, J. (1999). Morphometric study of the regeneration of individual rays in teleost tail fins. J. Anat. 195, 393-405.
24. Meinhardt, H. (2009). In The Algorithmic Beauty of Seashells, pp. 279. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
25. Murciano, C., Fernández, T. D., Durán, I., Maseda, D., Ruiz-Sánchez, J., Becerra, J., Akimenko, M. A. and Marí-Beffa, M. (2002). Ray-interray interactions during fin regeneration of Danio rerio. Dev. Biol. 252, 214-224.
26. Murciano, C., Pérez-Claros, J., Smith, A., Avaron, F., Fernández, T. D., Durán, I., Ruiz-Sánchez, J., García, F., Becerra, J., Akimenko, M. A. et al. (2007). Position dependence of hemiray morphogenesis during tail fin regeneration in Danio rerio. Dev. Biol. 312, 272-283.
27. Murray, P. J., Maini, P. K. and Baker, R. E. (2011). The clock and wavefront model revisited. J. Theor. Biol. 283, 227-238.
28. Poss, K. D., Keating, M. T. and Nechiporuk, A. (2003). Tales of regeneration in zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 226, 202-210.
29. Quint, E., Smith, A., Avaron, F., Laforest, L., Miles, J., Gaffield, W. and Akimenko, M. A. (2002). Bone patterning is altered in the regenerating zebrafish caudal fin after ectopic expression of sonic hedgehog and bmp2b or exposure to cyclopamine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8713-8718.
30. Rosello-Diez, A., Ros, M. A. and Torres, M. (2011). Diffusible signals, not autonomous mechanisms, determine the main proximodistal limb subdivision. Science 332, 1086-1088.
31. Schulte, C. J., Allen, C., England, S. J., Juárez-Morales, J. L. and Lewis, K. E. (2011). Evx1 is required for joint formation in zebrafish fin dermoskeleton. Dev. Dyn. 240, 1240-1248.
32. Schwank, G. and Basler, K. (2010). Regulation of organ growth by morphogen gradients. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2, a001669.
33. Sims, K., Eble, D. M. and Iovine, M. K. (2009). Connexin43 regulates joint location in zebrafish fins. Dev. Biol. 327, 410-418.
34. Tabin, C. and Wolpert, L. (2007). Rethinking the proximodistal axis of the vertebrate limb in the molecular era. Genes Dev. 21, 1433-1442.
35. vanEeden, F. J. M., Granato, M., Schach, U., Brand, M., Furutani-Seiki, M., Haffter, P., Hammerschmidt, M., Heisenberg, C. P., Jiang, Y. J., Kane, D. A. et al. (1996). Genetic analysis of fin formation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123, 255-262.
36. Wagner, G. P. and Misof, B. Y. (1992). Evolutionary modification of regenerative capability in vertebrates - a comparative study on teleost pectoral fin regeneration. J. Exp. Zool. 261, 62-78.
37. Wartlick, O., Kicheva, A. and Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. (2009). Morphogen gradient formation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 1, a001255.
38. Wills, A. A., Kidd, A. R., Lepilina, A. and Poss, K. D. (2008). Fgfs control homeostatic regeneration in adult zebrafish fins. Development 135, 3063-3070.
39. Yin, V. P. and Poss, K. D. (2008). New regulators of vertebrate appendage regeneration. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 18, 381-386.