The Donor-conceived Child's 'Right to Personal Identity': The Public Debate on Donor Anonymity in the United Kingdom

Journal of Law and Society

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 58-75

  Turkmendag, Ilke ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; ARTICLE; CIVIL RIGHTS; DIRECTED TISSUE DONATION; DONOR; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; ETHNOLOGY; FERTILIZATION; HISTORY; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOPTION; CIVIL RIGHTS; DIRECTED TISSUE DONATION; FERTILIZATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; JURISPRUDENCE; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84857284487     PISSN: 0263323X     EISSN: 14676478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00570.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. The most common assisted reproduction method. It involves removal of sperm and eggs (gametes) from the couple to produce embryos in the laboratory. If the patient cannot conceive their own gametes, donated gametes or embryos can be used. 'Donor conception' refers to the use of gametes or embryos that have been donated by a third person to enable intended recipients to become parents.
2. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), 'For parents of donor-conceived children' (2008)
3. M. Strathern, After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century (1992).
4. D. Eisner, 'Just Another Reproductive Technology? The Ethics of Human Reproductive Cloning as an Experimental Medical Procedure' (2006) 32 J. of Medical Ethics 596-600.
5. I. Turkmendag, 'The Removal of Donor Anonymity in the UK: The Silencing of Claims by Would-be Parents' (2009) University of Nottingham.
6. HFEA Register (2008)
7. Number of sperm and egg donors
8. 'Push for sperm and egg donors'BBC News, 15 June 1998
9. J.N. Robinson et al., 'Attitudes of donors and recipients to gamete donation' (1991) 6 Human Reproduction 307-9
10. L.R. Schover et al., 'The personality and motivation of semen donors: a comparison with oocyte donors' (1992) 7 Human Reproduction 575-9
11. S. Golombok, 'Ethics and society: A survey of semen donation: phase II - the view of the donors' (1995) 10 Human Reproduction 951-9
12. S. Paul et al., 'Recruitment of sperm donors: the Newcastle-upon-Tyne experience 1994-2003' (2006) 21 Human Reproduction 150-8.
13. H. Blumer, 'Social Problems as Collective Behavior' (1971) 18 Social Problems 298-306
14. M. Spector and J.I. Kitsuse, Constructing Social Problems (1977)
15. J.W. Schneider, 'Social Problems Theory: The Constructionist View' (1985) 11 Annual Rev. of Sociology 209-29.
16. Spector and Kituse
17. D.R. Loseke and J. Best, Social Problems: Constructionist Readings (2003).
18. P. Conrad, 'Public Eyes and Private Genes: Historical Frames, News Constructions, and Social Problems' (1997) 44 Social Problems 139-54.
19. S. Simpson, 'Call to trace sperm donor parents'BBC News, 18 November 1998
20. Liberty, press release, 26 July 2002.
21. Rose and Another v. Secretary of State for Health and HFEA [] EWHC 1593 (Admin).2002
22. In the case, EM's mother acted as her litigation friend.
23. Mikuliæ v. Croatia application no. 53176/99.2002
24. Ipsos/MORI, 'British Public Backs Donor-Conceived Children's Rights to their Identity
25. 'Poll on donors favours information'BioNews 164, 1 July 2002
26. 'Call to end sperm donor anonymity'BBC News, 26 June 2002
27. C. Dyer, 'Pressure increases on UK government to remove anonymity from sperm donors' (2002) 324 Brit. Medical J. 1237.
28. Department of Health (DoH), 'Donor information consultation: providing information about gamete or embryo donors' (2001).
29. DoH, 'Summary of Responses Received to the Donor Information Consultation' (2003).
30. E. Blyth and L. Frith, 'The UK's gamete donor "crisis"- a critical analysis' (2008) 28 Critical Social Policy 74-95.
31. I. Turkmendag, R. Dingwall, and T. Murphy, 'The Removal of Donor Anonymity in the UK: The Silencing of Claims by Would-be Parents' (2008) 22 International J. of Law, Policy and the Family 283-310.
32. C. Dyer, 'Egg or sperm donation children will be entitled to more information' (2003) 326 Brit. Medical J. 240.
33. M. Johnson MP, 416 H.C. Debs. col. 60WS (21 January 2004).
34. Delegated Legislation Committee Debs., Draft Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (Disclosure of Donor Information) Regulations 2004 (First Standing Committee) 18 May 2004
35. Baroness Andrews, 662 H.L. Debs. cols. 344-8 (9 June 2004).
36. The Department of Health undertook a public consultation exercise over the summer and autumn of on possible changes to update the law and regulation relating to human reproductive technologies.2005
37. British Association for Adoption & Fostering, 'BAAF Response to Department of Health Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act' (2005).
38. Baroness Warnock, 662 H.L. Debs. col. 356 (9 June 2004).
39. British Fertility Society (BFS), 'BFS Response to the Department of Health Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act' (2007).
40. M. Henderson, 'Sperm donor figures rising despite loss of anonymity'Times, 4 May 2007.
41. 'Infertility Network UK Response to HFEA Press Release On Latest Figures For Sperm Donor Recruitment'Medical News Today, 3 May 2007
42. DoH, Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: Proposals for revised legislation (including establishment of the Regulatory Authority for Tissue and Embryos (20066989
43. It was also suggested that donor-conceived children should know their donor to ascertain their medical history, albeit that medical predictions can be made just as accurately from one's own body.
44. 'Sperm donors to lose anonymity'BBC News, 21 January 2004
45. J. Best, Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems (1995) 8.
46. D.R. Loseke, Thinking about Social Problems: An Introduction to Constructionist Perspectives (2003).
47. J. Feast, 'The right to an identity'Observer, 26 June 2002.
48. K. Wegar, Adoption, Identity, and Kinship: The Debate Over Sealed Birth Records (1997).
49. Wegar refers to adopted children's rights movement to access to sealed birth records in United States (from the s) as the 'search movement'.1970
50. J. Triseliotis, In Search of Origins (1973)
51. A. McWhinnie, 'Gamete donation and anonymity: Should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents?' (2001) 16 Human Reproduction 807-17.
52. S. Maclean and M. Maclean, 'Keeping Secrets in Assisted Reproduction - the Tension between Donor Anonymity and the Need of the Child for Information' (1996) 8 Child and Family Law Q. 243-51.
53. E. Haimes, 'The making of "the DI child": changing representations of people conceived through donor insemination' in Donor Insemination: International Social Science Perspectives, eds. K.R. Daniels and E. Haimes (1998) 53-75.
54. S. Golombok, 'Anonymity - or not - in the Donation of Gametes and Embryos' Regulating Autonomy: Sex, Reproduction and Family, eds. S. Day Sclater, F. Ebtejah, E. Jackson, and M. Richards (2009) 223-38.
55. C. Smart, 'Law and the Regulation of Family Secrets' (2010) 24 International J. of Law, Policy and the Family 397-483
56. S. Golombok et al., 'Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3' (2006) 21 Human Reproduction 1918-24.
57. J. Burr and P. Reynolds, 'Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children' (2008) 34 J. of Medical Ethics 281-4
58. H.L. Nelson, 'Dethroning Choice: Analogy, Personhood, and the New Reproductive Technologies' (1995) 23 J. of Law, Medicine & Ethics 129130.
59. K. O'Donovan, 'A right to know one's parentage?' (1988) International J. of Law, Policy and the Family 27-45
60. C. Thompson, Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies (2005).
61. K. Hoeyer et al., 'Embryonic Entitlements: Stem Cell Patenting and the Co-production of Commodities and Personhood' (2009) 15 Body & Society 1-24.
62. N. Pfeffer and J. Kent, 'Framing Women, Framing Fetuses: How Britain Regulates Arrangements for the Collection and Use of Aborted Fetuses in Stem Cell Research and Therapies' (2007) 2 BioSocieties 429-47.
63. J. Wallbank, 'The role of rights and utility in instituting a child's right to know her genetic history' (2004) 13 Social and Legal Studies 245-64