Spanish, French, and British Cross-Cultural Validation of the European Brain Injury Questionnaire

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 478-488

  Caracuel, Alfonso ^a   Bateman, Andrew ^b   Teasdale, Thomas W ^c   Verdejo García, Antonio ^a   Pérez García, Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b The Princess of Wales Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Acquired brain injury; Adults; Behavior; Cognition; Construct validity; Cross cultural validity; EBIQ; Emotion; Factor analysis; Outcome assessment; Questionnaire; Rasch analysis; Stroke; Subjective assessment; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITION; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEPRESSION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPAIN; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DEPRESSION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPAIN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857279598     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: 1550509X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181fc042c     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Teasdale T, Christensen A, Willmes K, et al. Subjective experience in brain-injured patients and their close relatives: a European Brain Injury Questionnaire study. Brain Inj. 1997;11(8):543-563.
2. Deloche G, North P, Dellatolas G, et al. Le handicap des adultes cérébrolésés: le point de vue des patients et de leur entourage. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 1996;39(1):1-9.
3. Deloche G, Dellatolas G, Christensen A. The European Brain Injury Questionnaire. In: Christensen A-L, Uzzell BP, eds. International Handbook of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2000:81-92.
4. Christensen A, Svendsen H, Willmes K. Subjective experience in brain-injured patients and their close relatives: European Brain Injury Questionnaire studies. Acta Neuropsychologica. 2005;3(1/2):60-68.
5. Sopena S, Dewar B, Nannery R, Teasdale T, Wilson B. The European Brain Injury Questionnaire (EBIQ) as a reliable outcome measure for use with people with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2007;21(10):1063-1068.
6. Souza L, Braga L, Filho G, Dellatolas G. Quality-of-life: child and parent perspectives following severe traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurorehabil. 2007;10(1):35-47.
7. Bateman A, Teasdale TW, Willmes K. Assessing construct validity of the self-rating version of the European Brain Injury Questionnaire (EBIQ) using Rasch analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(6):941-954.
8. Engberg AW, Teasdale TW. Psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults: a long-term population-based follow-up. Brain Inj. 2004;18(6):533-545.
9. Mathiesen BB, Weinryb RM. Unstable identity and prefrontal injury. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2004;9(4):249.
10. McCrimmon S, Oddy M. Return to work following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20(10):1037.
11. Björkdahl A, Lundgren Nilsson Å, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K. The structural properties of the European Brain Injury Questionnaire. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;13(3):122-128.
12. Holm S, Schönberger M, Poulsen I, Caetano C. Patients' and relatives' experience of difficulties following severe traumatic brain injury: the sub-acute stage. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(3):444-460.
13. Williams W, Evans J, Willson B. Outcome measures for survivors of acquired brain injury in day and outpatient neurorehabilitation programmes. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1999;9(3):421-436.
14. Boman I, Lindstedt M, Hemmingsson H, Bartfai A. Cognitive training in home environment. Brain Inj. 2004;18(10):985-995.
15. Caracuel A, Verdejo-García A, Vilar-Lopez R, et al. Frontal behavioral and emotional symptoms in Spanish individuals with acquired brain injury and substance use disorders. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23(4):447-454.
16. Coetzer R, Rushe R. Post-acute rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: are both early and later improved outcomes possible? Int J Rehabil Res. 2005;28:361-363.
17. Dewar B, Wilson BA. Cognitive recovery from encephalitis lethargica. Brain Inj. 2005;19(14):1285-1291.
18. Svendsen H, Teasdale T. The influence of neuropsychological rehabilitation on symptomatology and quality of life following brain injury: a controlled long-term follow-up. Brain Inj. 2006;20(12):1295-1306.
19. Schönberger M, Humle F, Zeeman P, Teasdale TW. Patient compliance in brain injury rehabilitation in relation to awareness and cognitive and physical improvement. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2006;16(5):561-578.
20. Svendsen H, Teasdale T, Pinner M. Subjective experience in patients with brain injury and their close relatives before and after a rehabilitation programme. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14:495-515.
21. Martin C, Viguier D, Deloche G, Dellatolas G. Subjective experience after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2001;15(11):947-959.
22. Martin C, Dellatolas G, Viguier D, Willadino-Braga L, Deloche G. Subjective experience after stroke. Appl Neuropsychol. 2002;9(3):148.
23. Santos ME, De Sousa L, Castro-Caldas A. Avaliação da experiência subjectiva em pessoas com lesão cerebral: Adaptação para a população portuguesa do European Brain Injury Questionnaire (EBIQ). Análise Psicológica. 2001;19(2):219-236.
24. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1980.
25. Wilson M. Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modelling Approach. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005.
26. Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P. Measurement properties of the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and improvement patterns during inpatient rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15(1):637-655.
27. Lawton G, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. Cross-cultural validity of FIM in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(12):746-752.
28. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
29. Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model. Med Care. 2004;42(1):1-37.
30. Tesio L. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(3):105-115.
31. Prigatano G, Ogano M, Amakusa B. A cross-cultural study on impaired self-awareness in Japanese patients with brain dysfunction. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1997;10(2):135-143.
32. Chen C. Transcultural expression of subcortical vascular disease. J Neurol Sci. 2004;226(1/2):45-47.
33. Puente A Agranovich AV. The cultural in cross-cultural neuropsychology. In: Goldstein G, Beers S. eds. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment. Vol 1: Intellectual and neuropsychological assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004:321-332.
34. Linacre J. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;7(4).
35. Temkin NR, Corrigan JD, Dikmen SS, Machamer J. Social functioning after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(6):460-467.
36. Hagquist C, Bruce M, Gustavsson J. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(3):380-393.
37. Tennant A, Conaghan P. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care Res. 2007;57(8):1358-1362.
38. Linacre J. Understanding Rasch measurement: optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3(1):85-106.
39. Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM2020. Perth, Australia: RUMM Laboratory; 2003.
40. Gorsuch R. Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis. J Pers Assess. 1997;68(3):532-560.
41. Davidson M. Rasch analysis of three versions of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Man Ther. 2008;13(3):222-231.
42. Wright BD, Masters G. Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 1982.
43. Smith RM, Miao CY. Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement. In: Wilson M ed. Objective Measurement: Theory into Practice. Vol 2. Norwood NJ: Ablex; 1994:316-327.
44. Tennant A, Pallant JF. Unidimensionality matters! Rasch Meas Trans. 2006;20(1):1048-1051.
45. Smith R. Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models. J Appl Meas. 2000;1(2):199-218.
46. Fisher WJ. Reliability statistics. Rasch Meas Trans. 1992;6(3):238.
47. Dikmen SS, Bombardier CH, Machamer JE, Fann JR, Temkin NR. Natural history of depression in traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(9):1457-1464.
48. Dikmen S, Corrigan J, Lewin H, et al. Cognitive outcome following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(6):430-438.
49. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:202-207.
50. Tucker DM, Luu P, Pribram KH. Social and emotional self-regulation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;769:213-239.
51. Tennant A, Pallant J. DIF matters: a practical approach to test if Differential Item Functioning makes a difference. Rasch Meas Trans. 2007;20(4):1082-1084.