The moving phantom: Motor execution or motor imagery?

Cortex

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 746-757

  Raffin, Estelle ^a,b,c   Giraux, Pascal ^a,b,c,e   Reilly, Karen T ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^b LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d CNRS   (France)

^e SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE   (France)

Author keywords

Brain plasticity; Motor execution; Motor imagery; Phantom limb

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGNOSIA; AMPUTATION STUMP; ARM; ARM AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGERY; LIMB MOVEMENT; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE; PHANTOM LIMB MOVEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSORY FEEDBACK; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMPUTEES; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FINGERS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PAIN; PHANTOM LIMB; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; THUMB; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860369010     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Borsook D., Becerra L., Fishman S., Edwards A., Jennings C.L., Stojanovic M., et al. Acute plasticity in the human somatosensory cortex following amputation. NeuroReport 1998, 9(6):1013-1017.
2. Chan B.L., Witt R., Charrow A.P., Magee A., Howard R., Pasquina P.F., et al. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. The New England Journal of Medicine 2007, 357(21):2206-2207.
3. Cole J., Crowle S., Austwick G., Slater D.H. Exploratory findings with virtual reality for phantom limb pain; from stump motion to agency and analgesia. Disability and Rehabilitation 2009, 31(10):846-854.
4. Cronholm B. Phantom limbs in amputees; a study of changes in the integration of centripetal impulses with special reference to referred sensations. Acta Psychiatrica et Neurologica Scandinavica, Supplementum 1951, 72:1-310.
5. Decety J. The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behavioural Brain Research 1996, 77(1-2):45-52.
6. Decety J., Jeannerod M., Prablanc C. The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research 1989, 34(1-2):35-42.
7. Decety J., Perani D., Jeannerod M., Bettinardi V., Tadary B., Woods R., et al. Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature 1994, 371(6498):600-602.
8. Ersland L., Rosen G., Lundervold A., Smievoll A.I., Tillung T., Sundberg H., et al. Phantom limb imaginary fingertapping causes primary motor cortex activation: An fMRI study. Neuroreport 1996, 8(1):207-210.
9. Fadiga L., Buccino G., Craighero L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Pavesi G. Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: A magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37(2):147-158.
10. Flor H., Elbert T., Knecht S., Wienbruch C., Pantev C., Birbaumer N., et al. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 1995, 375(6531):482-484.
11. Gaggioli A., Morganti F., Walker R., Meneghini A., Alcaniz M., Lozano J.A., et al. Training with computer-supported motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2004, 7(3):327-332.
12. Gagné M., Reilly K.T., Hetu S., Mercier C. Motor control over the phantom limb in above-elbow amputees and its relationship with phantom limb pain. Neuroscience 2009, 162(1):78-86.
13. Gandevia S.C., Wilson L.R., Inglis J.T., Burke D. Mental rehearsal of motor tasks recruits alpha-motoneurones but fails to recruit human fusimotor neurones selectively. The Journal of Physiology 1997, 505(Pt 1):259-266.
14. Gerardin E., Sirigu A., Lehericy S., Poline J.B., Gaymard B., Marsault C., et al. Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex 2000, 10(11):1093-1104.
15. Giraux P., Sirigu A. Illusory movements of the paralyzed limb restore motor cortex activity. NeuroImage 2003, 20(Suppl. 1):S107-S111.
16. Gregg M., Hall C., Butler A. The MIQ-RS: A suitable option for examining movement imagery ability. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2007, 7(2):249-257.
17. Guillot A., Collet C. Duration of mentally simulated movement: A review. Journal of Motor Behavior 2005, 37(1):10-20.
18. Guillot A., Lebon F., Rouffet D., Champely S., Doyon J., Collet C. Muscular responses during motor imagery as a function of muscle contraction types. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 66(1):18-27.
19. Hanakawa T., Immisch I., Toma K., Dimyan M.A., Van Gelderen P., Hallett M. Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89(2):989-1002.
20. Harris A.J. Cortical origin of pathological pain. Lancet 1999, 354(9188):1464-1466.
21. Hashimoto R., Rothwell J.C. Dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 125(1):75-81.
22. Hugdahl K., Rosen G., Ersland L., Lundervold A., Smievoll A.I., Barndon R., et al. Common pathways in mental imagery and pain perception: An fMRI study of a subject with an amputated arm. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2001, 42(3):269-275.
23. Jeannerod M., Decety J. Mental motor imagery: A window into the representational stages of action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1995, 5(6):727-732.
24. Karl A., Birbaumer N., Lutzenberger W., Cohen L.G., Flor H. Reorganization of motor and somatosensory cortex in upper extremity amputees with phantom limb pain. The Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21(10):3609-3618.
25. Knecht S., Henningsen H., Elbert T., Flor H., Hohling C., Pantev C., et al. Reorganizational and perceptional changes after amputation. Brain 1996, 119(Pt 4):1213-1219.
26. Lacourse M.G., Orr E.L., Cramer S.C., Cohen M.J. Brain activation during execution and motor imagery of novel and skilled sequential hand movements. NeuroImage 2005, 27(3):505-519.
27. Lebon F., Rouffet D., Collet C., Guillot A. Modulation of EMG power spectrum frequency during motor imagery. Neuroscience Letters 2008, 435(3):181-185.
28. Lotze M., Flor H., Grodd W., Larbig W., Birbaumer N. Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain 2001, 124(Pt 11):2268-2277.
29. Lotze M., Halsband U. Motor imagery. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2006, 99(4-6):386-395.
30. Lotze M., Montoya P., Erb M., Hulsmann E., Flor H., Klose U., et al. Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(5):491-501.
31. MacIver K., Lloyd D.M., Kelly S., Roberts N., Nurmikko T. Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery. Brain 2008, 131(Pt 8):2181-2191.
32. Malouin F., Richards C.L., Desrosiers J., Doyon J. Bilateral slowing of mentally simulated actions after stroke. Neuroreport 2004, 15(8):1349-1353.
33. Malouin F., Richards C.L., Durand A., Descent M., Poire D., Fremont P., et al. Effects of practice, visual loss, limb amputation, and disuse on motor imagery vividness. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009, 23(5):449-463.
34. McCabe C. Mirror visual feedback therapy. A practical approach. Journal of Hand Therapy, 2010, doi:10.1016/j.jht.2010.08.003.
35. McCabe C.S., Haigh R.C., Blake D.R. Mirror visual feedback for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1). Current Pain and Headache Reports 2008, 12(2):103-107.
36. McCabe C.S., Haigh R.C., Ring E.F., Halligan P.W., Wall P.D., Blake D.R. A controlled pilot study of the utility of mirror visual feedback in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003, 42(1):97-101.
37. Melzack R. Phantom limbs. Scientific American 1992, 266(4):120-126.
38. Mercier C., Sirigu A. Training with virtual visual feedback to alleviate phantom limb pain. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009, 23(6):587-594.
39. Michielsen M.E., Selles R.W., van der Geest J.N., Eckhardt M., Yavuzer G., Stam H.J., et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: A phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2010, 25(2):223-233.
40. Mitchell S.W. Injuries of Nerves and their Consequences 1872, Lippincott, Philadelphia.
41. Murray C.D., Pettifer S., Howard T., Patchick E.L., Caillette F., Kulkarni J., et al. The treatment of phantom limb pain using immersive virtual reality: Three case studies. Disability and Rehabilitation 2007, 29(18):1465-1469.
42. Nico D., Daprati E., Rigal F., Parsons L., Sirigu A. Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. Brain 2004, 127(Pt 1):120-132.
43. Parsons L.M. Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20(4):709-730.
44. Ramachandran V.S., Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain 1998, 121(Pt 9):1603-1630.
45. Ramachandran V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences 1996, 263(1369):377-386.
46. Ramsey R., Cumming J., Eastough D., Edwards M.G. Incongruent imagery interferes with action initiation. Brain and Cognition 2010, 74(3):249-254.
47. Reilly K.T., Mercier C., Schieber M.H., Sirigu A. Persistent hand motor commands in the amputees' brain. Brain 2006, 129(Pt 8):2211-2223.
48. Roland P.E., Larsen B., Lassen N.A., Skinhoj E. Supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movements in man. Journal of Neurophysiology 1980, 43(1):118-136.
49. Rosen G., Hugdahl K., Ersland L., Lundervold A., Smievoll A.I., Barndon R., et al. Different brain areas activated during imagery of painful and non-painful 'finger movements' in a subject with an amputated arm. Neurocase 2001, 7(3):255-260.
50. Roux F.E., Ibarrola D., Lazorthes Y., Berry I. Virtual movements activate primary sensorimotor areas in amputees: Report of three cases. Neurosurgery 2001, 49(3):736-741.
51. Roux F.E., Lotterie J.A., Cassol E., Lazorthes Y., Sol J.C., Berry I. Cortical areas involved in virtual movement of phantom limbs: Comparison with normal subjects. Neurosurgery 2003, 53(6):1342-1352.
52. Sathian K., Greenspan A.I., Wolf S.L. Doing it with mirrors: A case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2000, 14(1):73-76.
53. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.R. Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13(7):910-919.
54. Skoura X., Personnier P., Vinter A., Pozzo T., Papaxanthis C. Decline in motor prediction in elderly subjects: Right versus left arm differences in mentally simulated motor actions. Cortex 2008, 44(9):1271-1278.
55. Solodkin A., Hlustik P., Chen E.E., Small S.L. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(11):1246-1255.
56. Stephan K.M., Fink G.R., Passingham R.E., Silbersweig D., Ceballos-Baumann A.O., Frith C.D., et al. Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 73(1):373-386.
57. Stevens J.A., Stoykov M.E. Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003, 84(7):1090-1092.
58. Wade N.J. Beyond body experiences: Phantom limbs, pain and the locus of sensation. Cortex 2009, 45(2):243-255.
59. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(Suppl):1212-1217.
60. Yavuzer G., Selles R., Sezer N., Sutbeyaz S., Bussmann J.B., Koseoglu F., et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008, 89(3):393-398.