Seismic demand of low-rise multistory systems with general asymmetry

Journal of Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-11

  Dutta, Sekhar Chandra ^a,b   Roy, Rana ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BHUBANESWAR   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

General class of asymmetry; Inelastic; Multistory; Seismic

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC MODELS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; ELASTIC RANGES; FLEXIBLE SYSTEM; GENERAL CLASS; INELASTIC; INELASTIC SEISMIC BEHAVIOR; MULTISTORY; REDUCTION FACTOR; SEISMIC; SEISMIC DEMANDS; STIFF SYSTEMS; STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS; TORSIONAL MODES;

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MECHANICS;

SEISMOLOGY;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECCENTRICITY; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84857204055     PISSN: 07339399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000303     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Basu D. Jain S.K. Alternative method to locate center of rigidity in asymmetric buildings. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2007, 36(7):965-973. IJEEBG, 1096-9845, 10.1002/eqe.658.
2. Chandler A.M. Duan X.N. modified static procedure for the design of torsionally unbalanced multistory frame buildings. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1993, 22(5):447-462. IJEEBG, 1096-9845, 10.1002/eqe.4290220507.
3. Chopra A.K. Goel R.K. Evaluation of torsional provisions in seismic codes. J. Struct. Eng. 1991, 117(12):3762-3782. JSENDH, 0733-9445, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:12(3762).
4. Dempsey K.M. Tso W.K. An alternative path to seismic torsional provisions. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 1982, 1(1):3-10. IJDEDD, 0261-7277, 10.1016/0261-7277(82)90008-0.
5. De la Llera J.C. Chopra A.K. Inelastic behaviour of asymmetric multistory buildings. J. Struct. Eng. 1996, 122(6):597-606. JSENDH, 0733-9445, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:6(597).
6. Duan X.N. Chandler A.M. Inelastic seismic response of code-designed multistory frame buildings with regular asymmetry. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1993, 22(5):431-445. IJEEBG, 1096-9845, 10.1002/eqe.4290220506.
7. Dutta S.C. Das P.K. Inelastic seismic response of code-designed reinforced concrete asymmetric buildings with strength degradation. Eng. Struct. 2002, 24(10):1295-1314. ENSTDF, 0141-0296, 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00062-7, and (a).
8. Dutta S.C. Das P.K. Validity and applicability of two simple hysteresis model to assess progressive seismic damage in R/C asymmetric buildings. J. Sound Vib. 2002, 257(4):753-777. JSVIAG, 0022-460X, 10.1006/jsvi.2002.5093, and (b).
9. Dutta S.C. Das P.K. Roy R. Seismic behaviour of code-designed bi-directionally systems. J. Struct. Eng. 2005, 131(10):1497-1514. JSENDH, 0733-9445, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:10(1497).
10. Goel R.K. Seismic response of asymmetric system: Energy based approach. J. Struct. Eng. 1997, 123(11):1444-1453. JSENDH, 0733-9445, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:11(1444).
11. Harasimowicz A.P. Goel R.K. Seismic code analysis of multi-storey asymmetric buildings. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1998, 27(2):173-185. IJEEBG, 1096-9845, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199802)27:2<173::AID-EQE724>3.0.CO;2-W.
12. Hejal R. Chopra A.K. Response spectrum analysis of class of torsionally coupled buildings. Eng. Mech. 1989, 115(8):1761-1781. JMCEA3, 0044-7951, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:8(1761).
13. Humar J.L. Kumar P. Torsional motion of buildings during earthquakes. I. Elastic response. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 1998, 25(5):898-916. CJCEB8, 0315-1468, 10.1139/l98-031.
14. Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. 1984, Bureau of Indian Standards Bureau of Indian Standards 1893-1984, New Delhi, India.
15. Kan C.L. Chopra A.K. Effects of torsional coupling on earthquake forces in buildings. J. Struct. Div. 1977, 103(4):805-819. JSDEAG, 0044-8001, and (a).
16. Kan C.L. Chopra A.K. Elastic earthquake analysis of a class of torsionally coupled buildings. J. Struct. Div. 1977, 103(4):821-838. JSDEAG, 0044-8001, and (b).
17. Kan C.L. Chopra A.K. Simple model for earthquake response studies of torsionally coupled buildings. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 1981, 107(5):935-951. JMCEA3, 0044-7951, and (a).
18. Kan C.L. Chopra A.K. Torsional coupling and earthquake response of simple elastic and inelastic systems. J. Struct. Div. 1981, 107(8):1569-1588. JSDEAG, 0044-8001, and (b).
19. Khan M.R. Improved method of generation of artificial time histories, rich in all frequencies. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1987, 15(8):985-992. IJEEBG, 1096-9845, 10.1002/eqe.4290150805.
20. Mahin S.A. Bertero V.V. An evaluation of inelastic seismic design spectra. J. Struct. Div. 1981, 107(9):1777-1795. JSENDH, 0733-9445.
21. Marino E.M. Rossi P.P. Exact evaluation of the location of the optimum torsion axis. Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 2004, 13(4):277-290. SDTBEH, 1541-7794, 10.1002/tal.252.
22. Roy R. Inelastic seismic behaviour of multistoried structures highlighting the effects of asymmetry, soil-flexibility, degradation and blast loading. 2009 Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Bengal Engineering and Science Univ., Shibpur, Howrah, West Bengal, India.
23. Rutenberg A. EAEE Task Group (TG) 8: Behaviour of irregular and complex structures-Progress since 1998. Proc., 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2002 (CD-ROM), London.
24. Rutenberg A. Tso W.K. Horizontally irregular structures: Some recent developments. Proc., Int. Workshop on Performance-Based Seismic Design Concepts and Implementation 2004 Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, Univ. of California, Richmond, CA.
25. Tso W.K. Static eccentricity concept for torsional moment estimations. J. Struct. Eng. 1990, 116(5):1199-1212. JSENDH, 0733-9445, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:5(1199).
26. Tso W.K. Zhu T.J. Design of torsionally unbalanced structural systems based on code provisions I: Ductility demand. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1992, 21(7):609-627. IJEEBG, 1096-9845, 10.1002/eqe.4290210704.
27. Tso W.K. Smith R.S. H. Re-evaluation of seismic torsional provisions. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1999, 28(8):899-917. IJEEBG, 1096-9845, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199908)28:8<899::AID-EQE846>3.0.CO;2-Q.
28. Zhu T.J. Tso W.K. Design of torsionally unbalanced structural systems based on code provisions II: Strength distribution. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1992, 21(7):629-644. IJEEBG, 1096-9845, 10.1002/eqe.4290210705.