Radiology and pregnancy. Principles, general requirements and exposure;Radiologie und schwangerschaft: Grundlagen, rahmenbedingungen und belastungen

Radiologe

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 81-92

  Weisser, G ^a   Steil, V ^a   Neff, K W ^a   Busing K A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Contrast media; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pregnancy; Radiation dosage

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; RADIATION INJURY; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL EXPOSURE DELAYED EFFECTS; RADIATION INJURIES; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 84857179028     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-011-2262-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Landesgesundheitsamt Baden-Württemberg (2005) Leitfaden "Mutterschutz im Krankenhaus", 2. Aufl. Kapitel C3: Diagnostik, S 39-45, http://www.gesundheitsamt-bw.de
2. Berichte der Strahlenschutzkommission (2003) Heft 36: Empfehlungen zur sicheren Anwendung magnetischer Resonanzverfahren in der medizinischen Diagnostik: Empfehlung der Strahlenschutzkommission, ISBN 3-437-22177-9
3. Berufsgenossenschaftliche Vorschriften BGV B11 "Elektromagnetische Felder" vom 1. Juni 2001, http://www.arbeitssicherheit.de
4. Richtlinie 2004/40/EG des Europäischen Rates vom 29. April 2004 über Mindestvorschriften zum Schutz von Sicherheit und Gesundheit der Arbeitnehmer vor der Gefährdung durch physikalische Einwirkungen (elektromagnetische Felder) (18. Einzelrichtlinie im Sinne des Artikels 16 Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 89/391/EWG)
5. DGMP-Bericht Nr. 7(2002) Pränatale Strahlenexposition aus medizinischer Indikation. Dosisermittlung, Folgerungen für Arzt und Schwangere. ISBN 3-925218-74-2
6. Junkermann H (2007) Indikationen und Kontraindikationen kontrastmittelverstärkter MRT-und CT-Untersuchungen in der Schwangerschaft. Radiologe 47:774-777 (Pubitemid 47459035)
7. Fowlkes JB, Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (2008) American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine consensus report on potential bioeffects of diagnostic ultrasound: executive summary. J Ultrasound Med (2008) 27:503-515 (Pubitemid 351489676)
8. Schreiner-Karoussou A (2008) Review of existing issues and practices with respect to irradiation of patients and staff during pregnancy. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:299-302
9. Akimoto S, Nagaoka T, Saito K et al (2010) Comparison of SAR in realistic fetus models of two fetal positions exposed to electromagnetic wave from business portable radio close to maternal abdomen. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:734-737
10. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR et al (1994) A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170 (1 Pt 1):32-33 (Pubitemid 24084026)
11. Carnes KI, Magin RL (1996) Effects of in utero exposure to 4.7 T MR imaging conditions on fetal growth and testicular development in the mouse. Magn Reson Imaging 14(3):263-274 (Pubitemid 26181445)
12. De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL (205) A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2-3):335-353
13. Dimbylow P (2007) SAR in the mother and foetus for RF plane wave irradiation. Phys Med Biol 52:3791-3802 (Pubitemid 46908595)
14. Edwards MJ (1974) The effects of hyperthermia on pregnancy and prenatal development. Exp Embryol Teratol 1(0):90-133
15. Glover P, Hykin J, Gowland P et al (1995) An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 68(814):1090-1094
16. Hand JW, Li Y, Hajnal JV (2010) Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during RF exposure. Phys Med Biol 55:913-930
17. Levine D, Zuo C, Faro CB, Chen Q (2001) Potential heating effect in the gravid uterus during MR HASTE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(6):856-861 (Pubitemid 32479942)
18. Li ZL, Shiota K (1999) Stage-specific homeotic vertebral transformations in mouse fetuses induced by maternal hyperthermia during somitogenesis. Dev Dyn 216(4-5):336-348
19. Magin RL, Lee JK, Klintsova A et al (2000) Biological effects of longduration, high-field (4 T) MRI on growth and development in the mouse. J Magn Reson Imaging 12(1):140-149 (Pubitemid 30437272)
20. Myers C, Duncan KR, Gowland PA et al (1998) Failure to detect intrauterine growth restriction following in utero exposure to MRI. Br J Radiol 71(845):549-551 (Pubitemid 28243077)
21. Nagaoka T, Togashi T, Saito K et al (2007) An anatomically realistic whole-body pregnant-woman model and specific absorption rates for pregnant-woman exposure to electromagnetic plane waves from 10 MHz-2 GHz. Phys Med Biol 52(22):6731-6745 (Pubitemid 350058958)
22. Reeves MJ, Brandreth M, Whitby EH et al (2010) Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging. Radiology 257(3):802-809
23. Richards DS, Frentzen B, Gerhardt KJ et al (1992) Sound levels in the human uterus. Obstet Gynecol 80(2):186-190
24. Webster WS, Edwards MJ (1984) Hyperthermia and the induction of neural tube defects in mice. Teratology 29(3):417-425 (Pubitemid 14124166)