Pre-stimulus pattern of activity in the fusiform face area predicts face percepts during binocular rivalry

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 522-529

  Hsieh, P J ^a,b   Colas, J T ^b   Kanwisher, N G ^b  

^a DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; FMRI pattern activity; Fusiform face area; Pre stimulus activity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BINOCULAR VISION; BOLD SIGNAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE DOMINANCE; FACE PROFILE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; RETINA IMAGE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEURONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84857141273     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alais D., Blake R. Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 1999, 39:4341-4353.
2. Alais D., Melcher D. Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research 2007, 47:2690-3279.
3. Andrews T.J., Schluppeck D., Homfray D., Mathews P., Blakemore C. Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts conscious perception of Rubin's vase-face illusion. NeuroImage 2002, 17:890-901.
4. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 1989, 96:145-167.
5. Blake R., Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:13-21.
6. Blake R., Westendorf D.H., Overton R. What is suppressed during binocular rivalry?. Perception 1981, 9:223-231.
7. Churchland M.M., Cunningham J.P., Kaufman M.T., Ryu S.I., Shenoy K.V. Cortical preparatory activity: Representation of movement or first cog in dynamical machine?. Neuron 2010, 68:387-400.
8. Crowe D.A., Averbeck B.B., Chafee M.V. Rapid sequences of population activity patterns dynamically encode task-critical spatial information in parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:11640-11653. (2010).
9. Dayan P. A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Computation 1998, 10:1119-1135.
10. Diaz-Caneja E. Sur l'alternance binoculaire. Annals Oculist 1928, (October):721-731.
11. Dörrenhaus W. Musterspezifischer visueller wettstreit. Naturwissenschaften 1975, 62:578-579.
12. Donner T.H., Sagi D., Bonneh Y.S., Heeger D.J. Opposite neural signatures of motion-induced blindness in human dorsal and ventral visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(41):10298-10310.
13. Dougherty R.F., Koch V.M., Brewer A.A., Fischer B., Modersitzki J., Wandell B.A. Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. Journal of Vision 2003, 3:586-598.
14. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
15. Fox R., Check R. Detection of motion during binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 78:388-395.
16. Fox R., Check R. Independence between binocular rivalry suppression and duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1972, 93:283-289.
17. Freeman A.W. Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 94:4412-4420.
18. Fukuda H. Magnitude of suppression of binocular rivalry within the invisible pattern. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1981, 53:371-375.
19. Harrison S.A., Tong F. Decoding reveals the content of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature 2009, 458:632-635.
20. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M.I., Furey M.L., Ishai A., Schouten J.L., Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 2001, 293:2425-2430.
21. Haynes J.D., Rees G. Predicting the stream of consciousness from activity in human visual cortex. Current Biology 2005, 15:1301-1307.
22. Haynes J.D., Rees G. Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2006, 7:523-534.
23. Haynes J.D. Decoding and predicting intentions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2011, 1224:9-21.
24. Heeger D.J., Ress D. What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:142-151.
25. Heekeren H.R., Marrett S., Ungerleider L.G. The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:467-479.
26. Hesselmann G., Kell C.A., Eger E., Kleinschmidt A. Spontaneous local variations in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions. PNAS 2008, 105:10984-10989.
27. Hsieh P.J., Caplovitz G.P., Tse P.U. Bistable illusory rebound motion: Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging of perceptual states and switches. NeuroImage 2006, 32(2):728-739.
28. Hsieh P.J., Tse P.U. Microsaccade rate varies with subjective visibility during motion-induced blindness. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e5163.
29. Hsieh P.J., Tse P.U. 'Brain-reading' of perceived colors reveals a feature mixing mechanism underlying perceptual filling-in in cortical area V1. Human Brain Mapping 2010, 31:1395-1407.
30. Hsieh P.J., Vul E., Kanwisher N. Recognition alters the spatial pattern of fMRI activation in early retinotopic cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103:1501-1507.
31. Kamitani Y., Tong F. Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:679-685.
32. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.C. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17(11):4302-4311.
33. Laing C.R., Chow C.C. A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 2002, 12:39-53.
34. Lankheet M.J.M. Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. Journal of Vision 2006, 6:304-310.
35. Leber A.B., Turk-Browne N.B., Chun M.M. Neural predictors of moment-to-moment fluctuations in cognitive flexibility. PNAS 2008, 105:13592-13597.
36. Lee S.H., Blake R., Heeger D.J. Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:22-23.
37. Lehky S.R. An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception 1988, 17:215-228.
38. Leopold D.A., Logothetis N.K. Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 1996, 379:549-553.
39. Leopold D.A., Wilke M., Maier A., Logothetis N.K. Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:605-609.
40. Logothetis N.K., Leopold D.A., Sheinberg D.L. What is rivaling during binocular rivalry?. Nature 1996, 380:621-624.
41. Leopold D.A., Murayama Y., Logothetis N.K. Very slow activity fluctuations in monkey visual cortex: Implications for functional brain imaging. Cerebral Cortex 2003, 13:422-433.
42. Logothetis N.K. Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 1998, 353:1801-1818.
43. Lumer E.D., Friston K.J., Rees G. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 1998, 280:1930-1934.
44. Meng M., Remus D.A., Tong F. Filling-in of visual phantoms in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1248-1254.
45. Meyers E.M., Freedman D.J., Kreiman G., Miller E.K., Poggio T. Dynamic population coding of category information in inferior temporal and prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 100:1407-1419.
46. Mitchell J.F., Stoner G.R., Reynolds J.H. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature 2004, 429:410-413.
47. Moutoussis K., Keliris G., Kourtzi Z., Logothetis N. A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain. Vision Research 2005, 45:2231-2243.
48. Mueller T.J. A physiological model of binocular rivalry. Visual Neuroscience 1990, 4:63-73.
49. O'Shea R.P., Crassini B. The sensitivity of binocular rivalry suppression to changes in orientation assessed by reaction-time and forced-choice techniques. Perception 1981, 10:283-293.
50. O'Shea R.P. Chronometric analysis supports fusion rather than suppression theory of binocular vision. Vision Research 1987, 27:781-791.
51. Op de Beeck H.P. Probing the mysterious underpinning of multi-voxel fMRI analyses. NeuroImage 2010, 50(2):567-571.
52. Pearson J., Brascamp J. Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. Trends in Cognitive Science 2008, 12:334-341.
53. Pearson J., Clifford C.W., Tong F. The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Current Biology 2008, 18:982-986.
54. Polonsky A., Blake R., Braun J., Heeger D.J. Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:1153-1159.
55. Schoth F., Waberski T.D., Krings T., Gobbele R., Buchner H. Cerebral processing of spontaneous reversals of the rotating Necker cube. Neuroreport 2007, 18(13):1335-1338.
56. Smith E.L., Levi D.M., Harwerth R.S., White J.M. Color vision is altered during the suppression phase of binocular rivalry. Science 1982, 218:802-804.
57. Soon C.S., Brass M., Heinze H.J., Haynes J.D. Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:543-545.
58. Sterzer P., Rees G. A neural basis for perceptual stabilization in binocular rivalry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:389-399.
59. Sugie N. Neural models of brightness perception and retinal rivalry in binocular vision. Biological Cybernetics 1982, 43:13-21.
60. Tong F. Competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible resolution. Brain and Mind 2001, 2:55-83.
61. Tong F., Engel S.A. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 2001, 411:195-199.
62. Tong F., Meng M., Blake R. Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:502-511.
63. Tong F., Nakayama K., Vaughan J.T., Kanwisher N. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 1998, 21:753-759.
64. Turk-Browne N.B., Yi D.J., Chun M.M. Linking implicit and explicit memory: Common encoding factors and shared representations. Neuron 2006, 49(6):917-927.
65. Wales R., Fox R. Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception and Psychophysics 1970, 8:90-94.
66. William M.A., Baker C.I., Op de Beeck H.P., Shim W.M., Dang S., Triantafyllou C., Kanwisher N. Feedback of visual object information to foveal retinotopic cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:1439-1445.
67. Williams M.A., Morris A.P., McGlone F., Abbott D.F., Mattingley J.B. Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(12):2898-2904.
68. Wilson H.R. Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100:14499-14503.
69. Wolfe J.M. Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception 1983, 12:447-456.
70. Wunderlich K., Schneider K., Kastner S. Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate neucleus. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1595-1602.
71. Yu K., Blake R. Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1158-1173.