Three-dimensional electromagnetic navigation vs. fluoroscopy for endovascular aneurysm repair: A prospective feasibility study in patients

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 70-78

  Manstad Hulaas, Frode ^a,c   Tangen, Geir Arne ^b   Dahl, Torbjørn ^a,c   Hernes, Toril A N ^a,b   Aadahl, Petter ^a,c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b SINTEF TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY   (Norway)

^c TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Angioplasty; Catheter navigation; Electromagnetic tracking; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Image guided surgery; Radiologic technology

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FLUOROSCOPY; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATION SYSTEM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CATHETERS; ELECTROMAGNETIC PHENOMENA; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84857131488     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: 15451550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/11-3557.1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Reilly LM, Chuter TA. Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms: design options, device construct, patient selection and complications. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2009; 50:447-460.
2. Greenberg RK, Lytle B. Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Circulation. 2008; 117:2288-2296.
3. Geijer H, Larzon T, Popek R, et al. Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:906-912. (Pubitemid 41582241)
4. Jones C, Badger SA, Boyd CS, et al. The impact of radiation dose exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair on patient safety. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:298-302.
5. McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, et al. Risk prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:27K-36K.
6. Manstad-Hulaas F, Ommedal S, Tangen GA, et al. Side-branched AAA stent-graft insertion using navigation technology: a phantom study. Eur Surg Res. 2007;39:364-371. (Pubitemid 47614361)
7. Manstad-Hulaas F, Tangen GA, Gruionu LG, et al. Three-dimensional endovascular navigation with electromagnetic tracking: ex vivo and in vivo accuracy. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18:230-240.
8. Abi-Jaoudeh N, Glossop N, Dake M, et al. Electromagnetic navigation for thoracic aortic stent-graft deployment: a pilot study in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:888-895.
9. Yaniv Z, Wilson E, Lindisch D, et al. Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. Med Phys. 2009;36:876-892.
10. Eide KR, Ødegård A, Myhre HO, et al. DynaCT during EVAR - a comparison with multidetector CT. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;37:23-30.
11. Riga CV, Cheshire NJ, Hamady M, et al. Robotic endovascular catheters (REC) improve accuracy, reduce time and minimise radiation exposure in complex vascular procedures. Br J Surg. 2009;96:7.
12. Riga CV, Cheshire NJ, Hamady MS, et al. The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent-grafting. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:810-820.
13. Riga C, Bicknell C, Cheshire N, et al. Initial clinical application of a robotically steerable catheter system in endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:149-153.