High-flex Posterior Cruciate-Retaining vs Posterior Cruciate-Substituting Designs in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 368-374

  Yagishita, Kazuyoshi ^a   Muneta, Takeshi ^a   Ju, Young Jin ^a   Morito, Toshiyuki ^a   Yamazaki, Junya ^a   Sekiya, Ichiro ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Posterior cruciate retaining design; Posterior cruciate substituting design; Simultaneous bilateral surgery; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH FLEX POSTERIOR CRUCIATE RETAINING PROSTHESIS; HIGH FLEX POSTERIOR CRUCIATE SUBSTITUTING PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VARUS KNEE;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84857113090     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kim Y.H., Chio Y.C., Kwon O.R., et al. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91:753.
2. Yagishita K., Muneta T., Ikeda H. Step-by-step measurements of soft tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty for patients with varus knees. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:313.
3. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989, 248:9.
4. Maloney W.J., Schurman D.J. The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992, 278:147.
5. Hirsh H.S., Lotke P.A., Morrison L.D. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Clin Orthop 1994, 309:64.
6. Udomkiat P., Meng B.J., Dorr L.D., et al. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate retaining and substitution knee replacement. Clin Orthop 2000, 378:192.
7. Dorr L.D., Ochsner J.L., Gronley J., et al. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate retained versus sacrificed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988, 236:36.
8. Becker M.W., Insall J.N., Faris P.M. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: one cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting. Clin Orthop 1991, 271:122.
9. Tanzer M., Smith K., Burnett S. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:813.
10. Maruyama S., Yoshiya S., Matsui N., et al. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:349.
11. Yoshiya, Matsui N., Komistek R.D., et al. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:777.
12. Clark C.R., Rorabeck C.H., MacDonald S., et al. Posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a randomized study. Clin Orthop 2001, 392:208.
13. Swanik C.B., Lephart S.M., Rubash H.E. Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:328.
14. Harato K., Bourne R.B., Victor J., et al. Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genisis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee 2008, 15:217.
15. Catani F., Leardini A., Ensini A., et al. The Stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized design. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:775.
16. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Stiehl J.B., et al. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:748.
17. Merrill A., Ritter M.D., Joseph D., et al. The effect of postoperative range of motion on functional activities after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:777.
18. Misra A.N., Hussain M.R., Fiddian N.J., et al. The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:389.
19. Li G., Zayontz S., Most E., et al. Cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro comparison of the kinematics under muscle loads. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16(Suppl 1):150.