Sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE: A case study of fractures with thiazolidinediones

Health Information and Libraries Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 28-38

  Golder, Su ^a   Loke, Yoon K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bibliographic databases; Database searching; Literature searching; Medical subject headings (MeSH); MEDLINE; Methodological filters; Search strategies; Searching

Indexed keywords

2,4 THIAZOLIDINEDIONE DERIVATIVE; ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; FRACTURE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL SUBJECT HEADINGS; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PRODUCTIVITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EFFICIENCY; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL SUBJECT HEADINGS; MEDLINE; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBJECT HEADINGS; THIAZOLIDINEDIONES;

EID: 84857092841     PISSN: 14711834     EISSN: 14711842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00972.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Keech, A. C., Wonders, S. M., Cook, D. I. & Gebski, V. J. Balancing the outcomes: reporting adverse events. Medical Journal of Australia 2004, 181, 215-218.
2. Strom, B. L. What is Pharmacoepidemiology? In: Strom, B. L. (ed). Pharmacoepidemiology. Chichester: John Wiley, 2006. 3-11.
3. Loke, Y. K. Assessing the benefit-harm balance at the bedside. BMJ 2004, 329, 7-8.
4. Pirmohamed, M. & Darbyshire, J. Collecting and sharing information about harms: appropriate strategies to communicate this information are essential. BMJ 2004, 329, 6-7.
5. Ross, S. D. Drug-related adverse events: a readers' guide to assessing literature reviews and meta-analyses. Archives of Internal Medicine 2001, 161, 1041-1046.
6. Derry, S., Loke, Y. K. & Aronson, J. K. Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2001, 1, 7.
7. MacLaughlin, P. Integration of pre-clinical, clinical and post-market safety data to help researchers assess drug candidates and advance drug development. In: Pharma-Bio-Med 2007 Conference and Exposition; 2007 11-14 November; Athens, Greece. 2007.
8. Etminan, M., Carleton, B. & Rochon, P. A. Quantifying adverse drug events : are systematic reviews the answer? Drug Safety 2004, 27, 757-761.
9. Wieland, S. & Dickersin, K. Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005, 58, 560-567.
10. Ioannidis, J. P. & Lau, J. Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. JAMA 2001, 285, 437-443.
11. Loke, Y. K., Edwards, J. & Deny, S. Conventional search strategies cannot easily identify those trials of drug therapy which provide quantitative adverse effects data. 7th Annual Cochrane Colloquium Abstracts, October 1999 in Rome 1999.
12. Loke, Y. K. The applications and limitations of systematic review and meta-analysis in assessing adverse drug reactions. London: King's College, 2003.
13. Windsor, D. A. Adverse-reactions literature: a bibliometric analysis. Methods of Information in Medicine 1977, 16, 52-54. Available at:
14. Nuovo, J. & Sather, C. Reporting adverse events in randomized controlled trials. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 2007, 16, 349-351.
15. Bernal-Delgado, E. & Fisher, E. S. Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008, 8, 14.
16. Jenkins, M. Evaluation of methodological search filters - a review. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2004, 21, 148-163.
17. White, V. J., Glanville, J. M., Lefebvre, C. & Sheldon, T. A. A statistical approach to designing search filters to find systematic reviews: objectivity enhances accuracy. Journal of Information Science 2001, 27, 357-370.
18. Wilczynski, N. L., Morgan, D., Haynes, R. B. & Haynes Team An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2005, 21, 20.
19. Glanville, J. M., Lefebvre, C., Miles, J. N. & Camosso-Stefinovic, J. How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2006, 94, 130-136.
20. Badgett, R., Chiquette, E., Anagnostelis, B. & Mulrow, C. Locating reports of serious adverse drug reactions (PowerPoint presentation). 1999. Available at: (accessed 7 January 2005).
21. Badgett, R., Chiquette, E., Anagnostelis, B. & Mulrow, C. Locating reports of serious adverse drug reactions. 7th Annual Cochrane Colloquium Abstracts, October 1999: Rome, Italy. 1999. Available at: (accessed 2 December 2011).
22. BMJ Clinical Evidence. Search filters. BMJ. 2006. Available at: (accessed 13 May 2005).
23. Buckingham, J., Fisher, B. & Saunders, D. Ovid Medline/Pubmed search strategies for aticles on causation/harm/etiology. Alberta: evidence Based Medicine Tool Kit; 2005. Available at: (accessed 13 May 2005).
24. Golder, S., McIntosh, H. M., Duffy, S. & Glanville, J. Developing efficient search strategies to identify reports of adverse effects in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2006, 23, 3-12.
25. Wieland, S. & Dickersin, K. Erratum: selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (June 2005) 58:6 (560-567)). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005, 58, 1077.
26. Golder, S. & Loke, Y. K. Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2009, 97, 84-92.
27. Loke, Y. K., Singh, S. & Furberg, C. D. Long-term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008, 180, 32-39.
28. Bachmann, L. M., Estermann, P., Kronenberg, C. & ter Riet, G. Identifying diagnostic accuracy studies in EMBASE. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2003, 91, 341-346.
29. Tanon, A., Champagne, F., Contandriopoulos, A.-P., Pomey, M.-P., Vadeboncoeur, A. & Nguyen, H. Patient safety and systematic reviews: finding papers indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Qual Saf Health Care 2010, 19, 452-461.
30. Topfer, L., Parada, A., Menon, D., Noorani, H., Perras, C. & Serra-Prat, M. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1999, 15, 297-303.
31. Woods, D. & Trewheellar, K. Medline and Embase complement each other in literature searches. BMJ 1998, 316, 1166.