Patient safety and systematic reviews: Finding papers indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 452-461

  Tanon, A A ^a   Champagne, F ^a   Contandriopoulos, A P ^a   Pomey, M P ^a   Vadeboncoeur, A ^b   Nguyen, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MONTREAL HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LITERATURE; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; SAFETY;

DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL ERRORS; MEDLINE; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 78249242403     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: 14753901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.031401     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Stelfox HT, Palmisani S, Scurlock C, et al. The "To Err Is Human" report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15: 174-8.
2. Zipperer L. Clinicians, librarians and patient safety: opportunities for partnership. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13: 218-22.
3. McKibbon KA, Walker-Dilks CJ. The quality and impact of MEDLINE searches performed by end users. Health Libr Rev 1995;12: 191-200.
4. Davies K. The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: a review of the evidence. Health Info Libr J 2007;24: 78-94.
5. Green ML, Ruff TR. Why do residents fail to answer their clinical questions? A qualitative study of barriers to practicing evidence-based medicine. Acad Med 2005;80: 176-82.
6. King DN. The contribution of hospital library information services to clinical care: a study in eight hospitals. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1987;75: 291-301.
7. Marshall JG. The impact of the hospital library on clinical decision making: the Rochester study. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1992;80: 169-78.
8. Weightman AL, Williamson J. Library & Knowledge Development Network (LKDN) Quality and Statistics Group. The value and impact of information provided through library services for patient care: a systematic review. Health Info Libr J 2005;22: 4-25.
9. Grant MJ. How does your searching grow? A survey of search preferences and the use of optimal search strategies in the identification of qualitative research. Health Info Libr J 2004;21: 21-32.
10. De Groote SL, Dorsch JL. Measuring use patterns of online journals and databases. J Med Libr Assoc 2003;91 ;231 -40.
11. Haynes RB, Wilczynski N, McKibbon KA, et al. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994;1 : 447-58.
12. White VJ, Glanville JM, Lefebvre C, et al. A statistical approach to designing search filters to find systematic reviews: objectivity enhances accuracy. J Info Sci 2001;27: 357-70.
13. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. The Medline database. BMJ 1997;315: 180-3.
14. Golder S, McIntosh HM, Duffy S, et al. Developing efficient search strategies to identify reports of adverse effects in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Health Info Libr J 2006;23: 3-12.