Accurate, rapid taxonomic classification of fungal large-subunit rRNA Genes

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1523-1533

  Liu, Kuan Liang ^a,b   Porras Alfaro, Andrea ^c,d   Kuske, Cheryl R ^a   Eichorst, Stephanie A ^a   Xie, Gary ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANCHOR POINT; BAYESIAN CLASSIFIER; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CLASSIFIER PERFORMANCE; DATABASE PROJECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYS; FUNGAL ISOLATES; GENE FRAGMENTS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; INTEGRAL PART; INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACERS; LARGE DATASETS; PCR PRIMERS; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; ROBUST CLASSIFICATION; RRNA GENES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE DATABASE; TEST REGIONS; TRAINING SETS;

GENES; RNA;

FUNGI;

FUNGAL RNA; RIBOSOME RNA; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 26S;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FUNGUS; PHYLOGENETICS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TAXONOMY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FUNGUS; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; RNA GENE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME;

CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FUNGI; GENES, RRNA; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84857091706     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06826-11     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arnold AE, et al. 2009. A phylogenetic estimation of trophic transition networks for ascomycetous fungi: are lichens cradles of symbiotrophic fungal diversification? Syst. Biol. 58:283-297.
2. Blackwell M. 2011. The fungi: 1, 2, 3... 5.1 million species? Am. J. Bot. 98:426-438.
3. Blackwell M, Hibbett DS, Taylor JW, Spatafora JW. 2006. Research coordination networks: a phylogeny for kingdom Fungi (deep hypha). Mycologia 98:829-837.
4. Buee M, et al. 2009. 454 pyrosequencing analyses of forest soils reveal an unexpectedly high fungal diversity. New Phytol. 184:449-456.
5. Camacho C, et al. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421.
6. Claesson MJ, et al. 2009. Comparative analysis of pyrosequencing and a phylogenetic microarray for exploring microbial community structures in the human distal intestine. PLoS One 4:e6669.
7. Cole JR, et al. 2009. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D141- D145.
8. Dohm JC, Lottaz C, Borodina T, Himmelbauer H. 2008. Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:e105.
9. Guadet J, Julien J, Lafay JF, Brygoo Y. 1989. Phylogeny of some Fusarium species, as determined by large-subunit rRNA sequence comparison. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:227-242.
10. Hibbett DS, et al. 2011. Progress in molecular and morphological taxon discovery in fungi and options for formal classification of environmental sequences. Fungal Biol. Rev. 25:38-47.
11. Hugenholtz P, Goebel BM, Pace NR. 1998. Impact of cultureindependent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J. Bacteriol. 180:4765-4774.
12. James TY, et al. 2006. A molecular phylogeny of the flagellated fungi (Chytridiomycota) and description of a new phylum (Blastocladiomycota). Mycologia 98:860-871.
13. Jones MD, et al. 2011. Discovery of novel intermediate forms redefines the fungal tree of life. Nature 474:200-203.
14. Jumpponen A, Jones KL. 2009. Massively parallel 454 sequencing indicates hyperdiverse fungal communities in temperate Quercus macrocarpa phyllosphere. New Phytol. 184:438-448.
15. Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P. 2010. Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ. Microbiol. 12:118-123.
16. Ludwig W, et al. 2004. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1363-1371.
17. Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson KH. 2008. Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol. Bioinform. Online 4:193-201.
18. O'Brien HE, Parrent JL, Jackson JA, Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R. 2005. Fungal community analysis by large-scale sequencing of environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:5544-5550.
19. Ö pik M, Moora M, Liira J, Zobel M. 2006. Composition of rootcolonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in different ecosystems around the globe. J. Ecol. 94:778-790.
20. Öpik M, et al. 2010. The online database MaarjAM reveals global and ecosystemic distribution patterns in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). New Phytol. 188:223-241.
21. Porras-Alfaro A, Herrera J, Natvig DO, Lipinski K, Sinsabaugh RL. 2011. Diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities in a semiarid grassland. Mycologia 103:10-21.
22. Pruesse E, et al. 2007. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:7188-7196.
23. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27:623-656.
24. Shenoy BD, Jeewon R, Hyde KD. 2007. Impact of DNA sequence-data on the taxonomy of anamorphic fungi. Fungal Divers. 26:1-54.
25. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5261-5267.
26. Werner JJ, et al. 2011. Impact of training sets on classification of highthroughput bacterial 16S rRNA gene surveys. ISME J. 6:94-103.
27. Woese CR, Fox GE. 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74:5088-5090.