Constraint-based design critic for flat-pack furniture design

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 19-26

  Oh, Yeonjoo ^a   Gross, Mark D ^a   Ishizaki, Suguru ^a   Do, Ellen Yi Luen ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Constraint based tutors; Delivery types; Design critiquing; Modalities

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION; COMMUNICATION MODALITIES; CONSTRAINT-BASED; CONSTRAINT-BASED DESIGN; DELIVERY TYPES; FURNITURE DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE LEVEL; MODALITIES;

DESIGN;

EID: 84857079035     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Goldschmidt, G. (2002). One-on-One: A Pedagogic Base for Design Instruction in the Studio Common Ground Design Research Society International Conference Brunel University 430 - 437
2. Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design Juries on Trial: the Renaissance of the Design Studio. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent Tutoring Goes to the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30 - 43.
4. Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning from Performance Errors. Psychological Review, 3(2), 241 - 262.
5. The Intelligent Computer Tutoring Group (ICTG). (2009). Retrieved Aug, 20, 2009, from http://ictg.canterbury.ac.nz/
6. Suraweera, P., & Mitrovic, A. (2002). Kermit: A Constraint-Based Tutor for Database Modeling. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2363, 377 - 387.
7. Fischer, G., McCall, R., & Morch, A. I. (1989). Design Environments for Constructive and Argumentative Design. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '89), Austin, Texas. 269 - 275.
8. Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Suzuki, T., Takada, S., & Gross, M. D. (1998). From Critiquing to Representational Talkback: computer support for revealing features in design. Knowledge-Based Systems, 11(7-8), 457 - 468.
9. Graesser, A. C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B. C., & Olney, A. (2005). AutoTutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System with Mixed-initiative Dialogue. IEEE Transactions in Education, 48, 612 - 618.
10. Milik, N., Marshall, M., & Mtrovic, A. (2006). Responding to Free-form Student Questions in ERM-Tutor. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4053, 707 - 709.
11. Mitrovic, A. (2002). NORMIT: A Web-Enabled Tutor for Database Normalization. International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE). 1276 - 1280.
12. Mostow, J., Aist, G., Burkhead, P., Corbett, A., Cuneo, A., Eitelman, S., et al. (2003). Evaluation of an Automated Reading Tutor that Listens: Comparison to Human Tutoring and Classroom Instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(1), 61 - 117.
13. Oh, Y., Do, E. Y.-L., & Gross, M. D. (2004). Intelligent Critiquing of Design Sketches. AAAI (American Association for Artificial Intelligence) Fall Symposium - Making Pen-based Interaction Intelligent and Natural, Washington DC. 127 - 133.
14. Uluoglu, B. (2000). Design Knowledge Communicated in Studio Critiques Design Studies, 21(1), 33 - 58
15. Bailey, R. O. N. (2004). The Digital Design Coach: Enhancing Design Conversations in Architecture Education. PhD Dissertation Victoria University of Wellington
16. Schön, D. A. (1985). The Design Studio. London: RIBA.
17. Wampler, J. (2002). Architecture Studio: Building in Landscapes. Retrieved Jan. 2009, from MIT Open Courseware: http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/ Architecture/4-125Architecture-Studio-Building-in-LandscapesFall2002/CourseHome/ index.htm
18. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action Basic Books Inc.
19. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning: Cambridge University Press.