Mate choice for a novel male phenotype in zebrafish, Danio rerio

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 811-820

  Owen, M Aaron ^a,b,c   Rohrer, Karl ^a   Howard, Richard D ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Danio rerio; Genetically modified; Mate preference; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

CYPRINID; DIET; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; PHENOTYPE;

DANIO RERIO;

EID: 84857061868     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.029     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Andersson M. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 1982, 299:818-820.
2. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
3. Bakker T., Mazzi D., Zala S. Parasite-induced changes in behavior and color make Gammarus pulex more prone to fish predation. Ecology 1997, 78:1098-1104.
4. Basolo A. Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science 1990, 250:808-810.
5. Bateson P. Sexual imprinting and optimal outbreeding. Nature 1978, 273:659-660.
6. Breden F., Novinger D., Schubert A. The effect of experience on mate choice in the Trinidad guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Environmental Biology of Fishes 1995, 42:323-328.
7. Burley N., Krantzberg G., Radman P. Influence of colour-banding on the conspecific preferences of zebra finches. Animal Behaviour 1982, 30:444-455.
8. Bush S.L., Gerhardt H.C., Schul J. Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm. Animal Behaviour 2002, 63:7-14.
9. Darrow K., Harris W. Characterization and development of courtship in zebrafish, Danio rerio. Zebrafish 2004, 1:40-45.
10. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection 1859, J. Murray, London.
11. Darwin C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex 1871, J. Murray, London.
12. Dugatkin L. Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. American Naturalist 1992, 139:1384-1389.
13. Eakley A., Houde A. Possible role of female discrimination against 'redundant' males in the evolution of colour pattern polymorphism in guppies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2004, 271:S299-S301.
14. Eaton R., Farley R. Spawning cycle and egg production of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Copeia 1974, 1974:195-204.
15. Ehrman L. Mating success and genotypic frequency in Drosophila. Animal Behaviour 1966, 14:332-339.
16. Endler J., Basolo A. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1998, 13:415-420.
17. Engeszer R.E., Ryan M., Parichy D. Learned social preference in zebrafish. Current Biology 2004, 14:881-884.
18. Engeszer R.E., Patterson L.B., Rao A.A., Parichy D.M. Zebrafish in the wild: a review of natural history and new notes from the field. Zebrafish 2007, 4:21-40.
19. Fang F. Phylogenetic analysis of the Asian cyprinid genus Danio (Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Copeia 2003, 2003:714-728.
20. Fisher R. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 1930, Clarendon, Oxford.
21. Freeberg T. Culture and courtship in vertebrates: a review of social learning and transmission of courtship systems and mating patterns. Behavioural Processes 2000, 51:177-192.
22. Galef B., Lim T., Gilbert G. Evidence of mate choice copying in Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus. Animal Behaviour 2008, 75:1117-1123.
23. Gerlach G., Lysiak N. Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in zebrafish, Danio rerio, is based on phenotype matching. Animal Behaviour 2006, 71:1371-1377.
24. Godin J., Hair K. Mate-choice copying in free-ranging Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behaviour 2009, 146:1443-1461.
25. Hörster A., Curio E., Witte K. No sexual imprinting on a red bill as a novel trait. Behaviour 2000, 137:1223-1239.
26. Howard R.D., Young J. Individual variation in male vocal traits and female mating preferences in Bufo americanus. Animal Behaviour 1998, 55:1165-1179.
27. Howard R.D., Martens R., Innis S., Drnevich J., Hale J. Mate choice and mate competition influence male body size in Japanese medaka. Animal Behaviour 1998, 55:1151-1163.
28. Hughes A., Saszik S., Bilotta J., DeMarco P.J., Patterson W.F. Cone contributions to the photopic spectral sensitivity of the zebrafish ERG. Visual Neuroscience 1998, 15:1029-1037.
29. Hughes K., Du L., Rodd F., Reznick D. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Animal Behaviour 1999, 58:907-916.
30. van den Hurk R., Lambert J.G.D. Ovarian steroid glucuronides function as sex pheromones for male zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Canadian Journal of Zoology 1983, 61:2381-2387.
31. Hutter S., Penn D.J., Magee S., Zala S.M. Reproductive behaviour of wild zebrafish (Danio rerio) in large tanks. Behaviour 2010, 147:641-660.
32. Ibrahim A., Huntingford F. Laboratory and field studies on diet choice in three-spined stickle-backs, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., in relation to profitability and visual features of prey. Journal of Fish Biology 1989, 34:245-257.
33. Immelmann K. Ecological significance of imprinting and early learning. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1975, 6:15-37.
34. Irwin D., Price T. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 1999, 82:347-354.
35. Jang Y., Gerhardt H.C. Divergence in female calling song discrimination between sympatric and allopatric populations of the southern wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2006, 60:150-158.
36. Jennions M., Petrie M. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1997, 72:283-327.
37. Jones I., Hunter F. Heterospecific mating preferences for a feather ornament in least auklets. Behavioral Ecology 1998, 9:187-192.
38. Kendrick K., Hinton M., Atkin K., Haupt M., Skinner J. Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature 1998, 395:229-230.
39. Kirkpatrick M. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 1982, 36:1-12.
40. Kirkpatrick M. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1987, 18:43-70.
41. Kirkpatrick M., Ryan M. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 1991, 350:33-38.
42. Kokko H., Jennions M., Houde A. Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2007, 274:1317-1324.
43. Kozak G., Boughman J. Learned conspecific mate preference in a species pair of sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology 2009, 20:1282-1288.
44. Laale H. The biology and use of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio, in fisheries research. Journal of Fish Biology 1977, 10:121-173.
45. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 1981, 78:3721-3725.
46. Lawrence C. The husbandry of zebrafish (Danio rerio): a review. Aquaculture 2007, 269:1-20.
47. Lehmann G.U.C., Lehmann A.W. Bushcricket song as a clue for spermatophore size?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2008, 62:569-578.
48. Lorenz K. Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. Journal of Ornithology 1935, 83:137-213.
49. McGuigan K., Van Homrigh A., Blows M. An evolutionary limit to male mating success. Evolution 2008, 62:1528-1537.
50. MacLaren R.D., Rowland W.J. Differences in female preference for male body size in Poecilia latipinna using simultaneous versus sequential stimulus presentation designs. Behaviour 2006, 143:273-292.
51. Mays H., Hill G. Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2004, 19:554-559.
52. Moretz J., Martins E., Robison B. The effects of early and adult social environment on zebrafish (Danio rerio) behavior. Environmental Biology of Fishes 2007, 80:91-101.
53. Muir W.M., Howard R.D. Possible ecological risks of transgenic organism release when transgenes affect mating success: sexual selection and the Trojan gene hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 1999, 96:13853-13856.
54. Penn D., Potts W. MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 1998, 265:1299-1306.
55. Pyron M. Female preferences and male-male interactions in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Canadian Journal of Zoology 2003, 81:122-125.
56. Robinson J., Schmidt E.A., Harosi F.I., Reece R.J., Dowling J.E. Zebrafish ultraviolet visual pigment: absorption spectrum, sequence, and localization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 1993, 90:6009-6012.
57. Rodd H., Hughes K., Grether G., Baril C. A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2002, 269:475-481.
58. Rosenqvist G., Houde A. Prior exposure to male phenotypes influences mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behavioral Ecology 1997, 8:194-198.
59. Rutledge J.M., Miller A., Uetz G.W. Exposure to multiple sensory cues as a juvenile affects adult female mate preferences in wolf spiders. Animal Behaviour 2010, 80:419-426.
60. Rutstein A.N., Brazil-Boast J., Griffith S.C. Evaluating mate choice in the zebra finch. Animal Behaviour 2007, 74:1277-1284.
61. Ryan M., Fox J., Wilczynski W., Rand S. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature 1990, 343:66-67.
62. Schlupp I., Waschulewski M., Ryan M. Female preferences for naturally-occurring novel male traits. Behaviour 1999, 136:519-527.
63. Sharma M.D., Tregenza T., Hosken D.J. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2010, 23:1672-1679.
64. Sisodia S., Singh B. Size-dependent sexual selection in Drosophila ananassae. Genetica 2004, 121:207-217.
65. Snekser J., McRobert S., Murphy C., Clotfelter E. Aggregation behavior in wildtype and transgenic zebrafish. Ethology 2006, 112:181-187.
66. Spence R., Smith C. Male territoriality mediates density and sex ratio effects on oviposition in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Animal Behaviour 2005, 69:1317-1323.
67. Spence R., Smith C. Mating preference of female zebrafish, Danio rerio, in relation to male dominance. Behavioral Ecology 2006, 17:779-783.
68. Spence R., Smith C. The role of early learning in determining shoaling preferences based on visual cues in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Ethology 2007, 113:62-67.
69. Spence R., Smith C. Innate and learned colour preference in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Ethology 2008, 114:582-588.
70. Spence R., Jordan W.C., Smith C. Genetic analysis of male reproductive success in relation to density in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Frontiers in Zoology 2006, 3:5.
71. Spence R., Fatema M., Reichard M., Huq K., Wahab M., Ahmed A., Smith C. The distribution and habitat preference of the zebrafish in Bangladesh. Journal of Fish Biology 2006, 69:1435-1448.
72. Spence R., Gerlach G., Lawrence C., Smith C. The behaviour and ecology of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Biological Reviews 2008, 83:13-34.
73. ten Cate C., Vos D. Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: a reassessment. Advances in the Study of Behavior 1999, 28:1-31.
74. Trivers R. Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1972, 136-179. Aldine, Chicago. B. Campbell (Ed.).
75. Uetz G.W., Norton S. Preference for male traits in female wolf spiders varies with the choice of available males, female age and reproductive state. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2007, 61:631-641.
76. Utne-Palm A. The effect of prey mobility, prey contrast, turbidity and spectral composition on the reaction distance of Gobiusculus flavescens to its planktonic prey. Journal of Fish Biology 1999, 54:1244-1258.
77. Verzijden M., ten Cate C. Early learning influences species assortative mating preferences in Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Biology Letters 2007, 3:134-136.
78. Wagner W. Measuring female mating preferences. Animal Behaviour 1998, 55:1029-1042.
79. Walling C., Royle N., Lindstrom J., Metcalfe N. Experience-induced preference for short-worded males in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri. Animal Behaviour 2008, 76:271-276.
80. West-Eberhard M.J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
81. Widemo F., Saether S.A. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1999, 14:26-31.
82. Witte K., Curio E. Sexes of a monomorphic species differ in preferences for mates with a novel trait. Behavioral Ecology 1999, 10:15-21.
83. Witte K., Hirschler U., Curio E. Sexual imprinting on a novel adornment influences mate preferences in the Javanese mannikin Lonchura leucogastroides. Ethology 2000, 106:349-363.