No sexual imprinting on a red bill as a novel trait

Behaviour

Volumn 137, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1223-1239

  Hörster, Anne ^a   Curio, Eberhard ^a   Witte, Klaudia ^a,b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038999842     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853900502619     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. - Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Bakker, T.C.M. & Pomiankowski, A. (1995). The genetic basis of female mate preferences. - J. Evol. Biol. 8, p. 129-171.
3. Bateson, P.P.G. (1978). Sexual imprinting and optimal outbreeding. - Nature 237, p. 659-660.
4. Bischof, H.-J. (1994). Sexual imprinting as a two-stage process. - In: Causal mechanisms of behavioural development (J.A. Hogan & J.J. Bolhuis, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 82-97.
5. _ & Clayton, N. (1991). Stabilization of sexual preferences by sexual experience in male zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata castanotis. - Behaviour 118, p. 144-155.
6. Burley, N. (1981). Sex-ratio manipulation and selection for attractiveness. - Science 211, p. 721-722.
7. _ (1986). Comparison of band-colour preferences of two species of estrildid finches. -Anim. Behav. 34, p. 1732-1741.
8. _ & Coopersmith, C.B. (1987). Bill color preferences of zebra finches. - Ethology 76, p. 133-151.
9. _, Krantzberg, G. & Radman P. (1982). Influence of colour banding on conspecific preferences of zebra finches. - Anim. Behav. 30, p. 444-455.
10. ten Cate, C. & Bateson, P. (1988). Sexual selection: The evolution of conspicuous characteristics in birds by means of imprinting. - Evolution 42, p. 1355-1358.
11. _ & _ (1989). Sexual imprinting and a preference for 'supernormal' partners in Japanese quail. - Anim. Behav. 38, p. 356-358.
12. _, Los, L. & Schilperoord, L. (1984). The influence of differences in social experience on the development of species recognition in zebra finch males. -Anim. Behav. 32, p. 852-860.
13. _ & Vos, D.R. (1999). Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: a reassessment. - Adv. Study Behav. 28, p. 1-31.
14. Collins, S.A., Hubbard, C. & Houtman A.M. (1994). Female mate choice in the zebra finch - The effect of male beak colour and male song. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35, p. 21-25.
15. Domjan, J. (1992). Adult learning and mate choice: Possibilities and experimental evidence. - Amer. Zool. 32, p. 48-61.
16. Fitch, H.S. & Hillis, D.M. (1984). The Anolis dewlap: Interspecific variability and morphological associations with habitat. - Copeia 1984, p. 315-323.
17. Garson, P.J., Dunn, J.L., Walton, C.J. & Shaw, P.A. (1980). Stimuli eliciling a courtship from domesticated zebra finches. - Anim. Behav. 28, p. 1184-1187.
18. Goodwin, D. (1982). Estrildid finches of the world. - British Museum (Natural History): Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Grant, B.R. & Grant, P.R. (1987). Mate choice in Darwin's finches. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 32, p. 247-270.
20. Immelmann, K. (1959). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die biologische Bedeutung artspezifischer Merkmale beim Zebrafinken (Taeniopygia castanotis Gould). - Zool. Jahrb. 86, p. 437-592.
21. _ (1972). Sexual and other long-term aspects of imprinting in birds and other species. -Adv. Study Behav. 4, p. 147-174.
22. _ (1975). The evolutionary significance of early experience. - Clarendon Press, Oxford.
23. Kalmus, H. & Maynard Smith, S.J. (1966). Some evolutionary consequences of pegmatypic mating systems (imprinting). - Am. Nat. 100, p. 619-635.
24. Kendrick, K.M., Hinton, M.R., Atkins, K., Haupt, M.A. & Skinner, J.D. (1998). Mothers determine sexual preferences. - Nature, 395, p. 229-230.
25. Laland, K.N. (1994). On the evolutionary consequences of sexual imprinting. - Evolution 48, p. 477-489.
26. O'Donald, P. (1960). Inbreeding as a result of imprinting. - Heredity 15, p. 79-85.
27. Oetting, S. & Bischof, H.J. (1996). Sexual imprinting in female zebra finches: Changes in preference as an effect of adult experience. - Behaviour 133, p. 387-397.
28. Plenge, M., Curio, E. & Witte, K. (2000). Sexual imprinting supports the evolution of novel male traits by transference of a preference for the colour red. -Behaviour 137, p. 741-758.
29. Ratcliffe, L.M. & Grant, P.R. (1983). Species recognition in Darwin's finches (Geospiza, Gould). I. Discrimination by morphological cues. - Anim. Behav. 31, p. 1139-1153.
30. Ryan, M.J. (1990). Signals, species, and sexual selection. - Am. Sci. 78, p. 46-52.
31. Seiger, M.B. (1967). A computer simulation study of the influence of imprinting on population structure. - Am. Nat. 101, p. 47-57.
32. Sætre, G.-P. & Slagsvold, T. (1992). Evidence for sex recognition from plumage colour by the pied flycatcher. Ficedula hypoleuca. - Anim. Behav. 44, p. 293-299.
33. Slagsvold, T. (1993). Sex recognition and breast stripe size in great tits. - Ardea 81, p. 35-42.
34. Todd, P.M. & Miller, G.F. (1993). Parental guidance suggested: How parental imprinting evolves through sexual selection as an adaptive learning mechanism. - Adapt. Behav. 2, p. 5-47.
35. Vos, D.R. (1994). Sex recognition in zebra finch males results from early experience. -Behaviour 128, p. 1-14.
36. _ (1995). The role of sexual imprinting for sex recognition in zebra finches: a difference between males and females. - Anim. Behav. 50, p. 645-653.
37. _, Prijs, J. & ten Cate, C. (1993). Sexual imprinting in zebra finch males: a differential effect of successive and simultaneous experience with two colour morphs. - Behaviour 126, p. 137-154.
38. Weary, D.M., Guilford, T.C. & Weisman, R.G. (1993). A product of discriminative learning may lead to female preferences for elaborate males. - Evolution 47, p. 333-336.
39. Williams, E.E. & Rand, A.S. (1977). Species recognition, dewlap function and faunal size. - Am. Zool. 17, p. 261-270.
40. Witte, K. (1990). Versuche zur intersexuellen Selektion beim Java-Bronzemännchen (Lonchura leucogastroides), einer monomorphen Prachtfinkenart. - Diploma thesis.
41. _ & Curio, E. (1999). Sexes of a monomorphic species differ in preference for mates with a novel trait. - Behav. Ecol. 10, p. 15-21.
42. _, Hirschler, U. & Curio, E. (2000). Sexual imprinting on a novel trait influences mate preferences in the Javanese mannikin (Lonchura leucogastroides). - Ethology 106. p. 349-363.
43. Wolters H.E. (1979-1982). Die Vogelarten der Erde. - Verlag Paul Parey Hamburg.