Time-course analysis of temporal preparation on central processes

Psychological Research

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 236-251

  Leonhard, Tanja ^a   Bratzke, Daniel ^a   Schröter, Hannes ^a   Ulrich, Rolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857059598     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0364-1     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Anderson, J. A. (1977). Neural models with cognitive implications. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 27-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., Hackley, S. A., & Ulrich, R. (2006). The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 536-542.
3. Bertelson, P., & Tisseyre, F. (1968). The time-course of preparation with regular and irregular foreperiods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 297-300.
4. Bonin-Guillaume, S., Blin, O., & Hasbroucq, T. (2004). An additive factor analysis of the effect of depression on the reaction time of old patients. Acta Psychologica, 117, 1-11.
5. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
6. Bratzke, D., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2009). The source of execution-related dual-task interference: Motor bottleneck or response monitoring? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1413-1426.
7. Broadbent, D., & Gregory, M. (1965). On the interaction of S-R compatibility with other variables affecting reaction time. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 61-67.
8. Burbeck, S. L., & Luce, R. D. (1982). Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 117-133.
9. Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1076, 116-128.
10. Courtière, A., Hardouin, J., Hasbroucq, T., Possamaï, C. A., & Vidal, F. (2000). The additive factor method in rat information processing. Behavioural Processes, 50, 113-121.
11. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42-45.
12. Feller, W. (1971). An introduction to probability theory and its applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13. Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, 64, 27-45.
14. Jaskowski, P., & Verleger, R. (1993). A clock paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 163-174.
15. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253-270.
16. Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2003). Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 40, 806-817.
17. Los, S. A., Knol, D. L., & Boers, R. M. (2001). The foreperiod effect revisited: conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation. Acta Psychologica, 106, 121-145.
18. Los, S. A., & Schut, M. L. J. (2008). The effective time course of preparation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 20-55.
19. Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1089-1097.
20. Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2003). Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 101-151.
21. Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (1999). Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1454-1471.
22. Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597-611.
23. Nickerson, R. S. (1970). The effect of preceding and following auditory stimuli on response times to visual stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 33, 5-20.
24. Nickerson, R. S. (1973). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement? Psychological Review, 80, 489-509.
25. Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133-162.
26. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
27. Raab, D. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574-590.
28. Requin, J., Brener, J., & Ring, C. (1991). Preparation for action. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and autonomic nervous system approaches (pp. 357-448). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
29. Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2010). On the locus of temporal preparation: Enhancement of pre-motor processes? In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 227-241). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Sanders, L. D., & Astheimer, L. B. (2008). Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: Event-related potential evidence. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 732-742.
32. Simon, J. R., & Slaviero, D. P. (1975). Differential effects of a foreperiod countdown pocedure on simple and choice reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7, 9-14.
33. Smulders, F. T. Y. (1993). The selectivity of age effects on information processing: Response times and electrophysiology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
34. Spijkers, W. A. C. (1990). The relation between response-specificity, S-R compatibility, foreperiod duration and muscle-tension in a target aiming task. Acta Psychologica, 261-277.
35. Steinborn, M., Rolke, B., Bratzke, D., & Ulrich, R. (2008). Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: Evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation. Acta Psychologica, 129, 297-307.
36. Sternberg, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147-246.
37. Tandonnet, C., Burle, B., Vidal, F., & Hasbroucq, T. (2003). The influence of time preparation on motor processes assessed by surface Laplacian estimation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2376-2384.
38. The MathWorks (2007). MATLAB - The language of technical computing. MA: Natick.
39. Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242-248.
40. Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 201-237.
41. Ulrich, R. (2009). Uncovering unobservable cognitive mechanisms: The contribution of mathematical models. In F. Rösler, C. Ranganath, B. Röder, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Neuroimaging of human memory: Linking cognitive processes to neural systems (pp. 25-41). New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Ulrich, R., & Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 972-990.
43. Woodrow, H. (1914). The effect upon reaction time of variation in the preparatory interval. In J. Angell, H. Warren, J. Watson, & S. Franz (Eds.), The Psychological Monographs (Vol. 76, pp. 16-65). Princeton, NJ: Psychological Review Company.