Introduction

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 327-334

  Verschaffel, Lieven ^a   Bryant, Peter ^b   Torbeyns, Joke ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c GROUP T Leuven Education College   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857044371     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-012-9381-2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anghileri, J. (1999). Issues in teaching multiplication and division. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools (pp. 184-194). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
2. Anghileri, J. (2001). Development of division strategies for year 5 pupils in ten English schools. British Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 85-103.
3. Ashcraft, M. H. (1982). The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach. Developmental Review, 2, 213-236.
4. Baroody, A. J., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Young children's understanding and application of subtraction-related principles: Introduction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11, 2-9.
5. Beishuizen, M. (1997). Development of mathematical strategies and procedures up to 100. In M. Beishuizen, K. P. E. Gravemeijer, & E. C. D. M. van Lieshout (Eds.), The role of contexts and models in the development of mathematical strategies and procedures (pp. 127-162). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Beta.
6. Blöte, A. W., Klein, A. S., & Beishuizen, M. (2000). Mental computation and conceptual understanding. Learning and Instruction, 10, 221-247.
7. Brissiaud, R. (1994). Teaching and development: Solving "missing addend" problems using subtraction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9, 343-365.
8. Bryant, P., Christie, C., & Rendu, A. (1999). Children's understanding of the relation between addition and subtraction: Inversion, identity and decomposition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 194-212.
9. Campbell, J. I. D. (2008). Subtraction by addition. Memory and Cognition, 36, 1094-1102.
10. Campbell, J. I. D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130, 299-315.
11. Fiori, C., & Zuchheri, L. (2005). An experimental research on error patterns in written subtraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 323-331.
12. Fuson, K. C. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematical teaching and learning (pp. 243-275). New York, NY: Macmillan.
13. Geary, D. C., Frensch, P. A., & Wiley, J. G. (1993). Simple and complex mental subtraction: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 242-256.
14. Gilmore, C. (2006). Investigating children's understanding of inversion using the missing number paradigm. Cognitive Development, 21, 301-316.
15. Gilmore, C., & Bryant, P. (2006). Individual differences in children's understanding of inversion and arithmetical skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 309-331.
16. Gilmore, C., & Bryant, P. (2008). Can children construct inverse relations in arithmetic? Evidence for individual differences in the development of conceptual understanding and computational skill. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 301-316.
17. Gilmore, C. K., & Papadatou-Pastou, M. (2009). Patterns of individual differences in conceptual understanding and arithmetical skill: A meta-analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11, 25-40.
18. Groen, G. J., & Poll, M. (1973). Subtraction and the solution of open sentence problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 16, 292-302.
19. Knight, F. B., Ruch, G. M., & Lutes, O. S. (1925). How shall subtraction be taught? The Journal of Educational Research, 11, 157-168.
20. LeFevre, J.-A., DeStefano, D., Penner-Wilger, M., & Daley, K. E. (2006). Selection of procedures in mental subtraction. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 209-220.
21. Mauro, D. G., LeFevre, J.-A., & Morris, J. (2003). Effects of problem format on division and multiplication performance: Evidence for mediation of division by multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 163-170.
22. Mead, C. D., & Sears, I. (1916). Additive subtraction and multiplicative division tested. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7, 261-270.
23. Peters, G., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Using addition to solve subtractions in the number domain up to 20. Acta Psychologica, 133, 163-169.
24. Piaget, J. (1965). The child's concept of number. New York, NY: Norton.
25. Piaget, J., & Moreau, A. (1977). L'inversion des operations arithmetiques. [The inversion of arithmetic operations.]. In J. Piaget (Ed.), Recherches sur l'abstraction reflechissante: L'abstraction des relations logico-mathematiques [Studies in reflective abstraction: The abstraction of logico-mathematical relations.] Vol. 1 (pp. 45-62). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
26. Piaget, J., & Moreau, A. (2001). The inversion of arithmetic operations (R. L. Campbell, Trans.). In J. Piaget (Ed.), Studies in reflective abstraction (pp. 69-86). Hove: Psychology Press.
27. Rasmussen, C., Ho, E., & Bisanz, J. (2003). Use of the mathematical principle of inversion in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 89-102.
28. Robinson, K. M. (2001). The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 211-222.
29. Robinson, K. M., & Ninowski, J. E. (2003). Adults' understanding of inversion concepts: How does performance on addition and subtraction inversion problems compare to multiplication and division problems? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 321-330.
30. Robinson, K. M., Ninowski, L. E., & Gray, M. L. (2006). Children's understanding of the arithmetic concepts of inversion and associativity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 349-362.
31. Selter, C. (2001). Addition and subtraction of three-digit numbers: German elementary children's success, methods, and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 145-173.
32. Seyler, D. J., Kirk, E. P., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2003). Elementary subtraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1339-1352.
33. Siegler, R. S., & Stern, E. (1998). Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 127, 377-397.
34. Stern, E. (1992). Spontaneous uses of conceptual mathematical knowledge in elementary school children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 266-277.
35. Torbeyns, J., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Efficiency and flexibility of indirect addition in the domain of multi-digit subtraction. Learning and Instruction, 19, 1-12.
36. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Treffers, A. (2009). Mathe-didactical reflections on young children's understanding and application of subtraction-related principles. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11, 102-112.
37. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2007). Whole number concepts and operations. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557-628). New York, NY: Macmillan.
38. Verschaffel, L. & Torbeyns, J. (Eds.) (2009). Young children's understanding and application of subtraction-related principles (Special Issue). Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1-2), 1-112.
39. Wittmann, E. Ch. (2010). Begründung des Ergänzungsverfahrens der schriftlichen Subtraktion aus der Funktionsweise von Zählern. [Grounding the complement method for written subtraction in the way of functioning of numbers.] In C. Böttinger, K. Bräuning, M. Nührenbörger, R. Schwarzkopf & E. Söbbeke (Eds.), Mathematik im Denken der Kinder. Anregungen zur mathematikdidaktischen Reflexion [Mathematics in children's thinking. Suggestions for mathematics educational reflection] (pp. 34-41). Seelze: Klett-Kallmeyer.
40. Woods, S. S., Resnick, L. B., & Groen, G. J. (1975). An experimental test of five process models for subtraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 17-21.